What's new

India spanks USA over diplomat arrest issue !

india can do all chest thumping and make up more false paper, NO, she did not have "full diplomatic immunity". And crime she committed goes beyond her status.

IF US paid ticket that was to help a poor family who were cheated by indian "diplomat". And also maid is being key witness and victim, her family was in risk in india. Everyone know how india treats lower caste or even people from different religions - with massacre and killing.US did the just and moral thing by rescuing maid family.

Why stop at Rescuing just maids family, there are millions who can be rescued,after all its just and moral thing.will do good for the image of US.
 
.
Why stop at Rescuing just maids family, there are millions who can be rescued,after all its just and moral thing.will do good for the image of US.


US law provide protection for the witness and her family and ensure their safe from retaliation when they come forward to report a crime. US not rescue a nanny family but US provide nanny family safe heaven from the prosecution by the Indian government. US immigration department can and will provide asylum to anyone who seek for the reason of political or religious prosecution by their own country at birth.
 
.
Indian citizen should only follow Indian law, not US law. US law has no jurisdiction in India. However, when an Indian enter the US, they have to follow the US law. Its respectful and right for Indians, including diplomats, to follow the US law once they are in the US. Otherwise, look at what happen to your diplomat.



Once she is acquitted by the US court or serve her terms if she is guilty, she can return home to India.

And...who asked you anyway?
 
.
US law provide protection for the witness and her family and ensure their safe from retaliation when they come forward to report a crime. US not rescue a nanny family but US provide nanny family safe heaven from the prosecution by the Indian government. US immigration department can and will provide asylum to anyone who seek for the reason of political or religious prosecution by their own country at birth.

Really does US care about laws so much ?
 
. .
US law provide protection for the witness and her family and ensure their safe from retaliation when they come forward to report a crime. US not rescue a nanny family but US provide nanny family safe heaven from the prosecution by the Indian government. US immigration department can and will provide asylum to anyone who seek for the reason of political or religious prosecution by their own country at birth.

Persecution by Indian government? What are you on these days?
 
.
Persecution by Indian government? What are you on these days?


Maid family fearful of Indian government retaliation or wrongfully prosecute them, they ask and apply political asylum from the US government and were granted for the family to immigrate to the US.
 
.
Maid family fearful of Indian government retaliation or wrongfully prosecute them, they ask and apply political asylum from the US government and were granted for the family to immigrate to the US.

Well that would be fine for an individual like you or me to say but for US government to even think and take action in this regard reeks its contempt towards Indian justice system and GOI. Not to mention it is highly undiplomatic and can also be reciprocated.
 
.
.
.
Well that would be fine for an individual like you or me to say but for US government to even think and take action in this regard reeks its contempt towards Indian justice system and GOI. Not to mention it is highly undiplomatic and can also be reciprocated.




I'm not a politician or a foreign diplomat, can't say how the US government conduct their foreign affair. I'm just simply answer a question posted to me which regard to why US allowed a maid family to move to the US.
 
.
Maid family fearful of Indian government retaliation or wrongfully prosecute them, they ask and apply political asylum from the US government and were granted for the family to immigrate to the US.


India is not a place for under privileged.
 
. .
I'm not a politician or a foreign diplomat, can't say how the US government conduct their foreign affair. I'm just simply answer a question posted to me which regard to why US allowed a maid family to move to the US.

Like wise we are not accusing you personally but the US government for their major goof up of accusing India of having sub standard judicial system. You were validating it with your response.
 
.
Like wise we are not accusing you personally but the US government for their major goof up of accusing India of having sub standard judicial system. You were validating it with your response.



My post no base on personal opinion but base on US law and US immigration law. My respond to the question not in any way imply US was making a major blunder in conducting foreign affair, or stated India judiciary only apply to the jungle law. My validation with my answer are within the context of US law.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom