What's new

India snubs China, to attend Nobel ceremony

Hosting an Tibetan exiled government on your soil is not only a naked and blatant way of disrespecting our sensitivities, but also a outrageous way of interfering with Chinese internal affair which warrants every foreign policies against India.

I can understand you concerns that you feel as a Chinese about this.

But to be more specific the importance the body ,Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) ,holds to the Indian Govt is ,administration of Tibetans in India.

However, their views of Tibet being free are not supported by Indian Gov.

If you ask me why they allowed to express their views of Tibetan freedom in the first place.

The answer is democracy.
Everyone can express their views here.

Even those who openly call for disintegration/breakup of India are allowed to give speeches under Govt security in the country's capital.

There may be political parties which advocate for Tibetan freedom,but then again its that particular party's view and should not be considered convergent with Indian Govt's official stance.

The best thing to do about this ambiguity is some Indian diplomat/Ambassador/foreign minster must clearly state that the Indian Govt does not adhere ,nor support the political views or statements of Central Tibetan Administration.
 
.
Once again I did not support any terrorists (anyone is free to check my post history for themselves) but thank you for your insight. :cheers:

blocking ban on terrorist organistation is the same as supporting them......that's my insight...you might have your own..
 
.
There is none whatsoever... the irony is that India has played host to the DL and will continue to host him till he is peacefully living within India... We will not support any home grown movement against another country. India is a spiritual place and hosting the DL as a spiritual leader will be tolerated, but not as a political leader.

Oh, can you explain that what happened in 2008?

In this way, China will support a religious and national movement leaders, I think it is not too difficult to find a candidate, particularly in India.
 
.
blocking ban on terrorist organistation is the same as supporting them......that's my insight...you might have your own..

My insight, is that your logic is ridiculous.

But feel free to blame other nations for your own internal terrorist problems, I'm sure that will help you out a lot.
 
.
The best thing to do about this ambiguity is some Indian diplomat/Ambassador/foreign minster must clearly state that the Indian Govt does not adhere ,nor support the political views or statements of Central Tibetan Administration.

Even if that happens, the real damage was historical, and continued for half a century. The fact that the Tibetan government in exile continues to spew out slogans against China is more of a "reminder" than anything else, even if it somehow stops.
 
.
blocking ban on terrorist organistation is the same as supporting them......that's my insight...you might have your own..

When did CD blocked the banning of any terrorist organization? It is a news to me
 
.
blocking ban on terrorist organistation is the same as supporting them......that's my insight...you might have your own..

you do realize GOI supported mukti bahini and LTTE as well.
China is simply addressing an ally's (pakistan) concerns. China very well knows the organization but cut them some slack since they sadly don't have a lot of friends. sometimes you do questionable things for friends. I don't see what the big fuss is about.
 
.
I can understand you concerns that you feel as a Chinese about this.

But to be more specific the importance the body ,Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) ,holds to the Indian Govt is ,administration of Tibetans in India.

However, their views of Tibet being free are not supported by Indian Gov.

If you ask me why they allowed to express their views of Tibetan freedom in the first place.

The answer is democracy.
Everyone can express their views here.

Even those who openly call for disintegration/breakup of India are allowed to give speeches under Govt security in the country's capital.

There may be political parties which advocate for Tibetan freedom,but then again its that particular party's view and should not be considered convergent with Indian Govt's official stance.

The best thing to do about this ambiguity is some Indian diplomat/Ambassador/foreign minster must clearly state that the Indian Govt does not adhere ,nor support the political views or statements of Central Tibetan Administration.

The answer is democracy. so that even tibatians can live peacefully in china....and even taiwan will be ready to join..
 
.
as very few India members here said, if you have a really difficult, takes time, then China can understand, but it was only a small number of members of India's views, not to mention the Government of India.
 
.
images


Apparently what used to be a Mexican standoff has degenerated into a free for all. I for one am clueless as to why people are so easily incited by an online news article....

sure the "headline" is catchy...but then again, it was meant to be. I posted regarding this Nobel issue on a diff thread a few days back and it seemed very civil....I guess one cannot under-estimate the persuasive power of newspaper editorials.....both for and against something.

Take a chill pill guys, and ask yourself if its worth getting worked up over a piece of journalism which is nothing but the opinion of the author. The only "fact" in the news paper article is that India is going to the Nobel peace event (which is, the "default" state of affairs). India has not even made a statement regarding this. So I wonder how this could be considered a snub. Journalists are free to express their own opinions; but it is up to the discerning user to sift the facts from all the fluff surrounding it. Keep in mind that half-truths are at times more damaging than outright lies.
 
.
as very few India members here said, if you have a really difficult, takes time, then China can understand, but it was only a small number of members of India's views, not to mention the Government of India.

huzi no worries mate. the sane ones are here now...we'll take care of the kids :D
 
.
Although it hardly matters, at the end of the day I'm not interested in your opinion and you're not interested in mine.

True.

Jade CD doesn't really need that clarification. we'll be better off making it clear to some of our sentimental indian members here who have unnecessarily alienated one of the most pro-india members on pdf.

I disagree. I think you are the one being sentimental here. There are no chinese members who are pro-India, only pro-China (as it should be). Don't know why he is feeling alienated & as you have probably gathered, don't particularly care. If people choose to bring sarcasm into play & unload it on someone, there can be no conceivable response but to engage accordingly. I have had zero interactions with this guy thus far yet he chose to unload on me including some repressed feeling about some other thread I started. His choice, I guess. No issue with that but I do have about the whining that is going on about someone being alienated. If someone is so easily alienated, then they were very probably never with you at all.
 
. .
Democracy? It was a joke, if it really is, do you think that where the rebel movement come from in India ?
 
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom