What's new

India pushes for expansion of permanent seats in UNSC

tinguzzz

BANNED

New Recruit

Joined
May 19, 2010
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
UNITED NATIONS: India, which is seeking a permanent berth in the UN Security Council, has said that expansion of only non-permanent seats does not constitute reform of the world body and demanded that membership be increased in both categories.

In a closed-door meeting at the UN headquarters convened to discuss the negotiating text for the Security Council reform, India also pointed out that a vast majority of countries were in favour of expanding the current size of the world body's top organ from 15 to the mid-20s.

"There cannot be any reform without expansion in both the categories of membership," Hardeep Singh Puri, India's envoy to the UN, said last night.

"Equally, expansion only in the non-permanent category or any of its other variants does not constitute reform and is merely the perpetuation of the current inefficiency by the same ineffective means in vogue since 1963," he said.

India along with Japan, Germany, South Africa and Brazil is seeking permanent membership of the Security Council.

Puri's remarks came a day after a top US official said India would play a "central part" in the Security Council reform process but stopped short of publicly endorsing the country's bid for a permanent seat.

"We're open to expansion of permanent membership of the Council and we believe that India's going to have a central part to play in the consideration that's going to come of that reform of the UN Security Council," Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs William Burns said.

During the inaugural discussions on the UN reform, Zahir Tanin, Afghanistan's permanent representative to the UN, in his capacity as the Chairperson of the process asked member states to submit proposals that can be worked into a negotiating text, which will be the basis for future discussions.

In 2009, member states of the UN had finally abandoned the 'Open Ended Working Group' (OEWG) on the issue that had dragged on for 15 years without yielding any substantive results. In March last year, the old talks were replaced by the new "inter-governmental negotiations."

At the meeting in the UN headquarters, India also underlined the need for equitable geographical distribution.

"India supports a Charter-based distribution of seats that addresses the lack of representation of African, Latin American and Caribbean countries and the lack of adequate representation of Asian countries in the permanent membership," Puri said.

This year, India is also running for a non-permanent seat of the Council for which elections will be held in October. Puri and his team have been canvassing for the spot for the past three years.

Earlier this year, Kazakhstan's withdrew from the electoral race leaving India with a clean slate for 2010-11.

To win, India needs two-thirds of the General Assembly vote, which adds up to about 128 counties saying 'yes' to New Delhi's presence in the Security Council.
 
.
128 countries.... thats a lot, will definitely need the p5 to agree or anyone of them will have enough influence to block this
 
. .
Indias Nuclear Deal was passed even with China not cooperating.

If US gets in, its almost done for india. US is the key.
 
.
with out of 5 any single permanent member IF Veto its all over. us my my a**
 
.
with out of 5 any single permanent member IF Veto its all over. us my my a**

If you are pinning your hopes on China, then here's the news, China already informally gave consent to support India for non-permanent seat.
 
.
India has some chance if he give up the veto power,the same for Japan Germany Brazil and South Africa~~
 
.
Even if India succeed, it would be without Veto power, the 5Ps would not want to dilute their prestigious power.
 
.
Its all a matter of time.

In 98 who would have ever imagined that US ,first to impose sanction will itself initiate the doors in 2008 that open to the exclusive Nuclear Wolrd ?

The same US armtwists China and makes the resolution pass unanimously....

Things are changing and India will be alone as Japan with Brazil and SA make it a strong league.
 
.
^^unless india fully joins the usa camp the us will never "armtist" china for india's sake in this as it would also dilute usa's veto. though like other have said permanent non-veto seat is a much higher possibility in the near future as it does not directly challenge any of the p5's power
 
.
I think India will get permenent seat as it has almost 1/6th of world`s population,growing economy.
If india does not get permanent seat in near future balace of power in the world will be disturbed......and there will be no real meaning of UNSC...
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom