India plotted Mumbai attacks: Leaks quote Zardari

[SpArK]

Courts cannot convict some one no matter how much international or national pressure is on them, the stage was set all that required was Solid Proofs, sadly none were given except some dossiers.

Hey more drama ..

India has agreed to allow a judicial commission from Pakistan to record the statements of key figures, including Ajmal Kasab, in connection with an investigation into the Mumbai terror attacks of November 2008.

And see the list of innocents arrested over it..

The arrested suspects – Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, Hammad Ameen Sadiq, Abdul Wajid, Mazhar Iqbal, Shahid Jamil Riaz, Younus Anjum and Jamil Ahmed – were present in the courtroom during the hearing held in the special court established inside the Adiyala Jail Rawalpindi.

Pretty sad to see really a few men arrested by the court over there for a drama by India.

Mumbai attacks: India allows Pakistan to quiz Ajmal Kasab – The Express Tribune

 

[LaBong]

I am not suggesting that GOI orchestrated 26/11.

I was only responding to the Kashmir angle. GOP or Kashmiri sympathizers would never do 26/11. It is counter-productive.

Most likely it was carried out by people to trigger a Pak-India war. There are enough crazy people on both sides who want that.

You have to consider the fact that during Mush regime India and Pakistan reportedly almost solved Kashmir issue. And the peace drive was sailing smoothly in Jardari's time as well. Off course a permanent solution of Kashmir is not of everyone's benefit, specially not for organizations like LET, for which, the uninterrupted supply of funds and soldiers depends on a prolonged Kashmir conflict.

 

[JonAsad]

If it's a failure of intelligence agencies to pre-empt the strike, how can it be an inside job?

Inside jobs involves intelligence agencies.

 

[LaBong]

Inside jobs involves intelligence agencies.

Genius, if intelligence agencies are involved then the successful strike would be considered as a successful mission to them, isn't it?

 

[Donatello]

What kind of a person are you..... 166 killed more than 200 injured... Cant you see that?

Pakistanis still living in a state of denial when their own government has acknowledged the role of non state actors in 26/11

Stop posting Idiotic comments.


Pakistan is a nation of 175 million people, plus minus a few million.
How can the government know what each and everyone of them is doing?

India accuses Pakistan as a nation of orchestrating such attacks, which is a fallacy.

Pakistan is fighting these so called non-state actors and more Pakisanis have died than Indians, so i doubt if India can teach us what the menace of terrorism is really like.

If India knows where these non-state actors are from, tell Pakistan, for we have more than Indian capability to take them out.

Swat valley is one example so is South and North Waziristan.

Instead GoI was threatening war....what kind of stupid foreign policy is that?


But then again, feel free to blame GoP and Pakistanis, if it helps in any court of law....

 

[ice_man]

& yet no one knows what MOTIVE would this mumbai attack get??


now let me tell you the indian benefits from such attacks:

1) Destroy Pakistan Image in the World & also highlight kashmir movement as a pakistani backed rebel movement & NOT A FREEDOM STRUGGLE!

2)Justify its arm purchase in the future & also open the doors for the rapid finalization of THE NUCLEAR COOPERATION
:

On August 1, 2008, the IAEA approved the safeguards agreement with India,[8] after which the United States approached the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) to grant a waiver to India to commence civilian nuclear trade


3) Finally to win sympathy & show itself equal to London & Newyork in terms of terror threat from "evil pakistan".


so please spare me the crocodile tears about LeT and about poor innocent indians dying this is what you indians call "RAJNETI"

 

[Developereo]

Off course a permanent solution of Kashmir is not of everyone's benefit, specially not for organizations like LET, for which, the uninterrupted supply of funds and soldiers depends on a prolonged Kashmir conflict.

How would a Pak-India war help the Kashmir cause? And I doubt Musharraf could have sold his Kashmir solution to the Pakistani public. Compromise on Kashmir is as much of a political suicide in Pakistan as it is in India.

 

[LaBong]

& yet no one knows what MOTIVE would this mumbai attack get??


now let me tell you the indian benefits from such attacks:

1) Destroy Pakistan Image in the World & also highlight kashmir movement as a pakistani backed rebel movement & NOT A FREEDOM STRUGGLE!

2)Justify its arm purchase in the future & also open the doors for the rapid finalization of THE NUCLEAR COOPERATION
:

On August 1, 2008, the IAEA approved the safeguards agreement with India,[8] after which the United States approached the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) to grant a waiver to India to commence civilian nuclear trade


3) Finally to win sympathy & show itself equal to London & Newyork in terms of terror threat from "evil pakistan".


so please spare me the crocodile tears about LeT and about poor innocent indians dying this is what you indians call "RAJNETI"

For motive refer to my posts #32.

Rest of the points are hogwash. Same can be attributed to Pakistan also can be said that suicide bombs and wot are inside job.

1. To restore Pakistan image and prove to rest of the world that they are also a victim of terror.

2. To get more arms and F16s from US which will be used against India.

3. Finally to prove Pakistanis are no different to rest of the world being victim of terror.

^It even sounds more realistic.

 

[SEAL]

If it's a failure of intelligence agencies to pre-empt the strike, how can it be an inside job?

Indian IB knew about the attacks but they didn't inform other agencies and police.

 

[Donatello]

For motive refer to my posts #32.

Rest of the points are hogwash. Same can be attributed to Pakistan also can be said that suicide bombs and wot are inside job.

1. To restore Pakistan image and prove to rest of the world that they are also a victim of terror.

2. To get more arms and F16s from US which will be used against India.

3. Finally to prove Pakistanis are no different to rest of the world being victim of terror.

^It even sounds more realistic.

What's wrong with World sympathizing with Pakistan as victim of terrorism?

More than 10000 killed, innocent civilians.

....and about f-16s, hahahahahaaa, you guys are shitting in your pants over a squadron or two of F-16s?????

JF-17s and J-10s will be more than enough for India.

 

[LaBong]

How would a Pak-India war help the Kashmir cause? And I doubt Musharraf could have sold his Kashmir solution to the Pakistani public. Compromise on Kashmir is as much of a political suicide in Pakistan as it is in India.

If you think that organization like LET really care for Kashmir cause. Kashmir cause has become a way to achieve power and stay unharmed while indulging in terrorist activity in Pakistan. If Kashmir is solved whom they are gonna fight, on which Jihad the madrasas gonna preach to gullible minds.

 

[India Rising]

Indian IB knew about the attacks but they didn't inform other agencies and police.

and how did you know that ?? is this some kind of joke ??

 

[Donatello]

And yea,

 

[ice_man]

For motive refer to my posts #32.

Rest of the points are hogwash. Same can be attributed to Pakistan also can be said that suicide bombs and wot are inside job.

1. To restore Pakistan image and prove to rest of the world that they are also a victim of terror.

2. To get more arms and F16s from US which will be used against India.

3. Finally to prove Pakistanis are no different to rest of the world being victim of terror.

^It even sounds more realistic.

point 1) Pakistan is seen as the breeding ground of terrorism POST mumbai not before so your point one goes out of the window

2) More F-16s??? we had these F-16 deals from 2005!! and some were our embargoed F-16s the one we paid for in 1991!! besides india lobbied for nations to stop arms sales to pakistan!! e.g Brazil,Sweden even USA!

3) we proved we are victims?? or you cried your crocodile tears to finally put india on the map of "terrorised nations"?


and your post 32 well LeT is NOT capable of such attacks if it were it would have done so ages ago!!! maybe in the 90s when india was much much weaker!

 

[LaBong]

What's wrong with World sympathizing with Pakistan as victim of terrorism?

More than 10000 killed, innocent civilians.

It burns right? So stop blaming India for killing her own people without any prove.

....and about f-16s, hahahahahaaa, you guys are shitting in your pants over a squadron or two of F-16s?????

JF-17s and J-10s will be more than enough for India.

Please say something coherent to get a reply.