What's new

India plotted Mumbai attacks: Leaks quote Zardari

Genius, if intelligence agencies are involved then the successful strike would be considered as a successful mission to them, isn't it?

Inside job have different scale of measuring success, In this case sympathy earned, Pakistan being put under pressure, ISI blamed, so yeah it will be considered as a successful mission.
 
point 1) Pakistan is seen as the breeding ground of terrorism POST mumbai not before so your point one goes out of the window

2) More F-16s??? we had these F-16 deals from 2005!! and some were our embargoed F-16s the one we paid for in 1991!! besides india lobbied for nations to stop arms sales to pakistan!! e.g Brazil,Sweden even USA!

3) we proved we are victims?? or you cried your crocodile tears to finally put india on the map of "terrorised nations"?


and your post 32 well LeT is NOT capable of such attacks if it were it would have done so ages ago!!! maybe in the 90s when india was much much weaker!

Look all above points can be very easily debunked, one hint - you gotto see all the events with a reference of 26/11 not Mumbai.

Anyway, point scoring over innocent people who are getting killed all over the world is not of my taste and this thread seems to be expired of it's useful purpose. :wave:
 
the only point is , Pakistan wanted India to strike in Pakistani Occupied Kashmir so that, they can raise the Kashmir issue and there would be another limited area confrontation like Kargil war. Cease fire is always the result and 1947 Accord brings back both of us behind the Line of Control. NO use of any strikes unless until they come in our region and establish camps. You bomb them in their region they will re-establish the camps in Pakistani Occupied Kashmir.

Every thing revolves around Kashmir for now. But we opted for more clever options. We Indians should simply understand, do not strike. We have economic superiority over them and many developments are going on. They just want us to divert our attention.
 
Last edited:
Your intelligence agency has nut jobs like Hamid Gul openly supporting terrorists and fantasizing demolishing India. There is every possibility that they supported and financed the attack.

Hamid Gul has no power left in ISI. The only thing he has left is his stories of the Soviet war. And no, Pasha is not going to waste his time on him.

Shiv Sena etc etc
 
well mumbai attacks were definetly on the same scale as 9/11 so if you believe 9/11 was an inside job you should believe that indian attack was also an inside job!

Mumbai attacks came at a time when pakistan was itself destabalized! a former PM had died a year back! the sitting government was unstable! pakistan was already being blamed of supporting terrorism!


PAKISTAN HAD NOTHING TO GAIN FROM MUMBAI ATTACKS BUT DEFINETLY HAD ALOT TO LOSE! THE ONLY ADVANTAGE COULD HAVE BEEN FOR INDIA!!!!

you are right :agree::agree::agree:
 
The more Pakistan lives in a state of self-denial regarding itself being the epicentre of terrorism, the more it is damaging its already-maligned reputation.

Regarding Kasab , see this news report by Geo News :

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hamid Gul has no power left in ISI. The only thing he has left is his stories of the Soviet war. And no, Pasha is not going to waste his time on him.

Shiv Sena etc etc

hamid gul may not have power in the ISI,but he has skills and contacts with terrorists as he is sympathetic to their cause,at times i think whom does he hate more US,india or israel.

and i say zardari plotted the killing of his wife,now prove me wrong he gained a lot from it didnt he.
 


---------- Post added at 10:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:30 PM ----------

 
Last edited by a moderator:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom