1 pakistani is sufficient to deal with 4 bharthis. obviously you people need to run in packs where as our intelligence, beauty and strength will overcome all your insecurities.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1 pakistani is sufficient to deal with 4 bharthis. obviously you people need to run in packs where as our intelligence, beauty and strength will overcome all your insecurities.
1 pakistani is sufficient to deal with 4 bharthis. obviously you people need to run in packs where as our intelligence, beauty and strength will overcome all your insecurities.
In 1971 India supported insurgents first.
Not really. Kashmiri maharaja took so long to take a decision in order to stay a 'sovereign' state once brits left. But pakistani forces started moving forward from poonch valley, so maharaja had to accede kashmir to India in order to stop pakistani forces proceeding further.
Indo-Pakistani War of 1947 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
1 pakistani is sufficient to deal with 4 bharthis. obviously you people need to run in packs where as our intelligence, beauty and strength will overcome all your insecurities.
1 pakistani is sufficient to deal with 4 bharthis. obviously you people need to run in packs where as our intelligence, beauty and strength will overcome all your insecurities.
And look who is talking about BEAUTY [india won 5 miss world pakistan 0].
INTELLIGENCE [Indian average IQ is higher than average Pakistani IQ, source:BBC poll]
and STRENGTH [forgot about 47,65,71 and 99?]
Correction 1 Pakistani == 10 Indians. Now it sounds about right.
I agree.
Yes, but that was done by the Pakistan military (the operation). Two different things here.
Duh,we run in packs,thats why Delhi and Mumbai r lot safe.
U deluded in 1 Pakistani 10 Indian stories at a time when ur own brother's burning down ur cities.
no i did not forget.
47 - pakistan beat up india and took half of kashmir away from it
65- india ran like cowards to u.n for a cease fire.
71 - india could not face pakistan in a head on war so had to like cowards create a two front war.
99 - india had to send whole air force, 3/4 of army to take on 5000 pakistanis. and could not even regain control of all territory. and you people are proud of this? now i am ashamed for you people.
You live in your own little world.
47-Pak occupied kashmir even before kashmir signed to india by maharaj.
65-We went to U.N. for a cease fire? loool Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia And please do read 'NEUTRAL ASSESSMENTS'
71-Well, whatever you say, whole world knows what the result is.
99-'Indian military victory, India regains control over Pakistani occupied ridges. Pakistan withdrew from Kashmir to pre-war Line of Control.' Kargil War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And ask ANY mature pakistani they will tell you, what actually happened in these wars? If you'd read the links I gave you, you'd also come across that in 65 and 99 pakistani media fabricated the truth.
^^^^poor poor baby, are your feelings hurt because we pakistanis did not want to live with you indians. and then you post wikipedia links where some nerdy indian is sitting and editing the wikipedia entires to make sure the lie becomes the truth. I know it will be hard but try to find an indian with an IQ of above 80 to tell you what really happened. and we are talking about media fabricating the truth, you better pull your tail sideways and look inwards.
Hurt?! loooool Actually we're happy with 160 indian muslims, who were to loyal to their homeland and wanted to live in india only no matter what. Anything you post on wikipedia is checked twice a day you douche bag! So don't gemme that cr*p. And I'm still to meet a pakistani who doesn't see everthing on basis of religion [this is what happens when you live in theocracy and not in secular democracy] and has IQ even half of average indians. Well, we're democratic nation with FREE media not like yours. Anyways I'm off now cuz no matter what a person like will you just keep on blabbing.