Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What a joke man.
You didn't respond, because you COULDN'T.
Just like you couldn't respond to all those "Chinese incursions" into Indian soil (even one when Xi Jinping was visiting Modi).
Here is your response to a "Chinese incursion" that lasted over 3 weeks:
Indian troops suspend patrols at Chumar - The Times of India
NEW DELHI: Apart from dismantling a SET of strategically-located bunkers at Chumar as part of an arrangement to end the standoff at Depsang Bulge in eastern Ladakh, the Indian troops seem to have suspended patrols to the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in Chumar, at least for now. Senior officials briefed by personnel on the ground said the Army has discontinued the round-the-clock patrolling it was undertaking in the area for the last few months.
Destroyed your own bunkers, stopped troop patrols to your own territory.
Since you can't do anything, you project that onto others, and assume they can't do anything either. As you found to your detriment when you attacked us in 1962, during our worst ever famine.
And on the day you assume Pakistan won't respond, that will be the end of you. It will start an inevitable chain of escalation, and you know the conclusion to that.
Considering the analogy of Chinese PLA incursions, I take it you admit just like Chinese Govt was behind the incursions Pakistani Govt was behind 26/11 attacks, very bold of you
Are you sure you are on the right thread?Why do you insist on putting words into other people's mouths?
And do not make such a ridiculous claim that the Pakistani government was behind 26/11, since there is ZERO proof of that.
Same as how there is ZERO proof that China gave Pakistan nuclear weapons, like you guys are always crying about.
Are you sure you are on the right thread?
when did I make the claim Pakistani Govt is behind 26/11, it was your reasoning and analogies that insinuated the same
Now trying to backtrack
Considering the analogy of Chinese PLA incursions, I take it you admit just like Chinese Govt was behind the incursions Pakistani Govt was behind 26/11 attacks, very bold of you
Uh, no it wasn't. I never made that claim, you made that claim and attributed it to me. A classic strawman argument.
As you can see it was you who mentioned 26/11 first, even though it was irrelevant to the thread.
How is all of this even relevant to the thread?Anyway, IF it was true that China helped Pakistan get nuclear weapons (to the extent of testing warheads for them.. as is often claimed), doesn't that mean Pakistan would have thermonuclear technology? Since we had that in the 1960's?
For comparison, India's entire arsenal is estimated at 1 megaton in terms of total explosive power.
Whereas a single Chinese thermonuclear warhead has 4 megatons of explosive power. One warhead has more explosive power than India's entire arsenal.
Now if what you guys claim is true, that we passed on nuclear tech to Pakistan (and even tested warheads for them), then doesn't that mean Pakistan has thermonuclear weapons too? In addition to having a vastly larger nuclear arsenal than India does.
Like @Slav Defence said, attempted stealth trolling does not fool anyone. Anyone who has read the thread will see that I made no reference to 26/11 or the Pakistani government being behind it (before you claimed I did).
India and China have "No First Use" policies.
However, Pakistan has a "First Use" policy.
So if India tries that, they are going to come off much worse, due to Pakistan's significantly larger nuclear arsenal.
How all this even relevant to the thread?
What you obviously don't understand is that a 'conventional airstrike on nonstrategic targets' or however you like to sugar coat it, doesn't really mean the same to the other country. It means you are entering their territory. In other words it means war and as the saying goes 'everything is fair in love and war'. Whatever way Pakistan would have decided to respond, nuclear or conventional. You would not have had any place to go crying to or complain. Which is why your high powered delegation thought its better to take advise than to jump into destruction which I would say, was wise of them. Its as simple as that.No! I do not know just as everyone else, how a nuclear response is logical to a conventional airstrike on nonstrategic targets
What you obviously don't understand is that a 'conventional airstrike on nonstrategic targets' or however you like to sugar coat it, doesn't really mean the same to the other country. It means you are entering their territory. In other words it means war and as the saying goes 'everything is fair in love and war'. Whatever way Pakistan would have decided to respond, nuclear or conventional. You would not have had any place to go crying to or complain. Which is why your high powered delegation thought its better to take advise than to jump into destruction which I would say, was wise of them. Its as simple as that.
What a joke man.
You didn't respond, because you COULDN'T.
Just like you couldn't respond to all those "Chinese incursions" into Indian soil (even one when Xi Jinping was visiting Modi).
Here is your response to a "Chinese incursion" that lasted over 3 weeks:
Indian troops suspend patrols at Chumar - The Times of India
NEW DELHI: Apart from dismantling a SET of strategically-located bunkers at Chumar as part of an arrangement to end the standoff at Depsang Bulge in eastern Ladakh, the Indian troops seem to have suspended patrols to the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in Chumar, at least for now. Senior officials briefed by personnel on the ground said the Army has discontinued the round-the-clock patrolling it was undertaking in the area for the last few months.
Destroyed your own bunkers, stopped troop patrols to your own territory.
Since you can't do anything, you project that onto others, and assume they can't do anything either. As you found to your detriment when you attacked us in 1962, during our worst ever famine.
And on the day you assume Pakistan won't respond, that will be the end of you. It will start an inevitable chain of escalation, and you know the conclusion to that.
R u a teenager? CHumar LAC had nothing to do with Chinese incursion - India and China have both an aagreement in place that neither will erect permanent structures in LAC; the Indians put up a tin roof one two that the Chinese objected to as permanent; and so it was taken down. You come and make that out to be some sort of battle of wits and courage? thankfully the teams handling LAC on either side are a bot more matured than that.
But as part of your bravado you seem to have agreed to the LAC plus_minus as India territory.I don't want to get you into trouble so may be you should edit that part before 2nd supervisor takes notice
Apparently you did not read much about that event.
There was a "Chinese incursion" into Indian territory for about 3 weeks, India was crying about it non-stop, and the final result was that India broke their own bunkers and stopped their own troop patrols.
Very good sir. And no I see no need to edit my previous posts, you are welcome to send them along with my IP address to any authority you deem fit, several others have tried before. Make sure you record their response and post it here please, I could do with a good laugh.
Apologies accepted!Sorry I am moving around some stuff to keep on topic.
Nasr was designed on the same basis of Tactical nuclear weapons for NATO, to counter Soviet conventional military superiority. I.e If Indian military enters deep inside Pakistani territory and PA is unable to stop them. However the same would result in full scale nuclear response by India.It's relevant because the border between India and Pakistan is well known for being the "most dangerous border on Earth" (the Economist even had this phrase on their cover).
And platforms like Nasr are designed to lower the nuclear threshold, which makes escalation more likely.
That would be conjecture that Chinese decided to handover Thermonuclear technology. Just like the assumption because China assisted Pakistan in Ballistic missiles, China has also provided ICBM technology to Pakistan as well.So again, if it is true that China helped Pakistan get nuclear weapons, and even tested warheads for them (as is often claimed), doesn't that mean Pakistan would have thermonuclear technology, which we already had in the 1960's?
.In that case, a single thermonuclear warhead has multiple times the explosive power of India's entire arsenal. That's in addition to Pakistan having a vastly larger nuclear arsenal than India in the first place
.The conclusion here is that India would suffer much worse in the event of an escalation.
Chinese never rolled down the Himalayas since 1962, even during 1971 or 1975 , when India did not have nuclear capability, So why will China do so now.Since India has the smallest nuclear arsenal, and they would have reserve at least half of it to deter China from rolling down the Himalayas.
India did not hesitate to take military action on two occasions when Pakistan already had nukes.That is one reason why India seems to be so spineless against Pakistan. Because they know they can't do anything.
I dont think india will get balls for around next 5000 years to actually attack..
@wazApparently you did not read much about that event.
There was a "Chinese incursion" into Indian territory for about 3 weeks, India was crying about it non-stop, and the final result was that India broke their own bunkers and stopped their own troop patrols.
Very good sir. And no I see no need to edit my previous posts, you are welcome to send them along with my IP address to any authority you deem fit, several others have tried before. Make sure you record their response and post it here please, I could do with a good laugh.