India-Pakistan tension can no longer be ignored; Kashmir suffering, says Turkey's Erdogan

[Peaceful Civilian]

Please pardon India and Russia.As Turkey with nato beat the hell outta us. And let's say if India Turkey engage in war. Which Nato country will join against India? If Nato does. And we just have to say Yes to Russia for outright Alliance in all matters.

Russian can't take risk against Nato. Turkish f16 shot down their fighter without warning, Russia didn't take revenge because turkey is part of Nato. We are not talking about Afghanistan or Iraq.
Israel can also go with western countries after pressure, china will remain neutral in any case.

 

[padamchen]

Says The Man Whose PM Is Modi

I voted for Modi. Been pretty happy thus far. That it causes Pakistanis significant consternation only adds to my happiness. I think he will get another term based on his performance thus far.

 

[Samlee]

I voted for Modi. Been pretty happy thus far. That it causes Pakistanis significant consternation only adds to my happiness. I think he will get another term based on his performance thus far.

The Man You Accused Has More Popularity Among The Turkish People Than Modi Will Ever Have Among The Indian People.He Doesn't Cause Anything To Pakistanis Other Than Becoming The But of Rude Jokes

 

[xyxmt]

Please pardon India and Russia.As Turkey with nato beat the hell outta us. And let's say if India Turkey engage in war. Which Nato country will join against India? If Nato does. And we just have to say Yes to Russia for outright Alliance in all matters.

I dount Turkey will need Nato help, ask us we are here for help...naik kam aur pooch pooch

 

[xyxmt]

meanwhile in occupied Kashmir....

View attachment 356901

Even Kashmiris are trolling ... calling Endia lol

 

[baajey]

Great Jammu Massacre Ring Any Bells????

Well now it does. But guess what, I am not being sent to jail for acknowledging that.
A piece of friendly advice:
Batting for someone else is good, but definitely not at the cost of self dignity.

 

[jaunty]

Begani shadi main abdullah dewana, sultan would be well advised not to stick his nose where it doesn't belong! He is pretty irrelevant here.

 

[That Guy]

There is no scope for third party mediation.

In fact, as has been demonstrated increasingly over the past decade, we see no scope for talks or mediation at all.

The thread was specific to Turkey, and it (the source of pontification) was so ridiculous, that it just deserved a slap down. Which is all that it was. Do not read more than that into it. Pakistan is going to have to fight for Kashmir if it wants it. And it is going to get it over our dead bodies.

Except your entire point completely negates this comment of yours. You can deny it all you want, but that doesn't change what you wrote.

No, but because India and Pakistan have agreed to

https://mea.gov.in/in-focus-article.htm?19005/Simla+Agreement+July+2+1972
This was signed by the Late Pakistani President Bhutto and Late Indian PM Gandhi.

and? Times change. If India can't be bothered to follow UN resolutions, Pakistan can't be bothered to follow the Simla Agreement. It's a two way street, give and take.

 

[Samrat420]

and? Times change. If India can't be bothered to follow UN resolutions, Pakistan can't be bothered to follow the Simla Agreement. It's a two way street, give and take.

Does the same yardstick apply to the IWT..? After all, its even older than the Shimla agreement.


BTW, It was Pakistan who refused to adhere to the UN resolutions. You wanted only half of the resolution to be implemented, and conveniently forgot the other half.. Well, sadly for you, the rest of the world doesn't treat international documents in a similar callous fashion.

Until 1972, India wanted the UN resolutions to be implemented (in its entirety, unlike Pakistan). After Shimla agreement, we simply got a legal way to kick UN completely out of the Kashmiri quagmire, and we used that option. Now, it's a bilateral issue and even UN agrees to that..

 

[That Guy]

Does the same yardstick apply to the IWT..? After all, its even older than the Shimla agreement.


BTW, It was Pakistan who refused to adhere to the UN resolutions. You wanted only half of the resolution to be implemented, and conveniently forgot the other half.. Well, sadly for you, the rest of the world doesn't treat international documents in a similar callous fashion.

Until 1972, India wanted the UN resolutions to be implemented (in its entirety, unlike Pakistan). After Shimla agreement, we simply got a legal way to kick UN completely out of the Kashmiri quagmire, and we used that option. Now, it's a bilateral issue and even UN agrees to that..

First of all, IWT is a completely different matter. It does not have an "out", and it can lead to a direct war. Second, nice ignoring my point.

 

[Deadpool]

No Mr Erdogan, neither can repression against Kurds be ignored any more.

 

[Samrat420]

First of all, IWT is a completely different matter. It does not have an "out", and it can lead to a direct war. Second, nice ignoring my point.

I never knew Shimla Agreement had an “out" clause... Would you kindly point it out to me please...

No Mr Erdogan, neither can repression against Kurds be ignored any more.

And niether can the Armenian genocide be swept under the rug.

 

[Lord Of Gondor]

and? Times change. If India can't be bothered to follow UN resolutions, Pakistan can't be bothered to follow the Simla Agreement. It's a two way street, give and take.

You do realise that the UN resolutions are "non-binding"?
And the Simla Accord is an "agreement".

 

[Samrat420]

Second, nice ignoring my point.

What point? You gave two shitty arguments in your last post --

1) That the Shimla Agreement has become old, so its fine to breach it, because you know....times change.. dafuq..!!

2) That it's fine for Pakistan to breach the Shimla Agreement because India breached the UN resolutions.

These above were your two “points ”. I countered them by these arguments respectively ---

★ If Shimla agreement can become breachable simply on the grounds of being a 35 years old treaty, then the same would apply to IWT, which is even older (46 years).

★ Your second argument rests on a lie. You seem to believe that It was India which refused to adhere to UN resolutions, while the truth is completely reverse.. It was actually Pakistan who refused to follow the UN recommendations and wanted only 1 out of the three UN-suggested steps to be taken (that too, only the third step, skipping the first two). Ulta Choir Kotwal ko daante...lol

 

[Armoured Division]

Kashmir is far more peaceful than SE Turkey.
Some 820 Turkish soldiers and cops have been killed by Kurdish fighters ince July 2015.

In the past 12 months Bomb blasts have killed dozens in Turkish towns and cities.

Turkish military mutinied by launching a coup attempt which left around 300 dead and thousands in jail.

Ya, so dumb erdogan should mind his own business.