What's new

India, Pakistan should engage in talks: Bangladeshi experts

Black_cats

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 31, 2010
Messages
10,031
Reaction score
-5
India, Pakistan should engage in talks: Bangladeshi experts
Shahidul Islam Chowdhury | Published: 00:00, Feb 28,2019

http://www.newagebd.net/article/66010/india-pakistan-should-engage-in-talks-bangladeshi-experts


Bangladeshi experts on security and foreign relations on Wednesday observed that India and Pakistan should immediately stop skirmish along their borders and resolve whatever problem they had through talks for greater interests of South Asia.

All countries in South Asia will be adversely affected in multiple aspects, including addressing poverty, attracting foreign investment and trade, if India and Pakistan, two nuclear powers, continue to escalate tension with armed conflicts, they said.

‘Bangladesh will certainly be adversely affected by any scale of armed conflict between India and Pakistan as we are a part of the region,’ said former Bangladesh Army chief M Harun-Ar-Rashid.

Continued armed conflict between India and Pakistan will also create security concerns for Bangladesh, said Harun, also a gallantry award winning freedom fighter. ‘Terrorist outfits maintain tentacles here too and we need to stay alert and keep eye on them,’ he added.

‘Foreign countries see South Asia as a region and assess things from regional perspectives,’ he said, adding that Bangladesh’s import from India will be hampered.

Indian Border Security Force has issued an alert along border with Bangladesh amid volatile situation along the borders of the country with Pakistan, according to several Indian media.

The Bangladesh government is, however, yet to make any statement on the ongoing skirmish between Indai and Pakistan.

Bangladesh Enterprise Institute acting president M Humayun Kabir warned that entire South Asia would be adversely affected if India and Pakistan continued skirmish for a longer period.

Anything between India and Pakistan ‘compel us [Bangladesh] to take a position which does not serve our own interests,’ said Kabir, also former foreign secretary.
Poverty is a common enemy in South Asian countries, he said, adding
that all the countries should avoid conflict at all levels.

Dhaka University international relations professor Imtiaz Ahmed said that the two countries must deescalate armed
conflicts as skirmishes had already began to affect the region as several airlines stopped their flights, some airports were shut down and many flights were rerouted.

The two nuclear powers cannot afford to engage in full scale war which will eventually pollute the entire region, he said.

Bangladesh Institute of International and Strategic Studies chairman Munshi Faiz Ahmad said that armed conflicts and war would serve interests of none of India and Pakistan, let along other countries in South Asia.

Only arms producers and traders, local and foreign quarters which spread fear and jingoism, will be in favour of war and armed conflict, he said, adding that resources used to procure arms and weapons could be spent for fulfilling people’s basic needs.

These two countries could try for creative ideas to resolve crisis what they have been nurturing for over seven decades, he added.

They hoped that the two feuding countries would begin negotiations at the earliest as Pakistan prime minister Imran Khan already offered to resolve the crisis through talks.
 
. . .
We started SAARC in any case.

I believe we are ideally placed for negotiating peace between the two countries.

A stable South Asia (as a result of arms de-escalation) is a definite pre-requisite for the uplift of poor people in South Asia. Trillions could be saved from not buying useless weapons.

The only losers will be the military industrial complex (including politician crooks in both India/Pakistan and some foreign countries in the West involved in the arms trade), but local leaders can still make windfall profits in other peacetime industrialization and export efforts by utilizing their populace...everyone can live better because countries don't need to be armed to the teeth. This stupid one-upping each other with arms has gone on too damn long. The sheeple population in both these countries get duped all the time by drinking nationalist cool aid by their respective leaders who are mostly crooks.

I don't see this de-escalation as a problem for China either. Peace helps everyone except those who wish to fish in muddy waters. China would welcome this de-escalation.
 
Last edited:
. .
Air strikes on Pak will help BJP in Lok Sabha polls: BS Yeddyurappa
28 Feb 2019, 10:30AM ISTSource: Times Now
Senior BJP leader BS Yeddyurappa stoked a controversy, saying that “air strikes on a terror camp in Pakistan’s Balakot on Tuesday has created a wave in favour of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.” He said it would help the saffron party win over 22 of the 28 seats in Karnataka during upcoming Lok Sabha polls due by May. The opposition parties already blamed the ruling BJP at Centre for politicising the martyrdom of soldiers. On the other hand, senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley said the opposition should “introspect” about their statement.

Read more

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...a-polls-bs-yeddyurappa/videoshow/68196110.cms
 
. .
SAARC is an useless organization...

When SAARC was formed by Ziaur Rahman, the intent was extremely noble, a small South Asian govt. free trade organization. SAFTA ( South Asian Free Trade Area) was formed in 2006.

The reason SAARC did not succeed is because of distrust of some member countries (Pakistan) who thought that India will dominate and benefit more from this grouping than other smaller countries.

In hindsight Pakistan should have given SAARC a chance. They still can.
 
. .
I wonder in any other civilized country like Pakistan or US if a leader impose war he looses votes in elections but in India people votes you if you do war no matter how many poor soldiers die.

thanks shame!!
 
.
We started SAARC in any case.

I believe we are ideally placed for negotiating peace between the two countries.

A stable South Asia (as a result of arms de-escalation) is a definite pre-requisite for the uplift of poor people in South Asia. Trillions could be saved from not buying useless weapons.

The only losers will be the military industrial complex in both countries (and some foreign countries in the West involved in the arms trade), but local leaders can still make windfall profit in other peacetime industrialization and export efforts by utilizing their populace...

I don't see this as a problem for China either. Peace helps everyone except those who wish to fish in muddy waters.

How can you even say that you are ideally placed to negotiate peace between India and Pakistan with a straight face are you being sarcastic...
 
.
We started SAARC in any case.

I believe we are ideally placed for negotiating peace between the two countries.

A stable South Asia (as a result of arms de-escalation) is a definite pre-requisite for the uplift of poor people in South Asia. Trillions could be saved from not buying useless weapons.

The only losers will be the military industrial complex in both countries (and some foreign countries in the West involved in the arms trade), but local leaders can still make windfall profit in other peacetime industrialization and export efforts by utilizing their populace...

I don't see this as a problem for China either. Peace helps everyone except those who wish to fish in muddy waters.

Frankly this is nonsense. BD can do nothing about India-pakistan conflict, neither should we have any interest. We are a nobody in this and the conflict zone is too far away.
 
.
We r watching the situation closely. We have no interest in these stupid showoffs.

We r only worried about the fact that it might make the whole region unstable which will hamper our economic growth.

Both of India and Pak knows that they r good as defending unit but poor at attacking. Their whole military strategy is based around defense.

Hence, neither party will not get involved in anything especially considering the fact both have nuclear weapons in their arsenal.
 
. . .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom