Track record? HaHaHa
I have to deflate your smugness shred your post to pieces
Where should I start?
1. Partition? The creation of independent state of Pakistan on the bases of their democratic choice and human right. That is the fact that
fascist maha bharat shouting zealots are still finding hard to come terms to. Pathetic for India that a country which is 1/5th of its size is able to refuse Indian Hegemony? Every moment of existence of Pakistan is a slap on the face of Maha-Bharat lunacy.
Using term fascist clearly explains what knowledge you have about the partition.
For brushing off that hearsay stories propagated among your circles,i'd recommend you to watch a Najam Sethi's talk on the partition.
Also read Jaswant Singh's book "Jinnah, Partition and Independence"
I won't go deep on this partition issue as only 3 days ago your nation became 63 and the next day my nation.The issue of partition is obsolete.
2. Freedom struggles within India. Kashmiris, Shiekhs, Naxils and many more show the same dismay towards the Indian state so there is symmetry that people are fed up with Indian state.
Shieks? didn't know Arabs were claiming our land
,if you meant Sikhs you can ask some the Indian Sikh members here on that issue.
Naxils?
For the zillionth time and again ,the Naxals and Maoist want to change the Govt not separate from India.
3. Neighbouring relations. There is not even a single country which doesn’t have border, water or political dispute of the over bearing & opportunist India be it Bangladesh, be it land locked Nepal which is coerced into trading with India & any attempt by that poor state for direct trade with other nations is frowned upon by Delhi.
Its a colonial legacy,We didn't choose those lines drawn on the map.We just accepted them.
Anyway,I"ll agree with your statement on Nepal(mostly on military sales).Nepal-India is analogous to Pakistan-Afghanistan relation.But unlike you we don't continue to misuse our role we have for Nepal.
4. Bangladesh? Oh you say that breaking up Pakistan is to Indian’s credit? Well it has more to do with the desire of the Bengalis to be independent it was going to happen anyway with or without the Indian help. For the sake of track record Bangladesh should have rejoined with India, but it became an independent state, strengthening the argument for partition. What is more both Pakistan & Bangladesh enjoy far closer ties than India wants. Our military exchanges officers which is a testament of our friendship.
Without Indian military intervention Bangladesh would have been a dead end like independent Baluchistan or LTTE's ambitions, of course the desire of Bengalis was the primary catalyst and promoter.
5. LTTE. Lets talk about the Indian intervention in Sirilanka, its fight against LLTE (which it was originally supporting) its losses against the tigers & eventual humiliating withdrawal and eventual loss of a former prime minister is hardly a track record worth aspiring to.
Yes!We learnt from our mistakes of how supporting separatists like Kachin rebels or LTTE has consequences in bilateral relations also more importantly the impact on our own soil.However,unlike us some of your military and ISI people still continue to think of LET and Taliban as a strategic asset.
6. 1962 war. Dare I mention this war? Or the so called “track record” doesn’t apply here? The kind of humiliation India had lives today after loosing thousands of troops and land to China. The usual intervention & subversive activities of Indians in Tibet backfired so badly that from that day Indian decided only to take on other countries that are much smaller in size.
Only people of your nation who have deficiency, when it comes to military triumphs regarding India ,and derive immense pleasure from India's defeat.you seek to associate with 1962 and brand it as "humiliation".We paid a price for underestimating our enemy then.But the lessons learnt are clearly visible in future military encounters 1967,1971,1984,1987,1999.Besides,where do you get your info from?telepathic connection with Ahmed qurashi and Zaid Hamid?India recognized Tibet in 1953 aslo there were no territorial changes after 1962 war.
7. Balochistan Don’t shed crocodile tears for Balochis. This is no war of independence it is a tribal conflict of few sardars of Mari & bughti tribes that has taken a form of a sustained insurgencies thanks to the Indian “cultural centres” along the Afghan borders.
It is nothing but outright arrogance & selfish thugary of these tribal chiefs who don’t want development or exploration in their areas because it means prosperity, education & improvement in the quality of life of the people under them which can result in weakening of their stranglehold on those poor Balochs. Their so called independence struggle is as bona fide as those of the Rwandan, Somalian or Cambodian warlords.
Baluchistan is just a backup for India.In case your nation pulls military stunt like 1965 on Kashmir again,We"ll do the same in Baluchistan.
The BLA terrorists are the biggest killers of the very own people they claim to represent. Many Baloch tribes and families have had to seek refuge in Sindh & Punjab because they refused to accept the dictates of these sardars. The same Punjabis are giving shelter to these poor people that the terrorists (with the Indian moral support of weapons & money) are busy killing. Someone tell me that how killing university professors, journalists and doctors and destroying schools or dispensary falls in the category of interdependence or struggle for rights?
As a Balochi you must know more about what you"re talking,my statement regarding Baluchistan is already mentioned above..
Brahamdagh Bugti can travel on Indian passports or can oversee the training & funding of the terrorists in the “Indian cultural” centres along the uninhabited & remote areas of Pak Afghan border but he will have the same fate like Akbar Bughti and Prabhakaran of LLTE. The Indian conspiracy was successful in Bangladesh because of its remoteness from the rest of Pakistan but that’s not the case with Balochistan.
Just be happy that Bangladesh is not your neighbour or you'd be having serious trouble(proxy wars,territorial disputes,bad relations,genocide claims,war crime trials etc) with them since 1971 and with Indian support ensuring nothing radical can take place the issue will continue to be a headache for the Pak Govt.Like you said "that’s not the case with Balochistan".
Also,I"ll admit Indian presence is there in Baluchistan but not involvement.Even that you"ve not been able to prove to the world.
Conclusion It is high time that India gives more attention to the plight of ethnic & religious minorities if it wants to prove it self to be the biggest democracy of the world. Leave Balochistan to its people. The current terrorism in Balochistan is more about the self interest of some Baloch tribal Chiefs where the state has refused to allow them to continue to extort, blackmail & threaten the private and public companies operating in the area. India should spare few tears for the Dalits, Muslims & Christians that continue to fall victim to the |Hindu extremist organisations.
Judging your conclusion even on 93rd August 14th .your notion of evil Brahmin Hindu India will continue remain firmly cemented just as it is today.
PS:On the whole,if the point of your post was to prove where your loyalty lies to fellow Pakistani members then just ignore my post.Good for you.
