'India only gives moral support to Balochistan'

[foxbat]

and Kashmiries too!

Please stick to the topic. Balochistan..

 

[Spring Onion]

You would be naive to think that Pak's fight is confined to Kashmr. The fight has been beyond Kashmir for a long time now. From the terrorist attacks to harboring criminals like Dawood Ibrahim, GoP crossed that line long back.

Kashmir is not part of India so no question of bringing it in.

2, Dawood Ibrahim is an India and his strength is his strong stretched Underworld in India which India failed to bust or crack. Thats not our problem.

3. The last time we saw Dawood was harboured by UAE and there is NO prove of his presence in Pakistan even now.

 

[airuah]

to the indians here....do you think we should start a thread called "pakistan's involvement in terrorism- allegations and proofs from around the world" and post every everything and cite as references for the "proof" that they ask everytime like they have not read it before . it would be easier to site the thread . besides if pakistan wants to site any indian involvement they can have their own thread...

 

[Spring Onion]

well India need like her

mmmm But the days of Indira's cross border state terrorism are over

 

[airuah]

mmmm But the days of Indira's cross border state terrorism are over

exactly !!!!!its only pakistan thats totally involved in terrorism now!!!!

 

[True_Pakistan_Zindabad]

How we know about Indian involvement in Baloch terrorism :

1. Indian made weaponry uncommon to Pakistan found on terrorists

Rehman Malik :
"We are not levelling mere allegations against India but we have solid evidence of Indian involvement in Balochistan. The weapons recovered from various areas were Indian-made"

2. Bodies of militants - The army thinks many corpses are of Nepalese origin (Gurkhas) I presume DNA testing was also involved.

3. The Afghan-Pak border intrusions are a gateway to all militancy.

 

[amit30]

If in any Kashmir related thread any Indian start to disscuss Baluchistan so mod act as that was offtopic post but where is mod now ...


cause this is Baluchistan related thread so why kashmir allowed here

 

[you are fired]

Kashmir is not part of India so no question of bringing it in.

.

well dear Kashmir is a part of India where you accept or not when you guys understand hate will not give any thing to you now your own terrorist are killing your citizen



i meet few Baluch peoples and they told me how Punjabi are using them as second class citizen

 

[you are fired]

How we know about Indian involvement in Baloch terrorism :

1. Indian made weaponry uncommon to Pakistan found on terrorists

Rehman Malik :
"We are not levelling mere allegations against India but we have solid evidence of Indian involvement in Balochistan. The weapons recovered from various areas were Indian-made"

and the second day he refused any proof if he has anything why not show in UN but there is nothing to show

2. Bodies of militants - The army thinks many corpses are of Nepalese origin (Gurkhas) I presume DNA testing was also involved.

do you mean Nepal is part of India

3. The Afghan-Pak border intrusions are a gateway to all militancy.

 

[True_Pakistan_Zindabad]

do you mean Nepal is part of India

No but the large Nepalese population in the north is a recruiting ground for Gurkha soldiers.

 

[gurjot]

Kashmir is not part of India so no question of bringing it in.

2, Dawood Ibrahim is an India and his strength is his strong stretched Underworld in India which India failed to bust or crack. Thats not our problem.

3. The last time we saw Dawood was harboured by UAE and there is NO prove of his presence in Pakistan even now.

Kashmir is not part of India so no question of bringing it in.

madam ji c the reality.

 

[True_Pakistan_Zindabad]

and the second day he refused any proof if he has anything why not show in UN but there is nothing to show

How do you know we didn't show anyone proof especially Indian made weapons recovered would have easily been documented and presented to any neutral party.

 

[foxbat]

How we know about Indian involvement in Baloch terrorism :

1. Indian made weaponry uncommon to Pakistan found on terrorists

Rehman Malik :
"We are not levelling mere allegations against India but we have solid evidence of Indian involvement in Balochistan. The weapons recovered from various areas were Indian-made"

2. Bodies of militants - The army thinks many corpses are of Nepalese origin (Gurkhas) I presume DNA testing was also involved.

3. The Afghan-Pak border intrusions are a gateway to all militancy.

Why is your govt reluctant to share the details with India if Mr Malik is so confident. Though from the statements, it does not look like..

I presume, ...
The army thinks...

all statements with open backdoors..

 

[you are fired]

mmmm But the days of Indira's cross border state terrorism are over

so funny you are

do you know how many bd peoples were killed by Pakistani army and raped bd women

 

[Spring Onion]

If in any Kashmir related thread any Indian start to disscuss Baluchistan so mod act as that was offtopic post but where is mod now ...


cause this is Baluchistan related thread so why kashmir allowed here

Indeed this thread is not related to Kashmir neither Kashmir can be compared to Balochistan because Balochistan is Part of Pakistan under International and UN laws whereas Kashmir is an occupied territory.


I guess the Indian members brought Kashmir into discussion to justify Indian terrorism in Balochistan