What's new

India not to criminalise marital rape

Koovie

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
8,288
Reaction score
6
Utterly disgusting reasoning... if it happens without consent, its rape and a crime!

India not to criminalise marital rape

India will not make marital rape a crime because of cultural and religious values and society’s belief that marriage is a sacrament, the government said on Wednesday.

DMK MP Kanimozhi, through a question submitted in the Rajya Sabha, asked Minister of State for Home Affairs Haribhai Parathibhai Chaudhary whether the government would bring in an amending Bill to the Indian Penal Code to remove the exception of marital rape from the definition of rape in the light of the U.N. agencies’ findings and recommendations.

Mr. Chaudhary, in his written reply, said that while the U.N. Committee on Elimination of Discrimination against Women had recommended that India criminalise marital rape, India’s Law Commission had not recommended this, and the government had no plan to bring in an amendment.

“It is considered that the concept of marital rape, as understood internationally, cannot be suitably applied in the Indian context due to various factors — e.g. level of education/illiteracy, poverty, myriad social customs and values, religious beliefs, mindset of society to treat marriage as a sacrament, etc,” Mr. Chaudhary said.

“I accept that the institution of marriage is an integral part of our social structure. Many people across many faiths hold it sacred. But it has not stopped us from bringing the anti-dowry law or domestic violence legislation,” Ms. Kanimozhi told The Hindu.

“Today, we are more receptive to women’s rights and issues. This is not against our culture. It is about protecting our women from violence and abuse,” she said. She has also introduced a Private Member Bill seeking the removal of the marital rape exception from the Indian Penal Code.

While Mr. Chaudhary’s reply referred to the Law Commission’s report of 2000, it did not talk of the more recent Justice Verma Committee report of 2013 on sexual violence laws which said that the exemption for marital rape “stems from a long out-dated notion of marriage which regarded wives as no more than the property of their husbands” and recommended the removal of the marital rape exception. However the Criminal Law Amendment passed by the UPA following the report also avoided the marital rape question.

This was against the principle of upholding a woman’s bodily integrity which underlay the amendment, senior lawyer Vrinda Grover said. “Marriage rituals may be sacred under religious beliefs, but rights of the husband and wife, adoption, and divorce are all governed by statutory law,” Ms. Grover said. “The Domestic Violence Act recognises sexual abuse in a marital relationship but only offers civil remedies. The reason they are not willing to make it a criminal offence is because Parliament is full of patriarchal and conservative people,” she added.

According to the last National Family Health Survey, just 2.3 per cent of all sexual violence reported by women to household surveyors was by men other than their husbands.


Govt. has no plans to criminalise marital rape - The Hindu
 
.

CD2pdFIVEAAcfGN.jpg
 
. . .
You guys need to address the real broad daylight rape first, then think about marital rape.
 
. . .
The only Sati practiced by the elite in India was the Sikhs. Ranjith Singh's wives became Sati on his funeral pyre. So it was more of a Sikh and Bengali thing.

Typical hind lies.

Due to Vedic injunction, a Brahmin woman should not follow her husband in death, but for the other social classes, tradition holds this to be the supreme Law of Women... when a woman of Brahmin caste follows her husband in death, by killing herself she leaders neither herself nor her husband to heaven."[151]

Sati (practice) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It's a religious commandment for your kind
 
. . .
Seriously don't BS. Satti was a hindu practice and not practiced by elites only. Lets hope that is not being done in todays world.

Show us one Hindu queen who committed Sati. Bengal and Orissa had the practice of Sati. Rajasthan had Jauhar which was different than Sati and mostly to avoid capture and enslavement during war. The rest of India had no Sati system.

All the Hindu queens of note you see are widows from Ahilyabhai Holkar to Rani Laxmibhai. None of them ever committed Sati.

You do not have to hope very hard that women are not committing Sati. All you have to do is dig up facts. There was one case of Sati almost 30 years ago.

Seriously don't BS. Satti was a hindu practice and not practiced by elites only. Lets hope that is not being done in todays world.

If Sati was a Hindu system then why Ranjith Singh's wives and entire harem commit Sati? I thought Maharaj Ranjith Singh was Sikh pride.

Typical hind lies.

Due to Vedic injunction, a Brahmin woman should not follow her husband in death, but for the other social classes, tradition holds this to be the supreme Law of Women... when a woman of Brahmin caste follows her husband in death, by killing herself she leaders neither herself nor her husband to heaven."[151]

Sati (practice) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It's a religious commandment for your kind

You turd breath, there is no such law in Hinduism.
 
. .
I will agree to criminalize marital rape once feminazis fight to make demand for new jewelry, shopping, dinner at fancy restaurants, vacation trips to be declared as blackmailing and extortion by wife.
 
Last edited:
.
Typical hind lies.

Due to Vedic injunction, a Brahmin woman should not follow her husband in death, but for the other social classes, tradition holds this to be the supreme Law of Women... when a woman of Brahmin caste follows her husband in death, by killing herself she leaders neither herself nor her husband to heaven."[151]

Sati (practice) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It's a religious commandment for your kind

So a Christian and an Non-Indian, David Brick is the expert on Hinduism ? :lol:

Maybe Jesus is then an Indian god and US is holy land :P

The largest number of Sati was from the Sikhs and from the Rajputs. See the link to Islamic invasion ? Second highest from Bengal (now Bangladesh), see the islamic link again ?

Most Sati was done by royalty and you hardly find sati in south India where islamic invasion was weakest.

Seriously don't BS. Satti was a hindu practice and not practiced by elites only. Lets hope that is not being done in todays world.

Rubbish. Sati was a social practice as a reaction to Islamic invasion and tendency of invaders to RAPE and take SLAVES as permitted under islam.

Worry about under-age pregnancy in christian nations first.


I am glad the govt. took a bold and enlightened stand on Marital Rape. Its about time we took decisions based on our own heritage and culture, rather than blindly aping the western Christian barbarians.
 
.
Rubbish. Sati was a social practice as a reaction to Islamic invasion and tendency of invaders to RAPE and take SLAVES as permitted under islam.

Sati was not due to Islamic invasion. The term for it is Jauhar. Where all the women of Rajput clan commit mass suicide while their men marched out to fight the enemy to the last man standing.

Sati is death on husband's funeral pyre. Mostly a Bengali and Sikh practice. I suspect an element of property ownership tussles in Bengal which led to encouragement to Sati system there.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom