India mob kill two Muslim men over suspected cow theft

[TISSOT]

They died. Thats not the same as slapping a thief.

Villagers killing thieves is a net negative for the system, not positive. This worsens law and order, does not improve it.

Just a thrashing and nobody would have said anything. They died means it was more than a thrashing. Actions have consequences. Murdering someone under any reason is a crime. My uncle looted my dads crores and the law failed us. If i kill my uncle i am still a murderer.

LOL.... why would that fact that they died indicated anything "more than a thrashing" ?

Even that guy in Rajasthan died due to thrashing.

BTW this kind of death is called INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER i.e a death that is caused "without criminal intent" and as such the "perp" gets away with a slap on the wrist.

If you plot to kill your uncle and killl him, its first degree murder

LOL at your pathetic attempt to compare the two when you do not even know the basic premise of the law.

Typical "secular intellectual".

 

[footmarks]

No they can't.

Yes they can.

The best they can do is to start cow farms and start selling these gaos to Hindus and hindutva groups for worship.

That's a good idea.

Let the gaos flourish and thrive in Hindu India.

As far as eating beef Muslims should replace it with fish and chickens. BUT wait the Hindus have a problem with masaharis of any kind so what to do ?

That's not true. Many of the Hindus are non-vegetarians, even the upper caste ones.

 

[Stag112]

LOL.... why would that fact that they died indicated anything "more than a thrashing" ?

Even that guy in Rajasthan died due to thrashing.

BTW this kind of death is called INVOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER i.e a death that is caused "without criminal intent" and as such the "perp" gets away with a slap on the wrist.

If you plot to kill your uncle and killl him, its first degree murder

LOL at your pathetic attempt to compare the two when you do not even know the basic premise of the law.

Typical "secular intellectual".

Involuntary manslaughter has a punishment of upto 10 years. If that is slap on the wrist for you, I am ok with that.

Gravity of a crime is judged by law. There is judgement involved. If i thrash a thief and he gets a swollen face is considered differently than this case, where both died, showing the gravity of crime.

I am a grade 1 Modi bhakt. And reading your tone and manners I realised who is bringing us a bad name.

 

[TISSOT]

Involuntary manslaughter has a punishment of upto 10 years. If that is slap on the wrist for you, I am ok with that.

Gravity of a crime is judged by law. There is judgement involved. If i thrash a thief and he gets a swollen face is considered differently than this case, where both died, showing the gravity of crime.

I am a grade 1 Modi bhakt. And reading your tone and manners I realised who is bringing us a bad name.

LOL. You are giving the MAXIMUM punishment for involuntary manslaughter, the state can drops the prosecution if it finds no criminal intent or negligence.

EVEN if they are persecuted, then minimum punishment is either 12 months in prison or a FINE and probation.

Before considering the "gravity of the crime", they state will consider IF there is a crime and IF that crime can be prosecuted. Poor cattle farmers who are victims of theft are not likely candidates for prosecution unless one is demanding "islamic justice" for political reasons or Blackmail by the Police.


I don't give a $hit if you are grade 1 or grade 2 Modi bhakt.

In my view, its stupid people who give Indians a bad name and you have clearly demonstrated your abilities (or lack of them).

 

[Stag112]

LOL. You are giving the MAXIMUM punishment for involuntary manslaughter, the state can drops the prosecution if it finds no criminal intent or negligence.

EVEN if they are persecuted, then minimum punishment is either 12 months in prison or a FINE and probation.

Before considering the "gravity of the crime", they state will consider IF there is a crime and IF that crime can be prosecuted. Poor cattle farmers who are victims of theft are not likely candidates for prosecution unless one is demanding "islamic justice" for political reasons or Blackmail by the Police.


I don't give a $hit if you are grade 1 or grade 2 Modi bhakt.

In my view, its stupid people who give Indians a bad name and you have clearly demonstrated your abilities (or lack of them).

When they raised their hand except for in self defence, there was criminal intent.

The law is clear. You are confused.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

In Pakistan we have Markhor as our national animal. In India they should declare cow as their national animal and it's life worth more then human, all the problems will be solved as everyone will know their place.

 

[TISSOT]

When they raised their hand except for in self defence, there was criminal intent.

The law is clear. You are confused.

Their Right to Livelihood guaranteed by Article 21of the Constitution was threatened by these criminals who tried to steal his livelihood.

SO it was VERY MUCH in Self Defense and This type of unintentional homicide is NOT A CRIME.

So yes, the LAW IS CLEAR, only you do not know the law.

In Pakistan we have Markhor as our national animal. In India they should declare cow as their national animal and it's life worth more then human, all the problems will be solved as everyone will know their place.

LOL..... cow has bee sacred in India for more than 10,000 years ..... so you really think people do not know their place ?

 

[Stag112]

Their Right to Livelihood guaranteed by Article 21of the Constitution was threatened by these criminals who tried to steal his livelihood.

SO it was VERY MUCH in Self Defense and This type of unintentional homicide is NOT A CRIME.

So yes, the LAW IS CLEAR, only you do not know the law.



LOL..... cow has bee sacred in India for more than 10,000 years ..... so you really think people do not know their place ?

No court on earth will accept your stretched definition of self defence. There is nothing to debate if you are going to murder law, logic, reason all at once.

 

[Clutch]

LOL..... so they were trying to steal cows and those thief's were beaten to death ?

Welcome to Desi village justice. Moral of the story, DON'T STEAL.

Suspected thieves being killed in a public mob lynching ..

Their Right to Livelihood guaranteed by Article 21of the Constitution was threatened by these criminals who tried to steal his livelihood.

SO it was VERY MUCH in Self Defense and This type of unintentional homicide is NOT A CRIME.

So yes, the LAW IS CLEAR, only you do not know the law.



LOL..... cow has bee sacred in India for more than 10,000 years ..... so you really think people do not know their place ?

Indian blasphemy law?

 

[Taimoor Khan]

LOL..... cow has bee sacred in India for more than 10,000 years ..... so you really think people do not know their place ?

There was no India 10000 years ago so you started your argument on flimsy grounds. Plus most of the known recent history going back 1000 years of sub continent is dominated by Muslims and their rules with the Hindus living under their thumb. Eating Cow steaks were never an issue in a place which is now refer to as India.

So, NO. People don't know their place. The Modi Hindu terrorist brigade needs to pass laws and make it official.

 

[Stag112]

They just killed two innocent people transporting their own cows.

Can indian muslims arm themselves in India?

You keep pulling stuff out your backside. You are a shameless liar who feels nothing but glee at anyones pain. When non muslims die it makes you happy because you hate them and when muslims do you jump with joy as it validates your happiness at others suffering. What a pathetic existence.

 

[Manama]

Pakistan and India are like sisters with the same upbringing, both are intolerant, with weird extreme laws with killing people in the name of beliefs being the norm.

 

[Azadkashmir]

indians care alot for cows can a dalit get the same treatment

 

[Nefarious]

God doesn't need protection from man.

 

[TISSOT]

No court on earth will accept your stretched definition of self defence. There is nothing to debate if you are going to murder law, logic, reason all at once.

There is nothing to debate because neither do you know the law nor do you understand the spirit of the law.

Right to Self Defence is an inalienable right guaranteed by the Law.

In this case the victims of cow theft attacked the thieves for the purpose of self-defence of his livelihood and used force, but on account of error of judgement or due to loss of self-control in the heat of the moment or suddenness of the affair causes more harm than is necessary.

If the thieves were running away with his cows then use of force is justified in self defense and can even be used in pursuit of the thieves.

The temperament of the assailant is one of the prime considerations and is judged from all the surrounding circumstances, such as the reputation of the deceased for a violent, dangerous or turbulent disposition and the existence of tension of feeling and initial malice at the time of occurrence.

The presence or absence of Male Fides make all the difference.

In this case the victims were attacked by Thieves and their property stolen and any action was in self defense. The state has the discretion to let this pass.

There was no India 10000 years ago so you started your argument on flimsy grounds. Plus most of the known recent history going back 1000 years of sub continent is dominated by Muslims and their rules with the Hindus living under their thumb. Eating Cow steaks were never an issue in a place which is now refer to as India.

So, NO. People don't know their place. The Modi Hindu terrorist brigade needs to pass laws and make it official.

LOL...absolute rubbish.

Cow slaughter was BANNED under the Mughal rule

It was the BRITISH who started Cow slaughter in India.