Ok u r all over the place but I'll try to categorically address each point u raised.
If Partition had not happened, babri masjid ,Gujarat massacre etc would not have happened. By creating Pakistan and genociding Hindus in operation search light, and using armed jihad in Kashmir, Muslims have given right leaning Hindus and motivation reasons to do babri and Gujarat. Actually these are very small compared to your deeds. It took a Modi and Hindutwa to make some people realize the value of secular Hindus.
Do u understand what u r saying here? How's Gujarat Massacre, Babri Masjid incident related to the creation of Pakistan? It was done entirely by Indians long after Pakistan had been created. Pakistan had no part to play in that. Have some sound reasoning and I'll debate over that. What u r saying here makes no sense.
As for that last paragraph let's assume that all of that is small compared to "our deeds" and Pakistan is "evil" and Hindus r persecuted here. Should u be using that as a reason to kill/persecute ur own Muslim citizens? It's like me saying "well there are all these other bank robbers so it's only fair that I rob a bank too". That is some insane reasoning.
Also I will say it again that Pakistan was created for the sake of Islam/Muslims. It declared itself an Islamic Republic so u highlighting the fact that Islam/Muslims r favored in Pak is no argument at all. That was the purpose of it and it fulfilled it.
In contrast ur leaders championed the idea of Hindu/Muslim harmony and a united India. So when u provide justification in any form or manner of a Hindu India(rather than secular India), u go against ur forefathers who created a secular India. It's basically u admitting that "yes Jinnah and others were right and Muslims and Hindus must have separate country's so they can freely practice their religions". In that case u guys should just declare India a Hindu state. Why beat around the bush?
Again you are wrong, wheather TNT is right or wrong India was partitioned in the name of protecting Islam. But after securing a nation you made Pakistan an Islamic republic and started persecution of Hindus and other minorities. Today in your Islamic republic there are barely any Hindus left. Hindus had had full faith in secularism and Humanity till Pakistan and Bangladesh started wiping out Hindus. Still we followed Nehru with half hearts and made a secular contitution. We thought Muslims would understand our magnanimity and sentiments. Then we saw genocide of Hindus in Bangladesh operation search light. Kashmir a Muslim majority area wants to cede after removing it's minority. Muslims in India have no other choice than being Indian and secular, their situation automatically makes them Indian democratic and secular. 90% Muslims of India followed Jinnah and voted for Pakistan. Partition was done under British rule, another partition is not possible. Weather TNT is right or wrong 90% Muslims in Indian subcontinent believed in TNT. Even Muslims in India collude with Pakistan. There is no reason left for Hindus to believe in secularism.
Here again u r providing that same justification that really shouldn't be a justification for any sane person. Let's assume it to be true that Pakistan/Pakistanis are evil and they persecute/kill Hindus in their country. U want to use that to persecute/kill Muslims in India?
Another thing is that u grouping together all the Muslims of the subcontinent(Pakistani, Indian, Kashmiri, Bangladeshi Muslims). Do u know of the history of partition? There were many groups of Muslims who held differing political viewpoints. A majority of them were in favor of creation of Pakistan(they ended up in Pakistan and Bangladesh) but there was still a sizeable group of Muslims that bought into the idea of a secular India that shouldn't be divided. A majority of Muslims in India r those who favored a united India. It is wrong of u to lump these groups together. U r also saying that the Muslims of India have to be secular bcuz they have no choice and that they collude with Pak. Those r some serious accusations against ur fellow countrymen. Like I said read the history of partition and u will see that these Indian Muslims that u r accusing just bcuz they have a different faith than u, voted in favor of a united India and against Pak. This is why Muslims in India feel that they have to prove their Indian-ness to their fellow Hindus. U r biased against them.
As for ur last line above if u think that there is no reason to believe in secularism then why not own it? India should declare that Nehru's vision was wrong and India isn't going to be secular but rather a Hindu state. Then by all means u can protect cows and ban beef. Anyone who has a problem with such a law can leave the country.
Muslims have persecuted millions of Hindus and other polytheists in the name of one God. Muslims in India don't stop Hindus from worshipping idols because they are powerless not because they genuinely don't want to. Where Muslims can for example in Pakistan, already Hindus freedom is restricted.
Again u r using the flawed logic of "if he broke the law then why can't I?". On top of that u r again accusing ur fellow countrymen of something which they haven't done just bcuz they r Muslims. That's just sad and pathetic.
U have never once condemned the actions of these murderers who r killing Muslims over beef issue. Instead u r accusing ur fellow Indian Muslims of a crime they have not committed.
If Muslims were out to get u like the boogeyman u think them to be they would've already wiped Hindus off the face of the earth during the centuries of rule(before British) over the subcontinent.
God stopped Abraham before he actually sacrificed his son, God just wanted to test resolve of Abraham. Current Islamic practice is continuation of previous pre- Islamic Arab religion. Sacrificing an animal and consuming it's meat is not sacrifice by any logic. Hindus also do animal sacrifice search Gadhimai festival. In ancient India there were many droughts, after generations of Hindus survived droughts by consuming milk. Hindus started to avoid unnecessary killing of these animals. Muslims see this as a opportunity to get cheap meat.
Please don't try to teach me Islam when u don't even know it urself. God was indeed testing Abraham's resolve and instead of Abraham's son there was a lamb that was sacrificed instead. That's where the sacrificing of a Halal animal comes from.
The current Islamic practices are not at all continuations of pre Islamic Arab practices. In fact practices in Hinduism are more similar to those pre Islamic Arab practices than anything else. Pre-Islamic Arabs were polytheists and just like the Gadhimai Festival, pre Islamic Arabs also sacrificed animals to their gods.
If u r gonna argue with me about Islam at least study it a bit.
