Why di you think then the Chinese never tried a single misadventure against India after 62!!?? They wanted Arunachal right?? Is itvtheirs? No. Then why go to war in the first place. I do not watch Bollywood movies mate. Hence I dont know what they arevall about nowadays, its you guys who are diehard fans of those crappy movies. You know what happened in 99? The US literally threatened India that th Pakistanis would go Nuclear if we continue our beating and the Pakistanis anticipated that the way things were going we might cross the loc. I dont know from where you get your info. Here's what Wikipedia has to say aboutvthe war in 99. Now Pakistanis usually dismiss anything which is not in their favor as a lie. If You have similar sentiments about the below piece than I urge You to kindly change it to suite your narrative and see what Wikipedia would have to say.
Pakistan was criticised by other countries for instigating the war, as its paramilitary forces and
insurgents crossed the
Line of Control.Pakistan's primary diplomatic response, one of
plausible deniability linking the incursion to what it officially termed as "Kashmiri
freedom fighters", was in the end not successful. Veteran analysts argued that the battle was fought at heights where only seasoned troops could survive, so poorly equipped "freedom fighters" would neither have the ability nor the wherewithal to seize land and defend it. Moreover, while the army had initially denied the involvement of its troops in the intrusion, two soldiers were awarded the
Nishan-E-Haider (Pakistan's highest military honour). Another 90 soldiers were also given
gallantry awards, most of them
posthumously, confirming Pakistan's role in the episode. India also released
taped phone conversations between the Army Chief and a senior Pakistani general where the latter is recorded saying: "the scruff of [the militants] necks is in our hands",although Pakistan dismissed it as a "total fabrication". Concurrently, Pakistan made several contradicting statements, confirming its role in Kargil, when it defended the incursions saying that the LOC itself was disputed.
[91] Pakistan also attempted to internationalize the Kashmir issue, by linking the crisis in Kargil to the larger
Kashmir conflict but, such a diplomatic stance found few backers on the world stage.
As the Indian counter-attacks picked up momentum, Pakistani prime minister Nawaz Sharif flew to meet U.S. President Bill Clinton on July 4 to obtain support from the United States. Clinton rebuked Sharif, however, and asked him to use his contacts to rein in the militants and withdraw Pakistani soldiers from Indian territory. Clinton would later reveal in his autobiographythat "Sharif's moves were perplexing" since the Indian Prime Minister had travelled to Lahore to promote bilateral talks aimed at resolving the Kashmir problem and "by crossing the Line of Control, Pakistan had wrecked the [bilateral] talks".[93] On the other hand, he applauded Indian restraint for not crossing the LoC and escalating the conflict into an all-out war.
G8 nations supported India and condemned the Pakistani violation of the LOC at the
Colognesummit. The
European Union also opposed Pakistan's violation of the LOC.
China, a long-time ally of Pakistan, insisted on a pullout of forces to the pre-conflict positions along the LOC and settling border issues peacefully. Other organisations like the
ASEAN Regional Forum too supported India's stand on the inviolability of the LOC.
Faced with growing international pressure, Sharif managed to pull back the remaining soldiers from Indian territory. The joint statement issued by Clinton and Sharif conveyed the need to respect the Line of Control and resume bilateral talks as the best forum to resolve all disputes.
Refer to the part in block letters. Please dont say that Clinton said such things in his biography since India asked him to. That would not be surprising though given the quality of news on your media like Hiw India pays Hollywood to cat their actors and make movies about India. As far as Nehru going to UN is concerned it had two fold strategy. One was to stop the war and I concede that as a proud Indian with nothing to hide since from day 1 our objective has been education and development rather than deriving thrills by trying to realize the sayings of our Holy books. But the real objective was to legitimize our claim on the entire valley. That's the reason why we have the UNSC resolution on Kashmir in the first place cayse bith the countries had overlapping claims over Kashmir. Do you relly think that if we made up our minds to beat your arse in 48 you could have saved your behind?? Do you know Hiw many face off we have with the PLA every year in Arunachal Pradesh, below is a video of How the Indo Tibetan Border Police and not even the IA treat the Chinese PLA, the samebPLA whom u guys look up to as your Messiah?? But not a single bullet is fired by either side. Pakistanis would come up with illogical arguements like
China is mercuful and
they just wanted to teach us a lesson in 62 and then
they had pity and all such downright laughable trash.
Watch 10:00 onwards and look how they are abusing the PLA regulars
Here's another one. The Indians tell the Chinesebthis is not your bloddy area.
Here's a video where the Chinese and the Indian countetparts share a smoke even whike there's a confrontation going on
And even in 62 if guys would have opened a second front the outcome would have been the same as 48, 65 , 71 and 99 pal. Pakistanis were neither Indian nir Chinese even then. Maybe your general knew better and did not even send in a few of those strategic assets aka non state actors. LOL