What's new

India has given in to extremism: COAS

COAS Bajwa is wrong and he should know better than spreading such false information. Instead of deflecting and misdirecting the people of Pakistan into thinking India is somehow drifting into extremism, he should learn to do his job and get the Pakistan military out of government, politics, business and religious proliferation and instead start to defend the country and its people from terrorists. There is a bomb every other week and Pakistani leaders have made it a habit of not accepting their failure in doing their job.
 
.
The difference between Pakistan and India is that Pakistan fights extremists of the majority faith despite having a wider majority of the majority faith than India. India on the other hand has put them as leaders and allowed them to form government. All through Indian votes. So it is a reality that India has given in to right wing extremism. Pakistan on the other had is fighting it with the loss of 80,000 people in the process. Yet we haven't backed down. Bigotry's only answer is a bullet to the head which Pakistan has given. On the other hand Modi and Adithyanath are sitting in government. One the leader of the nation, the other the CM of India's biggest province-which is in many ways oppressing muslims.
 
. .
The difference between Pakistan and India is that Pakistan fights extremists of the majority faith despite having a wider majority of the majority faith than India. India on the other hand has put them as leaders and allowed them to form government. All through Indian votes. So it is a reality that India has given in to right wing extremism. Pakistan on the other had is fighting it with the loss of 80,000 people in the process. Yet we haven't backed down. Bigotry's only answer is a bullet to the head which Pakistan has given. On the other hand Modi and Adithyanath are sitting in government. One the leader of the nation, the other the CM of India's biggest province-which is in many ways oppressing muslims.

i-can-smell-fake-a-mile-away-1fb49.png
 
.
The difference between Pakistan and India is that Pakistan fights extremists of the majority faith despite having a wider majority of the majority faith than India. India on the other hand has put them as leaders and allowed them to form government. All through Indian votes. So it is a reality that India has given in to right wing extremism. Pakistan on the other had is fighting it with the loss of 80,000 people in the process. Yet we haven't backed down. Bigotry's only answer is a bullet to the head which Pakistan has given. On the other hand Modi and Adithyanath are sitting in government. One the leader of the nation, the other the CM of India's biggest province-which is in many ways oppressing muslims.
True and very well said.
 
.
LOL - no.

In 1999 - first Sartaz Aziz came to India. The meeting lasted about 2 minutes before India kicked him out. India did not go to US. Pakistan rushed to US with its tail between its legs begging USA to save it. As usual. He was not even invited - he just landed up there. LOL - begging.

In 1948 - Nope, India did not claim Kashmir till the Treaty of Accession of signed. According to the Indian Independence Act of the British Parliament, Kashmir was an independent nation which your country invaded unilaterally. Read some history.

1965 - hahahahahha - LOL - Pakistan tried to take Kashmir in 1965 and barely managed to save Lahore despite being a SEATO and CENTO ally with superior weapons. As usual, achieved jack. And lost face.
Why would our PM run to US when we had the peaks? Talk some sense kiddo. As per that accession whole Kashmir would have been under your control, is it? Were you able to liberate the part we've under our belt? NO, have you been able to do it? NO, Will you ever be able to do it? Hell NO. End of the story.
In 1965, your Air force were literally annihilated to that extent that your pilots didn't want to go for any sorties lol. P.A.F scared the hell out of I.A.F. :)
 
.
The whole world knows this but the problem here is our corrupt politicians are not acting against India at all because of which India is sending negative message to the world against Pakistan.
 
.
Why would our PM run to US when we had the peaks? Talk some sense kiddo. As per that accession whole Kashmir would have been under your control, is it? Were you able to liberate the part we've under our belt? NO, have you been able to do it? NO, Will you ever be able to do it? Hell NO. End of the story.
In 1965, your Air force were literally annihilated to that extent that your pilots didn't want to go for any sorties lol. P.A.F scared the hell out of I.A.F. :)
Listen child, your PM ran to US because Indian jets were pounding your positions and one by one you were being thrown out.
LOL - yes, you were within 20 km of Srinagar and we pushed you out of the valley. LOL. What history do they teach in Pak?
Haha - in 1965 - you lost more land. Your ploy to capture Kashmir failed - as usual. India would have walked into Lahore if not for a U.N. mandated ceasefire. Here is Bhutto crying in UN that "mighty" India has attacked a "small" Pakistan - LOL -
 
.
Listen child, your PM ran to US because Indian jets were pounding your positions and one by one you were being thrown out.
LOL - yes, you were within 20 km of Srinagar and we pushed you out of the valley. LOL. What history do they teach in Pak?
Haha - in 1965 - you lost more land. Your ploy to capture Kashmir failed - as usual. India would have walked into Lahore if not for a U.N. mandated ceasefire. Here is Bhutto crying in UN that "mighty" India has attacked a "small" Pakistan - LOL -
Hahahahaha our PM ran to Clinton because he had said our Army isn't involved. The jihadists are behind it. Even then, our PM was dumb and went there to accept what he had rejected initially? What are you smoking these days? Your army and PM got chickened out. We were pounding your army then resulted in brutal casualties. It's not worth talking to you as you're a teenager talking out of his *** lol...
 
.
Even the coas of pakistani army is very good at comedy, umer shariff was right.
 
.
Hahahahaha our PM ran to Clinton because he had said our Army isn't involved. The jihadists are behind it. Even then, our PM was dumb and went there to accept what he had rejected initially? What are you smoking these days? Your army and PM got chickened out. We were pounding your army then resulted in brutal casualties. It's not worth talking to you as you're a teenager talking out of his *** lol...
LOL - read up. And don't read up material issued by some madrassa. Who told you to go there? Begging for the Americans to bail you out? Of course, you said your Army wasn't involved - cowards tend to do that. Snuck up on empty posts and when started getting slapped around - haha - ran to American like a cry baby. LOL.
 
.
Listen child, your PM ran to US because Indian jets were pounding your positions and one by one you were being thrown out.
LOL - yes, you were within 20 km of Srinagar and we pushed you out of the valley. LOL. What history do they teach in Pak?
Haha - in 1965 - you lost more land. Your ploy to capture Kashmir failed - as usual. India would have walked into Lahore if not for a U.N. mandated ceasefire. Here is Bhutto crying in UN that "mighty" India has attacked a "small" Pakistan - LOL -

God he was such a poor speaker!!!!! Who wrote his speeches?
 
.
LOL - read up. And don't read up material issued by some madrassa. Who told you to go there? Begging for the Americans to bail you out? Of course, you said your Army wasn't involved - cowards tend to do that. Snuck up on empty posts and when started getting slapped around - haha - ran to American like a cry baby. LOL.
Dumb, goofy chap, you couldn't even read what I had written. You're chickened out like your army. Nawaz Sharif had told internationally that its not Army but the Jihadists who have beaten the shit out of Indian weak pu$$ies and kicked them out of the peaks/posts.
Your pu$$y army worked it's a$$ out to get the peaks/posts back but couldn't. Then the weak pu$$y Indians (India's PM) ran to US and said, dear papa, Pakistani soldiers have got us with our pants down. They're drilling our holes till our throats. Please help us. Then Clinton pressurized Nawaz Sharif and he went there and guaranteed Clinton the retreat of Pakistan Army. Straight up in your 2, if you know what I mean hahahahaha
Until then, your army was only pounding their own a$$es courtesy of Pakistan's Army. You dead ones were lying there for weeks and weeks but pu$$y Indian soldiers didn't come to pick their dead ones even when Pakistan Army guaranteed they won't fire at them. This is the reality, what I read doesn't come from Madrassa but is based on genuine facts. What you read came out of Indians anus lol..

God he was such a poor speaker!!!!! Who wrote his speeches?
I'll give that to you. He was not only a poor speaker but a power hungry a$$. This is the reason why he had gotten his a$$ handed over to Zia. He was directly responsible for the fall of Bangladesh.
 
.
God he was such a poor speaker!!!!! Who wrote his speeches?
He was decent in 1971 - did a full drama of tearing his papers and walking off like a cry baby in the UN Session.

Dumb, goofy chap, you couldn't even read what I had written. You're chickened out like your army. Nawaz Sharif had told internationally that its not Army but the Jihadists who have beaten the shit out of Indian weak pu$$ies and kicked them out of the peaks/posts.
Your pu$$y army worked it's a$$ out to get the peaks/posts back but couldn't. Then the weak pu$$y Indians (India's PM) ran to US and said, dear papa, Pakistani soldiers have got us with our pants down. They're drilling our holes till our throats. Please help us. Then Clinton pressurized Nawaz Sharif and he went there and guaranteed Clinton the retreat of Pakistan Army. Straight up in your 2, if you know what I mean hahahahaha
Until then, your army was only pounding their own a$$es courtesy of Pakistan's Army. You dead ones were lying there for weeks and weeks but pu$$y Indian soldiers didn't come to pick their dead ones even when Pakistan Army guaranteed they won't fire at them. This is the reality, what I read doesn't come from Madrassa but is based on genuine facts. What you read came out of Indians anus lol..


I'll give that to you. He was not only a poor speaker but a power hungry a$$. This is the reason why he had gotten his a$$ handed over to Zia. He was directly responsible for the fall of Bangladesh.
LOL - a madrassa educated person's grasp of "facts". Hahahahaha

1. Pak had requested meeting with India - and India terminated that meeting in precisely 2 minutes.

2. Pakistan went to US. US asked India to come to the meeting and India refused. LOL - Nawaz called up and went uninvited. Apparently with his full family in case he has to ask for refuse.

3. We all know which country did not claim its soldiers. http://www.nytimes.com/1999/07/17/world/india-buries-soldiers-that-pakistan-won-t-claim.html?mcubz=0

LOL, now child, show all these to your teacher in the madrassa and ask him to stop teaching wrong things.
 
.
LOL - read up. And don't read up material issued by some madrassa. Who told you to go there? Begging for the Americans to bail you out? Of course, you said your Army wasn't involved - cowards tend to do that. Snuck up on empty posts and when started getting slapped around - haha - ran to American like a cry baby. LOL.
Americans warned both countries by deploying aircraft carriers to the region. If it were in their respective favours, these two beggar countries with their enormous militaries would have gladly finished each other. I fear for the day when India and Pakistan overcome their differences on petty disputes, as that level of common sense is in a very narrow corridor these days. Both sides have suffered, one may have more than the other on certain issues, yet they will keep on going with animosity towards one another. Not the peoples, but the select politicians who benefit financially with power out of all this hate.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom