What's new

India expels American diplomat

Atleast you agree that america went overboard and acted silly...

The only thing that was handled badly was strip and cavity searching her, there is little doubt she broke American laws. The only question was whether or not she had immunity. IMO the marshal's should have waited for the state department to clear things with the Indian side before booking her because once that got out (the searches) all you Indians went psycho and your government started going overboard.
 
Not denying that America is at fault, but the fault is a minor one involving protocol, they could have handled it better......but us indians are at greater faults, refusing to acknowledge that this bloody women has commited pejury, the fcking indian elite and the blind common patriotic fool jumped to her defence.You know what irks me, india never took such a tough stance when many of our citizens are languishing in jail in foreign government for bogey piracy charges, when some are captive in somalia jails ,kidnapped by pirates.....but all fcking hell gets loose when a bloody corrupt ethically challenged women faces a bloody prospect of a trial.Fcking hypocrite government.
Then americans should have dealt the case with indian govt...
Not by taking some of our citizens to america without informing india...
Its all because of that Preet bakoda want to project himself as patritic american just like @JayAtl

White man's burden changed to brown man's. We need to educate and uplift him. It is our moral duty :D
Yes their education is not as per standards...

The only thing that was handled badly was strip and cavity searching her, there is little doubt she broke American laws. The only question was whether or not she had immunity. IMO the marshal's should have waited for the state department to clear things with the Indian side before booking her because once that got out (the searches) all you Indians went psycho and your government started going overboard.
Even all this fuzz from indians is about cavity search and the reckless response from america that cavity search is common...
 
i am...
So what...

To answer your question, it doesn't matter whether you are an Indian citizen if anyone is in America they are subject to American laws unless they have diplomatic immunity (which was the whole dispute here).

Secondly she only got searched the way she did because she was booked by the federal Marshals and not by the local NYPD, had it been the local PD the booking process might not have been as "high-handed" as it was. The Marshals however were doing their job the way it is supposed to be done even though like I mentioned they should have waited the minute she started screaming about immunity and gotten in contact with the state department. That being said it is not their job to sort out who has immunity or not as their job is simply to arrest and book followed by which the District attorney chooses whether to take things to trial or not.
 
This is normal , they declare one of ours and we one of theirs "personal non grata" its an understanding between the govts.
used to be common during the cold war.
 
Tit for tat.

The Indian brilliant next step is to buy a set of plane tickets for an American maid and her family to fly to India, give them immigrant status.
This is probably the most monumental task yet to find an American family willing to live in India.
 
Did anybody ask UN? How can India claim she is with UN without any proof? There was no special acknowledgement required from US state dept (in the form of ID) as posting was temporary.

India did push her status to UN mission later and UN did say they could grant it if US state dept. agreed. And the US state dept, which has apologized for the " changing into jail uniform, what is erroneously being termed as a strip ' search'., was excessive and did grant her UN mission immunity. But did not apologize( rightfully) for for the ' crime she was indicted for'.
 
Bs we did not waive anything. we were claiming dip immunity on a CIA ' contractor'. That was the biggest hoodwink we did on pakistan to our advantage.

and you keep arguing with this @dontsuspendme troll. he is not an indian citizen. he is residing in india but from ' another country', and has created this new ID here to attack all those countries his motherland opposes and those he sees India having good relationship with. as evident when he attacks americans, israel others and always is pro china here. a paid 50 center playing others for fools.
lol...butthurt you american...
Chinese are better than you converted americans...
Preet bakoda is an example...
 
Blood money was paid for Davis to get out. By our acceptance of this it appears we waived his immunity.

That is typical US hypocrisy ...moron Obama proclaimed that there is wider principle to follow ....

First US department tried to accord diplomat status to this hired mercenary ....2 days after he was charged with murder ...

US all along maintained that Pakistan has no jurisdiction over Raymond davis ....when Pakistani court did not relent ( US used the very law it abhors at the very court which it maintained has no jurisdiction over Raymond Davis ....) So much for the love of the law , justice and human rights that US pretends to practice

US made volte face ....and suddenly used 'crutches' of Diyyat - blood money to get Raymond davis ...out of clutches of Pakistani law ....

Despite all ' behind the scene' - arm twisting that happened to Pakistan to swallow the blood money option ....You have audacity to say that US waived off Raymond davis immunity ...???? Waived off Diplomatic immunity -which he did not have in first place ??? ....This assertion of yours matches with 'Hypocrite of first order ' title of yours !!!
 
Tit for tat.

The Indian brilliant next step is to buy a set of plane tickets for an American maid and her family to fly to India, give them immigrant status.
This is probably the most monumental task yet to find an American family willing to live in India.

lo behold the chinese IQ...gada
 
Did anybody ask UN? How can India claim she is with UN without any proof? There was no special acknowledgement required from US state dept (in the form of ID) as posting was temporary.
State Dept. conference, Dec 19th: link
 
To answer your question, it doesn't matter whether you are an Indian citizen if anyone is in America they are subject to American laws unless they have diplomatic immunity (which was the whole dispute here).

Secondly she only got searched the way she did because she was booked by the federal Marshals and not by the local NYPD, had it been the local PD the booking process might not have been as "high-handed" as it was. The Marshals however were doing their job the way it is supposed to be done even though like I mentioned they should have waited the minute she started screaming about immunity and gotten in contact with the state department. That being said it is not their job to sort out who has immunity or not as their job is simply to arrest and book followed by which the District attorney chooses whether to take things to trial or not.
Who cares whether it is police or marshalls...
End of the day they are americans...A mistake is a mistake and deserves apology...
 
Even all this fuzz from indians is about cavity search and the reckless response from america that cavity search is common...

Which it is if Marshals are arresting you, people forget it was US Marshals who brought her in and not local PD.
 
Back
Top Bottom