'India could revert to pre-1947 state'

[MirBadshah]

Some delusioned thick head morons do not want to come out of the the dreamland of superpower, their eyes are closed and brains not functioning, what they see is taking over the world, while they ignore million who die of hunger, diseases, riots and kill each other like animals.

Even, if someone from themselves want to show them the real picture what is their future, they dont want to believe, almost every falling regime in world uses this kind of delusion and psudo nationalism as a last resort.

Who gives a rats **** to these morons who are in dreamland, might be they are some times ashamed when they face the reality and then wait for it come and take them........................what a delusion!

 

[Awesome]

No, I think in 12 years. Kashmir would breakaway and Join Pakistan. Kerala would become Mallu Land. Tamil would unite with Sri-lanka, In the India would be divided into 14 different pieces

Lol....

Mallu Land aka Malbaristan (a joke echoed here in Dubai). No offence, honestly.

India can have some further fragmentation... But it would require some massive catalysts. It's no where near the brink of fragmentation or something as this article makes it seem.

 

[BanglaBhoot]

The disintegration of Indian had actually begun with the creation of Bangladesh with the seeds being planted in 1971. This was a point astutely made by Henry Kissinger and confirmed by other writers -

"The inevitable emergence of Bangladesh - which we postulated – presented India with fierce long-term problems. For Bangladesh was in effect East Bengal. Separated only by religion from India’s most fractious and most separatist state, West Bengal. They shared language, tradition, culture, and above all, a volatile national character. Whether, it turned nationalistic or radical, Bangladesh would overtime accentuate India’s centrifugal tendencies. It might be a precedent for the creation of other Moslem states, carved this time out of India. Once it was independent, its Moslem heritage might eventually lead to a rapprochement with Pakistan. All of this dictated to the unsentimental planners in New Delhi that its birth had to be accompanied by a dramatic demonstration of Indian predominance on the sub-continent … Mrs. Gandhi was going to war not because she was convinced of our failure but because she feared our success [in negotiations]"

Henry Kissinger – ‘The White House Years’ (1979) pg. 881-915

This statement, however, only considers the issue from the perspective of West Bengal but ignored completely the Seven Sister States who had less reason to be within the Indian Union. While Adux may be right about the economic arguments wealth did not prevent the collapse of the Roman Empire and the emergence of internal dissenters like Spartacus which merely reflects the wide disparities in that society and which is aggravated one hundred fold in today’s India.

 

[Dravidan]

Lol....

Mallu Land aka Malbaristan (a joke echoed here in Dubai). No offence, honestly.

India can have some further fragmentation... But it would require some massive catalysts. It's no where near the brink of fragmentation or something as this article makes it seem.

Why u bring this "stan" to us.. we dont want to name it "malabaristan" after all this"stan" is not our language. its yours..
Dude for every "catalysts" we have an "Anticatalyst" so dont worry abt that

I dont know y these people hates India and Indias this much. Is that you "Haters" who is deciding our future.. It seems that these Pakistanis and Bangladehis knows India better than we Indians do. We Indians know how to manage our country. We have a strong foundation which was laid thousands of years ago. We are just not a 60yr old country which is made on the basis of religion like you "mourners". With Gods grace all those "nuts" left India in 1947.
We are Indians first then only we are tamils, malayalee, kannada,bihari,punjabi,oriya,bengali,assames... etc. Dont teach us about unity.
I think its a waste of time giving a lecture on Indian patriotism to u people there. If ur getting satisfaction on saying or hearing abt disintergation of India.. keep on dreaming and talking abt it.. Im ready to entertain u all on this...

 

[EagleEyes]

Oh so much pain. It hurts. Dont it?

You same people divided our country in half.

You same people now want to divide Balochistan.

Now when we want to divide. It hurts!

 

[Dravidan]

Oh so much pain. It hurts. Dont it?

You same people divided our country in half.

You same people now want to divide Balochistan.

Now when we want to divide. It hurts!

Who started the game first ?
Until u people stops creating prob in kashmir we will create prob for u in Balochistan
We are not "so soft" to show our left cheek if someone hits our right cheek
Tit for tat is must.
Yes we divided you into two..and will keep on trying for another if u havent learned a lesson yet.
you are trying for decades to divide us by all means.. but who is winning here..
It only took 20yrs for us to divide u into two...

 

[EagleEyes]

How old are you again?

 

[Interceptor]

Who started the game first ?
Until u people stops creating prob in kashmir we will create prob for u in Balochistan
We are not "so soft" to show our left cheek if someone hits our right cheek
Tit for tat is must.
Yes we divided you into two..and will keep on trying for another if u havent learned a lesson yet.
you are trying for decades to divide us by all means.. but who is winning here..
It only took 20yrs for us to divide u into two...

What a sad fate lies for people like you. People that live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

 

[Keysersoze]

Who started the game first ?
Until u people stops creating prob in kashmir we will create prob for u in Balochistan
We are not "so soft" to show our left cheek if someone hits our right cheek
Tit for tat is must.
Yes we divided you into two..and will keep on trying for another if u havent learned a lesson yet.
you are trying for decades to divide us by all means.. but who is winning here..
It only took 20yrs for us to divide u into two...

Hate to burst your bubble but if you were as good at causing trouble as you like to think do you think Nato might drop you line and tell you to butt out?

And somehow I have very little worries about the whole Balochi situation. So far I would suggest despite your best efforts you haven't really done bugger all. Keep up with oneism though. make sure you clean up after yourself.

This thread was being dealt with by the Indian members with a sense of humour however you seem to be out to "prove" how smart you are...good luck with that.......

 

[EagleEyes]

Who started the game first ?
Until u people stops creating prob in kashmir we will create prob for u in Balochistan
We are not "so soft" to show our left cheek if someone hits our right cheek
Tit for tat is must.
Yes we divided you into two..and will keep on trying for another if u havent learned a lesson yet.
you are trying for decades to divide us by all means.. but who is winning here..
It only took 20yrs for us to divide u into two...

Not interested in a debate but a few clarifications to the unknowns.

India started to supply weapons and training to the rebellious groups in Bangladesh, and in some cases soldiers were sent without the uniforms fully armed to fight with the rebellious group before PAF started the preemptive strike against the IAF bases. It is known that naval ships from the west were not able to go to the east due to the geographical location and bully of the Indian Navy, and soon the war was declared.

Benazir Buhtoo has already issued statements about Musharraf mastering the independence of Kashmir and defeating much larger Indian Army in Indian Occupied Kashmir but due to international relations the plan was dropped even though India planned the full scale affiliation in the east in 1971.

 

[joey]

No one is interested in dividing Pakistan, I still believe there should be reconcilation between the two and Kashmirs LOC should be accepted as IB, there are world powers who dont any peace in the region, and sometimes before we just played the game by the playee.

Presently both countries are severely downclocked in everything on what it could have achieved.

 

[Bushroda]

No one is interested in dividing Pakistan, I still believe there should be reconcilation between the two and Kashmirs LOC should be accepted as IB, there are world powers who dont any peace in the region, and sometimes before we just played the game by the playee.

Presently both countries are severely downclocked in everything on what it could have achieved.

Getting LoC to be accepted as IB would take atleast 2 generations of time even if all the parties come to a secret agreement as on today. There is no shortage of hawks on either side. Any Indian government who decides to bite the bullet could end up warming opposition benches for next 2 decades. And Pakistani end could see General Musharaff hanging by the Rawalpindi lamppost. Although, I feel this is the most feasible solution. But, how much are Indians & Pakistanis prepared to accept it?

 

[joey]

IIRC, LOC being a IB can be DEFINITELY realised by India, We dont want any kind of further "aggression" to The part they had on 47/48.

 

[Bushroda]

Intellectuals in Indian side are of this opinion. OK!!! GoI supports it. But is it willing to bite the bullet. Suppose there is a breakthrough in talks tomorrow & all three parties agree on this principle then how do you suppose Indian government is going to tell its people when all this time they've constantly fed them that Azad Kashmir/Azad Kashmir belongs to India & Pakistan has illegally occupied it. There would be a large section of population that would welcome it. Another section that would digress it. And between them are left the borderliners who can be easily influenced into believing that the whole solution was a selloff given the nature of politics in India.

My personal opinion is that We've banged our heads enough over this issue. Lets make LoC as IB, getting some sort of arrangement for Kasmiris(on the lines of Cyprus) and get on with our respective lives hoping not to cross eachothers path. We surely need a break from eachother for sometime before we approach for any sort of new alignment.

 

[MirBadshah]

One the group of seven states rises, the borders would be different........come on great seven, a long way to go, every one would get justice.