Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Still far less than PLAAF or PAF fughter jet crash rates.Fine, assume I cna open that link, but how does that compare to 10 planes lost per year and 75 died in IAF? . And where is the Janes report on 9 J-10 crashes?
Dude.Lol India feed your drones some Horlick or Bonvita.
Source? Indian ones don't count.Dude.
There have been six drone crashes in Pakistan since January 2016.
You really need to feed them vitamin tablets.
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Database/Accidents/listing.phpStill far less than PLAAF or PAF fughter jet crash rates.
Aviation safety which is run by Jane's Editor Gerard has already reported 9;J-10 crashes:
httpswww,aviation-safety,net/wikibase/dblist.php?AcType=J10
httpswww,aviation-safety,net/wikibase/dblist.php?Country=apSource? Indian ones don't count.
WTF is this link bro?httpswww,aviation-safety,net/wikibase/dblist.php?Country=ap
httpswww,aviation-safety,net/wikibase/dblist.php?Country=ap
This guy is sick, keep on posting links in commas and without the ://WTF is this link bro?
pretty low crash rate.BHARAT RAKSHAK lists 118 ACCIDENTS in 8 years from 2007-2015, not including 2016-2017.
Btw, Aviation safety can be edited by anyone including ME and they don't warrant the accuracy, it's like Wikipedia. Try searching for SU-30MKI crash rates there and see if you can find any.
If you don’t know how to win then pls don’t insult your IQ.
I cannot post links normally as I need Atleast 39 posts.WTF is this link bro?
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Database/Accidents/listing.php
BHARAT RAKSHAK lists 118 ACCIDENTS in 8 years from 2007-2015, not including 2016-2017.
Btw, Aviation safety can be edited by anyone including ME and they don't warrant the accuracy, it's like Wikipedia. Try searching for SU-30MKI crash rates there and see if you can find any.
http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/IAF/Database/Accidents/listing.php
BHARAT RAKSHAK lists 118 ACCIDENTS in 8 years from 2007-2015, not including 2016-2017.
Btw, Aviation safety can be edited by anyone including ME and they don't warrant the accuracy, it's like Wikipedia. Try searching for SU-30MKI crash rates there and see if you can find any.
I cannot post links normally as I need Atleast 39 posts.
So you just have to replace the commas with dots to visit the website's.
118 crashes in 8 years and that's low? Sure, check that link, there are no SU-30MKI crashes recorded genius.pretty low crash rate.
Good to see drastic reduction in crashes post 2011.
Anyone cannot edit Aviation safety as they wish as each and very minor edit has to be approved by Harro or Gerard personally.
No edits without sources are allowed.
BTW only 8 Su-30 crashed compared to 9 J-10s.
This information is added by users of ASN. Neither ASN nor the Flight Safety Foundation are responsible for the completeness or correctness of this information.
That just a legal point.118 crashes in 8 years and that's low? Sure, check that link, there are no SU-30MKI crashes recorded genius.
why are you comparing only SU-30MKI crashes to J-10? Why not the whole air force? Even in 20 years, China cannot reach 118 crashes and 75 killed.
This sums it all. . NO SU-30MKI found in that site at all....suspicious!
Legal or not legal, they already inform you they are not be responsible for the accuracy. So your whole argument revolves around a person named Harro?That just a legal point.
No edit even minor can be approved without Harro permission.
All eight Su-30 crashes have been recorded:
httpswww,aviation-safety,net/wikibase/dblist.php?AcType=SU27
The fact is since 2012 our fighter jet crash rate is lower than PAFs
So my edit depends on a person named Harro? That's your official source?So why don’t you edit that peice of junk and see to it that it survives the day?
Come on you can do it !!
Do it Pakistanis are good at it.
Leave it to me.
This information is added by users of ASN. Neither ASN nor the Flight Safety Foundation are responsible for the completeness or correctness of this information.