Kuru
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2017
- Messages
- 2,880
- Reaction score
- -18
- Country
- Location
Sorry if I didnt mention it but what I had written wasnt based on the OP. Or I wasnt trying to summarize the OP.Not agreeing or disagreeing with OP, but it seems like you have serious comprehension issues.
I merely stated what Pakistan has done I.e. support Taliban, then support the US and then support the Taliban again.
Since the article blames India for terrorism that finds no takers in the world, I simply reject it. And for this very reason, I also reject the explanation that ''Pakistan's interest changed from supporting the US to showing indifference to US' interests because India was doing terrorism from Afghanistan.''The gist of OP is that because India used Afghan territory to support terrorism in Pakistan, Pakistan's interests changed from supporting US to at the very least showing indifference to US interests.
Now, if you think about it, the article is trying to imply that Pakistan played double game (because of whatever reasons) that caused Taliban take over.
In other words, it wasnt India.