What's new

"India cannot fight two-front war, Its impossible" - Pravin Sawhney

.
Just ask yourself this question do we have to be below countries to beat you

- USA (a country beaten by rag tags) and beaten by Viets,
- Russia same beaten by rag tags and the help of benevolent ISI and PA with money of arabs and stingers from USA.
- Britain almost beaten by germans if there was USA in WW2 , then queen which never dies would have been dead long ago.
- France , the less you say the better, and yes i surrender

I see you are high on cow dung fumes , go hug modi

whom you are comparing with Americans, Russians, Brits or French with?

and then one more thing, you guys want our medicine, our movies, our products and then still want to sling mud at us? we don't want to stop medicines supply to you.... but if we do then who will save you? besharam pakistani....
 
. .
You stupid piss drinker go hug shiv lungam.
Shove your medicines and your shist movies up your azz only dumb focks watch endian movie We have enough medicines of our own and there is always China to provide unavailable medicine.

Stupid dot head pajeet

many of your patients, specially cancer patients are alive because of medicines from India... such people who has no self respect will take medicines and then spit on the savior.

see demeaning others religion is not my teaching, i was bought up by good parents.... and i see the problem in you and your upbringing.
if i start giving such words freely you may not have any place to hide.
 
. .
India can fight two front wars with China and Pakistan just like a ho having threesome with BBCs.

this is not pakistans war, chill and sit tight. why you want to bring the war to your home? let people live.....
 
.
2 Years of biitch slapping by both of your enemies. My oh my what the world must be thinking right now.

Here is fighting agenda for last year and coming years

2019 - Pakistan
2020 - China
2021 - Nepal / Sri Lanka / Bangladesh(May be , possibly never going to happen you need spine which BD lack) May the best one wins
2022 - Super duper fighting bonanza , winner takes all or can share with other allies , holding hands marching towards bright future.
2023 - And they lived happily ever after.

My 0.0000002 cents....
a) India is not fighting Nepal. Nepal has it's own interests. Nepal saw a chance to claim some additional land, and they used that oppurtunity. No body is anyone's brother.
b) 20+ million bangladeshis have crossed over to India. They are having children, and most have voting rights [vote bank politics]. In future, this is going to have big (negative) consequences for India. Indian liberals etc will never let those people be pushed back.
c) China has just pushed India into US + Japan's arms.
d) I agree India is not in a good shape. But countries that go down fighting will eventually get back. But the question is - India , having so many communists + socialists + liberals, has the will the fight?? Remember indian-communists + socialists + liberals do not believe in concept of nation. They are so anti-national.
e) If India splits and gets balkanized (as most Pak posters would like), it will not be good to Pak too. The day of India splitting will be start of end of Pak as well [please note that Pak is not as united as it appears. They have many differences among themselves].
f) India does not have the military power to defeat China. India's strategy is to give bloody nose / defend against China.
g) Courtesy Nehru - India has created huge (in relative indian context) defence PSU behemoths that are so inefficient.
h) Gandhi + Nehru are the original culprits. India will suffer / suffering due to their policies. Those policies can not be undone.
i) For Indians, it took 50+ years to get over 1962 war. The current antics of chinese has forever changed relationship with China.
j) Only time will tell the effects of the current actions by China.
 
Last edited:
.
My 0.0000002 cents....
a) India is not fighting Nepal. Nepal has it's own interests. Nepal saw a chance to claim some additional land, and they used that oppurtunity. No body is anyone's brother.
b) 20+ million bangladeshis have crossed over to India. They are having children, and most have voting rights [vote bank politics]. In future, this is going to have big (negative) consequences for India. Indian liberals etc will never let those people be pushed back.
c) China has just pushed India into US + Japan's arms.
d) I agree India is not in a good shape. But countries that go down fighting will eventually get back. But the question is - India , having so many communists + socialists + liberals, has the will the fight?? Remember indian-communists + socialists + liberals do not believe in concept of nation. They are so anti-national.
e) If India splits and gets balkanized (as most Pak posters would like), it will not be good to Pak too. The day of India splitting will be start of end of Pak as well [please note that Pak is not as united as it appears. They have many differences among themselves].
f) India does not have the military power to defeat China. India's strategy is to give bloody nose / defend against China.
g) Courtesy Nehru - India has created huge (in relative indian context) defence PSU behemoths that are so inefficient.
h) Gandhi + Nehru are the original culprits. India will suffer / suffering due to their policies. Those policies can not be undone.
i) For Indians, it took 50+ years to get over 1962 war. The current antics of chinese has forever changed relationship with China.
j) Only time will tell the effects of the current actions by China.
Fattu Sanghi Logic 101.
 
. . .
Stop the personal abuse, thank you.
hi waz, i dont favor this at all... the way this guy unnecessary demeaning Hindusm ... he is a besharam pakistani for me. in all my replies i never said anything against his religion because that's not what i do.
 
.
Dear pajeet you are like a sticky gum on sidewalk. Go away man before I add you to my friend list
as i said im too good for you, and always a better man than you. there are plenty of cockroaches like you in the world, a mountain hardly cares about what a low life like you says anything....
that always bring me to your parents and their teaching to you.... did they taught you to demean others religion like this?
did they made you the besharam **** that you are right now?
 
.
German were and still are a great 'race.

Yes, among many other races.

The equipment was better than the allies.

Some cases yes, some cases no.

If the might of usa never got involved Europe would still be under Nazi rule.

The US entered late 1941, the tide on the Eastern front turned from mid 1942, the US couldn't do much to turn the tide in a 6 months or so. The US forces actually started fighting the Germans in North Africa on 11 May 1942, with the operations in North Africa. Material help yes, that happened before, from mid-December 1940, with Roosevelt beginning to supply Great Britain. However the Battle of Britain was won in Oct 1940 before any help in terms of material had arrived, this also began the era of RAF superiority over the German luftwaffe.
So no, the Nazis would have lost eventually, it's just their demise was far quicker with US help.


Your right India is not Germany.
But Pakistani and Chinese are not USA Russia and Britain France combined.

Aye, agreed.


Chinese have no war experience and Pakistan is on it's knees economically and still just a developing country of modest means financially technically and industrially. It's hardly a good comparison

China fought in the Second World War, the Korean War, war against India and the war against Vietnam. China also wields massive economic and military superiority over India.
Pakistan is not on its knees, but yes it is modest v India.
 
.
he US entered late 1941, the tide on the Eastern front turned from mid 1942, the US couldn't do much to turn the tide in a 6 months or so. The US forces actually started fighting the Germans in North Africa on 11 May 1942, with the operations in North Africa. Material help yes, that happened before, from mid-December 1940, with Roosevelt beginning to supply Great Britain. However the Battle of Britain was won in Oct 1940 before any help in terms of material had arrived, this also began the era of RAF superiority over the German luftwaffe.
So no, the Nazis would have lost eventually, it's just their demise was far quicker with US help.


The battle of Britain only gave RAF supremacy over Britain and prevented OVERLORD ie invasion of Britian by Germany.

The CARDINAL SIN for HITLER was invading RUSSIA 4 million germans stormed RUSSIA and in 1943 were in 5 foot of snow artic conditions

USA brought huge industrial might machines that produced more tanks planes ammo and equipment then Germany UK Russia Japan combined

IT BECAME A ,MISMTCH.

MAKE no mistake without USA Europe would look very different today
 
.
Please don't compare Modi with Hitler and Indians with Germans. I do not justify any Nazi crimes against humanity but seriously they were a complete different class than these cheapster third copy of Nazis. Never I've heard Wehrmacht giving medals to a soldier who was beaten like a drum by enemy. Indeed they captured entire Europe and almost half of Russia simultaneously and when the defeat was certain, he did suicide like a khuddaar person instead of blabbering false & imaginary victories.

You lost the point. The assertion that you can fight a two front war is fundamentally flawed, that's why I gave the comparison i.e. it stands the test of time.

The battle of Britain only gave RAF supremacy over Britain and prevented OVERLORD ie invasion of Britian by Germany.

The CARDINAL SIN for HITLER was invading RUSSIA 4 million germans stormed RUSSIA and in 1943 were in 5 foot of snow artic conditions

USA brought huge industrial might machines that produced more tanks planes ammo and equipment then Germany UK Russia Japan combined

IT BECAME A ,MISMTCH.

MAKE no mistake without USA Europe would look very different today

Nope, it also provided the springboard for the bombing raids into the heart of industrial Germany. These were taking place before operation Overlord.

bomber1-399883.jpg


Above is the old girl which devastated Germany's industrial heartland.


Agree about Russia.
Of course the US bought help, however to say the war would not have been won without them is wrong.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom