India can’t solve Sri Lanka’s political issues - BJP team

[Saradiel]

Entity?

Type the word ‘entity’ in google and search the meaning, I can’t help u in everything….

@Sashan [MENTION] sankranti
[/MENTION] your comments on this.

Why can’t build an argument alone? Is he a specialist in genetics and DNA lineage..?

You mean Tamils and Sinhalese are from same roots in Sri Lanka. Where is your sources to back such a theory?

Sinhalese and Tamils are basically the same people with same roots… if u have no understanding about the society in SL I still cant help u start by reading a buk…

U missed this part in my comment

Kshatriya found the Sri Lankan Tamils to have a greater contribution from the Sinhalese of Sri Lanka (55.20% +/- 9.47) while the Sinhalese had the greatest contribution from South Indian Tamils (69.86% +/- 0.61), followed by Bengalis from the Northeast India (25.41% +/- 0.51). With both the Sri Lankan Tamils and Sinhalese in the island sharing a common gene pool of 55%. They are farthest from the indigenous Veddahs

http://sbarrkum.blogspot.com/2012/03/sri-lankan-population-dna-genetics-01.html

You said earlier the Tamils are from Sri Lankan background and now say they are from India. You contradict your self aren't you?

How is it contradicting? Sri Lankans are from India ne idiot….sri Lankan is a subset of larger indian set when it comes to people….

The real contradiction is when u say Sri Lankan nationality should represent Sinhala ethnicity and when again u say sri lanka is a ‘word’ to represent Sinhala, tamil, moor, burgher…

If Tamils are from Sri Lanka where is indigenous DNA in Tamil blood?

It is because the Tamils didn’t mix with the veddhas…and u picked only this from what I pasted and conveniently missed this….

“Kshatriya found the Sri Lankan Tamils to have a greater contribution from the Sinhalese of Sri Lanka (55.20% +/- 9.47) while the Sinhalese had the greatest contribution from South Indian Tamils (69.86% +/- 0.61), followed by Bengalis from the Northeast India (25.41% +/- 0.51). With both the Sri Lankan Tamils and Sinhalese in the island sharing a common gene pool of 55%.”

Do not compare me with you. You're just confusing national identity to nationality.

I will never compare u with me, that is an INSULT to me ne

This is what u said in comment 69,
“No Sri Lankan means a word to represent the whole community of Sri Lanka comprising of Sinhala, Tamil, Moors, Burghers etc. These communities are not intermingled with each other.”To which I said,
“And where did I say otherwise?

The matter is the attempt by sinhala nationalists to hijack sri lankan identity and trying to make sri lanka = sinhala. Just look at what ur saying here, u first said sri lanka’s identity is sinhala buddhist and now say “Sri Lankan means a word to represent the whole community of Sri Lanka comprising of Sinhala, Tamil, Moors, Burghers etc.” Do u see how u’re eating ur own words?”

In Sri lanka , nationality is Sri Lankan ethnicity can be Sinhala, tamil,etc..national identity is the identity of the country that is Sri Lanka’s identity and that identity should reflect the ethnicities living there….Got it, idiot?

It seems nationality, ethnicity are big words for ur small brain.. and talk only abt things that u can understand…
.

Do you see American are the mixer of all ethancities. Every one in America share common traditional, cultural, linguistic, ritualistic, behavioral and religious traits more or less. There are no ethnic group in America considers themselves separate from other Americans. But do you think this is same in Sri Lanka?

It is not me who see Americans as a mixer of ethnicities, but americans……

American gov senses record,

http://www.census.gov/prod/2004pubs/c2kbr-35.pdf

The 12 Most Common Ethnicities In America - Business Insider
American ethnicity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Race and ethnicity in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Yes they share a lot of culture because they have moved on as a single nation without a single ethnicity trying to hijack national identity….got it little brain?

We don’t see that in SL because scum bugs like u want the non-Sinhalese Lankans to adopt ur Sinhala ways………
Also America is NOT a people who speak a single language, 12% speak Spanish and there are facilities provided for them to work in Spanish…

Before u bring a stupid statement as an argument, do some background checking……

Give me a source so you can prove your argument.

No I cant give u a source the same way I cant give u a source that Siripala is a name unique to SL. Between Kathiragamar means Katharagama….now understand how it is found only among Lankan tamils?

Tamil cultural elements in Sinhalese culture hasn't made Sinhala culture to turn out to Tamil culture. In every where this is the normal situation. Even American culture is heavily influanced by British culture. Does that make it British?

Did I say so….I said ur argument on Sinhala is unique holds no water…..The reason lankan people in north became tamil was due to invasions and close proximity to SL. After all how does uniqueness play a part in this?

The real answer is not whether tamils in SL is unique or not, but that tamil is an integral part in SL. SL has a tamil heritage in SL.

That is why Sinahala culture has become a unique culture. Do Tamils in Jaffna, Batticollo or in central SL have such a unique culture?

Look my above answer….

I have already answered your querries in that thread. Go and check and post a rebuttal.

Really? If u succeed in ur rebuttal tell me what is the Religious identity in Japan? If u really refuted me that is an easy question for you ne and a simple question you try to ignore every time….

Where did I say legally? You have clearly shown lack of understanding of this subject again.

Did I say u said legally,…..pay attention kid. I knw comprehension is a bit of a problem area for u……but try!.

This is what I said,
“Australia is a multi cultural country and a very well functioning one with less hassles that is why many Lankans, including sinhalese flock to get inside the country.”
YOU said
“Yeah that's why Australia bar Sri Lankan immigrants from entering. And also that's why they say "If anyone cannot live the Australian way they should go!"

ME – “Where does Australia bar Sri Lankan immigrants? Anyone can enter Australia and become a citizen there provided they use the legal methods. It is the boat people that they bar because they enter ILLEGALLY. Are you really THAT stupid?
You have no idea abt immigration, culture and what a multi-cultural country is. It is not surprising that u DON’T KNOW Aussies consider their country as multi-cultural country as u are NOT aware of the country u were born into. Anyone who immigrate recently have to and will adopt Australian ways. And it still does NOT negate the fact Australia is a multi-cultural society.”

YOU – “Then little boy why can't you agree on this in Sri Lanka. Why can't you accept the Sri Lanka has the same right to ask it's citizen to adopt the Sri Lankan way i.e. The Sinhala Buddhist way?”

ME- “Because my darling baby brother sri lankan way is NOT the sinhala buddhist way…..
And these people migrate to Australia after modern australia was established. Also by saying, “Anyone who immigrate recently have to and will adopt Australian ways.”. I didn’t say the Australian authorities force the immigrants to adopt (by way of laws) Australian ways. That is poor understanding of my comment from ur side. Rather stupid from a guy who were lecturing abt grasping the meaning of a sentence.
When immigrants from even asian countries go n settle in Australia they will adopt Aus way of life in a NATURAL method. The 1st generation wont be much into Aus ways but gradually 2nd and 3rd generations will be adopting australian way in a natural way. That is what I meant. Aus doesn’t force their way of life, it naturally happens. If it is forced upon, u will see a counter action, like in SL.”

And just tell me how ur comment even fits this argument…..

And why are u selecting only sections of my comments when answering? Hard to refute?

What is the natural way? And why didn't Tamils adopted in a such a natural way. (If you do not want to take Jaffna Tamils, take the State Tamils instead.) (I believe that the State Tamils now having 5th or 6th generations in SL)

Tamils needn’t adopt Sinhala way, because Tamil is a part of SL. In Australia’s case that is different…u idiot! The Tamils in estates are now removing their indian tag and increasingly identify as Sri Lankan Tamil. Got it?

And again Sinhala ways is NOT Sri Lankan way…u are making this statement thinking so..

Well even if the way of life is imposed upon immigrants why they take counter action against the people who impose it. They should go back to the place they come other than taking counter actions on locals.

Yeah that is possible on new immigrants, NOT old ones…..do u want the Sinhala people to take Veddha ways of life and go around in loin clothes?

Ouch! Resorting to personal insults and name calling? lool Did I hurt you where it hurts? lool! Sri Lankan and caucasian that's an oxymoron. Yes my Caucasian friend. Slum mentality? Mate, the part of India that I hail from, you caucasian lankans can't even afford to step but oh well. If it helps your fragile nationalistic ego of a rather irrelevant country then go ahead, I wouldn't want to be a party pooper.

There are European origin Lankans, we can’t help u if u failed in social studies at school.

Then again we do have FEW intelligent Indians, I'm afraid the same can't be said about caucasian lankans. Plus not that it bothered me but I doubt that anyone that knows me would call me a dimwit Mr. Caucasian.

Of course we are sure abt the word FEW lookin at this forum…

Lool okay then Mr. Caucasian Lankan. Are you mixed race? If not then, no way in hell you're a caucasian. Btw even if you were caucasian as you claim why should it matter? Lankans and their inferiority complex because of the skin complexion.

Is this what you Caucasian Lankans look like when you catch tan? lool

What is wrong with these girls? If we are the ones having inferiority complex we would have imported white skin girls from abroad. We didn’t. But u know the ones who did ne….

 

[HeinzG]

Why can’t build an argument alone? Is he a specialist in genetics and DNA lineage..?

No he is some one how have some sense of reality.

Sinhalese and Tamils are basically the same people with same roots… if u have no understanding about the society in SL I still cant help u start by reading a buk…

Don't you understand my question? "Do Tamils and Sinhalese are from same roots in Sri Lanka?"

U missed this part in my comment

Kshatriya found the Sri Lankan Tamils to have a greater contribution from the Sinhalese of Sri Lanka (55.20% +/- 9.47) while the Sinhalese had the greatest contribution from South Indian Tamils (69.86% +/- 0.61), followed by Bengalis from the Northeast India (25.41% +/- 0.51). With both the Sri Lankan Tamils and Sinhalese in the island sharing a common gene pool of 55%. They are farthest from the indigenous Veddahs

Black South Asia: Sri Lankan Population DNA Genetics 01

I have no much to say against the quoted sentence but seriously are you quoting from a blog? It is better to use wiki than using a blog.

How is it contradicting? Sri Lankans are from India ne idiot….sri Lankan is a subset of larger indian set when it comes to people….

No point in arguing because you have no sense of history or reality.

It is because the Tamils didn’t mix with the veddhas…

Ok. you said earlier that Tamils are the sons of soil in SL. So where did they come from? Did they just sprouted from the earth?

You mean to say Tamils were even surpass Balangoda man when it comes to existence?

and u picked only this from what I pasted and conveniently missed this….

“Kshatriya found the Sri Lankan Tamils to have a greater contribution from the Sinhalese of Sri Lanka (55.20% +/- 9.47) while the Sinhalese had the greatest contribution from South Indian Tamils (69.86% +/- 0.61), followed by Bengalis from the Northeast India (25.41% +/- 0.51). With both the Sri Lankan Tamils and Sinhalese in the island sharing a common gene pool of 55%.”

I conveniently missing it because I cannot comment on a thing that is lacking credible sources. I have seen the above mentioned sentence first in wiki and it didn't give any info about how the researchers done the research.

But I do agree on the overall picture that this quote portraits. But not specifically on each and every part.

In Sri lanka , nationality is Sri Lankan ethnicity can be Sinhala, tamil,etc..national identity is the identity of the country that is Sri Lanka’s identity and that identity should reflect the ethnicities living there….Got it, idiot?

What identity Sri Lanka has without Sinhala Buddhist identity?

Do tell if you remove Sinhala Buddhist identity from national identity how you describe Sri Lankan national identity?

It is not me who see Americans as a mixer of ethnicities, but americans……


Yes they share a lot of culture because they have moved on as a single nation without a single ethnicity trying to hijack national identity….got it little brain?

Do not get mixed up. Do you know what is American identity is? It is English Caucasian.

No matter who enters in to US they have to adopt to the American identity.

We don’t see that in SL because scum bugs like u want the non-Sinhalese Lankans to adopt ur Sinhala ways………

If the immigrants to Eruope, US or Australia can adapt to the local identity why not Tamils, Moor and other minorities in Sri Lanka adapt to Sinhala Buddhist identity?

Also America is NOT a people who speak a single language, 12% speak Spanish and there are facilities provided for them to work in Spanish…

Before u bring a stupid statement as an argument, do some background checking……

Yeah right. There is a separate solely Spanish speak regions in USA.

No I cant give u a source the same way I cant give u a source that Siripala is a name unique to SL. Between Kathiragamar means Katharagama….now understand how it is found only among Lankan tamils?

Is this how you prove your point? Pathetic. In fact why a Tamil family name derived out from a Sinhala village name?

Did I say so….I said ur argument on Sinhala is unique holds no water…..The reason lankan people in north became tamil was due to invasions and close proximity to SL.

So what is your ground here? Do you believe SL Tamils are true sons of soil? Then why say they do not have Veddha DNA?

After all how does uniqueness play a part in this?

Cultural uniqueness is the key to the past. It reflects the historical bond between the people and the respective region. In the Tamil vs Sinhala context Tamils are not unique lot, they have the same culture as their Tamilnadu brethren and Sinhalese even though having Tamil connections are completely unique to Tamil or any other culture in the world proving the bond between Sinhalese and their native land.

The real answer is not whether tamils in SL is unique or not, but that tamil is an integral part in SL. SL has a tamil heritage in SL.

This is not a answer for demanding a separate country for themselves or power devolution. We Sinhalese were too generous IMO.

Really? If u succeed in ur rebuttal tell me what is the Religious identity in Japan? If u really refuted me that is an easy question for you ne and a simple question you try to ignore every time….

Buddhist/Shintoism.

And just tell me how ur comment even fits this argument…..

And why are u selecting only sections of my comments when answering? Hard to refute?

OK I ask the question more easily.

Why it is right for People to adopt to the Australian way and why not it is right in Sri Lanka for people for adopting in to the Sinhala way?

Tamils needn’t adopt Sinhala way, because Tamil is a part of SL. In Australia’s case that is different…u idiot!

Then why immigrants including Tamils adopt to Australia way? They are part of Australia too.

You tend to believe Tamils are sons of soil which actually is not. Search history if you want to learn.

The Tamils in estates are now removing their indian tag and increasingly identify as Sri Lankan Tamil. Got it?

Who are going to accept them? Jaffna Tamils? huh!

Yeah that is possible on new immigrants, NOT old ones…..do u want the Sinhala people to take Veddha ways of life and go around in loin clothes?

Do you think Sinhalese are from India? Which part of India did the Sinhalese arrived and which part in India do Sinhalese live?