India calls Pakistan ‘Terroristan’ in UN rant. Uses the word "terror" 20 times.

[Sheikh Rauf]

I have no Idea where ISIS and TTP come to this,

Why you forgot to mention Bangladesh, Sri Langa, Myanmar, Iran, and rest of the country

Bin Laden is enough Proof, what Proof need more

Then why not the world say it to Pakistan why india is barking over and over again when no one really give f*** about indian position india is invovle giving support to ISIS to TTP as well as BLA we know indian design and the top Leadershit whos knows as TERRORIST and Butch of gujrat mody. swallow the truth.

 

[farhan_9909]

Muslims in india were left on purpose.

 

[HAIDER]

India has responded angrily to a speech by Pakistan's prime minister to the UN general assembly, with an envoy calling the country "Terroristan".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-41357142

Pedantic and utterly half-witted response by India at UN. She managed to use the word "terror" twenty times in her rant. This is pretty desperate if you ask me. One can assume that the isolation strategy didn't return expected results. Surely a mindless rant on a serious UN platform can turn things around for India.

Pak speech touched on Palestinian rights, Kashmir human rights and Rohingya crisis.
Indian response can only be described as autistic screeching and failed to refute anything in particular.

Classy

Today friends and colleague organized a protest for Kashmir and Rohinga at UN building. But smarty pants Indian made a move and send signal to MQM USA and BLA to organized anti Pak protest in front of UN building.... both MQM and BLA were shouting Pakistan Murdabad slogans . Public were very angry due to MQM and BLA behavior. Anyway it was out standing rally organized at UN by all USA PTI offices and many other human rights organization join in this protest.

 

[Chellam]

So what?

Many Nazi criminals were found in South American countries.

What about Hideki Tojo of Japan.
He committed many war crimes and was found in Japan.

Your point is?


What about the Naxal terrorists in India?

you guys are really can't see the difference between Internal and External, It's not my Problem,

Just linking 3rd country and explaining their problem with other countries may be just will help you to ignore your Problem

 

[Joe Shearer]

It confirms what Pakistan has been saying all along, that India is not willing or capable of diplomacy or even talks.

Forget the talks. A simple mention of Kashmiri rights, which is no secret, has them all fired up. It's rather pathetic that she brings this type of ranting, fit only for the Indian media, to a UN platform. I hope Pakistan stays classy.

More or less correct.

At a national level, it is apparently thought that talking to people who are at the same time actively encouraging terrorist attacks gives the wrong signals to those people; they think that they can get away with it.

They can't.

Time they learnt, or at least were told that they can't.

 

[UnitedPak]

More or less correct.

At a national level, it is apparently thought that talking to people who are at the same time actively encouraging terrorist attacks gives the wrong signals to those people; they think that they can get away with it.

They can't.

Time they learnt, or at least were told that they can't.

For a senior member Joe, I expected better from you.
It would be great if you could spend two minutes of thought to check if your arguments even hold water. From Pakistan's perspective it also takes great patience to talk to a regime that has killed tens of thousands of Kashmiris and uses genocide as a national practice to "reclaim" land for hindus.

"Encouraging terror". I wonder where you stand on the US, Israel, Iran and Saudi policies... These accusations only make yourself look clueless.

 

[padamchen]

For a senior member Joe, I expected better from you.
It would be great if you could spend two minutes of thought to check if your arguments even hold water. From Pakistan's perspective it also takes great patience to talk to a regime that has killed tens of thousands of Kashmiris and uses genocide as a national practice to "reclaim" land for hindus.

"Encouraging terror". I wonder where you stand on the US, Israel, Iran and Saudi policies... These accusations only make yourself look clueless.

Did we say we wanted to talk to you?

Don't talk.

Cheers, Doc

 

[Joe Shearer]

For a senior member Joe, I expected better from you.
It would be great if you could spend two minutes of thought to check if your arguments even hold water. From Pakistan's perspective it also takes great patience to talk to a regime that has killed tens of thousands of Kashmiris and uses genocide as a national practice to "reclaim" land for hindus.

"Encouraging terror". I wonder where you stand on the US, Israel, Iran and Saudi policies... These accusations only make yourself look clueless.

It is quite possible that I am clueless; I take my clues from the ambience around me. If we are to talk about Pakistan's point of view, it has been an uninterrupted effort to reverse the events of the past that have now frozen into permanence, and that in spite of several attempts at using force - unsuccessfully, and under cover of normal behaviour - to alter the situation. You need not talk to us; India does not want a dialogue with an establishment that is committed to violence and to encouraging armed intrusions of trained killers into territory held by it. The tens of thousands of Kashmiris that you mention largely consists of these intruders; please read the statistics and count the number killed either crossing the border, or during armed encounters, in broad daylight and in the full glare of publicity, with our media watching closely all the while.

Where you saw genocide used as a national practice to claim land for Hindus beats me entirely. I oppose the present regime and have made no secret of that opposition, but this kind of vapoury stuff is really forcing me to rethink my position that I am engaged in a rational discourse.

 

[padamchen]

Did we say we wanted to talk to you?

Don't talk.

Cheers, Doc

@waz

@Jungibaaz

There is a personal vendetta being played out here.

Cheers, Doc

 

[UnitedPak]

@waz

@Jungibaaz

There is a personal vendetta being played out here.

Cheers, Doc

I was replying to Joe and you basically just told me to shut up. What were you expecting?

 

[padamchen]

I was replying to Joe and you basically just told me to shut up. What were you expecting?

You have a problem with basic English comprehension?

I was referring to your post about dialog between India and Pakistan.

You need to get a life dude. Nobody is interested in you as a person here behind your silly ID. Least of all me.

Cheers, Doc

 

[UnitedPak]

You have a problem with basic English comprehension?

I was referring to your post about dialog between India and Pakistan.

You need to get a life dude. Nobody is interested in you as a person here behind your silly ID. Least of all me.

Cheers, Doc

As usual you don't have a single coherent argument or thought, so yes, I have major issues comprehending your silly outbursts. Like I have told you earlier, grow up and stop approaching me if you are not interested "in me as a person" (wtf). I was addressing Joe, not you.

 

[padamchen]

As usual you don't have a single coherent argument or thought, so yes, I have major issues comprehending your silly outbursts. Like I have told you earlier, grow up and stop approaching me if you are not interested "in me as a person" (wtf). I was addressing Joe, not you.

Are you telling me a member is not allowed to reply to a post just because it's directed at someone else.

You're more absurd than I had you pegged at.

Cheers, Doc

 

[UnitedPak]

Are you telling me a member is not allowed to reply to a post just because it's directed at someone else.

You're more absurd than I had you pegged at.

Cheers, Doc

You are allowed, and you did. Let me quote your fine response for emphasis: "Did we say we wanted to talk to you? Don't talk. [sic]" - padamchen, circa 2017.

And here I thought you were a stealthy and masterful psy-ops expert along with your "doctors, scientists, IT guys, bankers, businessmen, NGO wheelers and dealers" buddies to "make Pakistanis look bad". I am fairly certain you just make yourself look monumentally absurd when you are at it.

 

[padamchen]

You are allowed, and you did. Let me quote your fine response for emphasis: "Did we say we wanted to talk to you? Don't talk. [sic]" - padamchen, circa 2017.

And here I thought you were a stealthy and masterful psy-ops expert along with your "doctors, scientists, IT guys, bankers, businessmen, NGO wheelers and dealers" buddies to "make Pakistanis look bad". I am fairly certain you just make yourself look monumentally absurd when you are at it.

We = India

You = Pakistan

It's like talking to a kid.

A slow special needs one at that.

Cheers, Doc