What's new

India asks China to cease activities in ***

Because a thread is troll thread when there is no proper name mention. Proper name is Azad Kashmir & indian Occupied Kashmir, choose a pick which one you want to discuss.



Go ahead, who cares. lol:lol:

How can it be Azad Kashmir when it is held by the Chinese ?
 
. .
Nah, nobody is gonna use ICBM. I tell you, China will sacrifice Tibet and Xinjiang but will never attack US mainland as long as the Chinese coastal cities are not attacked. China does not value Tibet and Xinjiang as much as it values its own coastal cities. Its easy to understand if you consider their concentration of troops.

How come China reacted in 62 then?

So USA won't react if Wyoming is attacked, because its least populist?

Nice logic you got there.
 
.
Come on guys, Chinese have already been defeated psychologically. India has won the psychological battle against China as the Chinese have broken down completely.

Even the Chinese Defence Minster Guanglie denied Chinese troops' presence in disputed area in a way as if he is pleading for mercy.

The Hindu : News / International :

PLA_1198341f.jpg


He looks frustrated and defeated.
 
.
You have no right to call it *** and you also have no right to boss us around, it's our territory

Come on guys, Chinese have already been defeated psychologically. India has won the psychological battle against China as the Chinese have broken down completely.

Even the Chinese Defence Minster Guanglie denied Chinese troops' presence in disputed area in a way as if he is pleading for mercy.

The Hindu : News / International :

PLA_1198341f.jpg


He looks frustrated and defeated.

China has nothing to worry from India, bro. Wake up. China is atleast 40 years ahead of you.

How can it be Azad Kashmir when it is held by the Chinese ?

How is it held by the Chinese, do tell? Do you fight China in Kashmir, or Pakistan?
 
.
How come China reacted in 62 then?

So USA won't react if Wyoming is attacked, because its least populist?

Nice logic you got there.

62 was a different case. And also in 62, Indian defeat was not what it is perceived today. Arunachal is still with India for a reason.

If US attacks China, which US will do anyway, China will simply try to defend its territory but won't attack US land in counter attack mode.
 
.
Thats right. However, US marines are already available in Afghanistan.

they can be used if need to attack Pak...but guess, we dont need US to attack Pak...in fact I wont prefer to attack Pak....it is very small fish and that too from our local lake..

we need to catch a big and wild fish!!!
 
.
The Chinese part is Aksai Chin & it is historically theirs:cool:

Atleast know the geography of the place you claim as your own. Aksai Chin was never part of what you called "Azad Kashmir". The part of "Azad Kashmir" you gave China is the Trans-Karakoram Tract.
 
.
they can be used if need to attack Pak...but guess, we dont need US to attack Pak...in fact I wont prefer to attack Pak....it is very small fish and that too from our local lake..

we need to catch a big and wild fish!!!

Seems you have different view of Pakistan than your govt and 90% of your people. Your govt is **** scared of Pakistan, and China is light years ahead of India for you to even compare with them
 
.
You have no right to call it *** and you also have no right to boss us around, it's our territory



China has nothing to worry from India, bro. Wake up. China is atleast 40 years ahead of you.



How is it held by the Chinese, do tell? Do you fight China in Kashmir, or Pakistan?

India scares China for a reason which is like indirectly asking China to return Indian lands and perhaps allow Dalai Lama to rule Tibet.
 
.
And no one is going to war. So rein in your missiles.
 
.
Atleast know the geography of the place you claim as your own. Aksai Chin was never part of what you called "Azad Kashmir". The part of "Azad Kashmir" you gave China is the Trans-Karakoram Tract.

We gave China land, and in turn they gave us a strategic location in Kashmir.
 
.
they can be used if need to attack Pak...but guess, we dont need US to attack Pak...in fact I wont prefer to attack Pak....it is very small fish and that too from our local lake..

we need to catch a big and wild fish!!!

Mouse makes elephants run away..

Leaving Pakistan out of the equation is delusional. Even Today 80% of your military sits at Pakistan's border.. not China.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
How come China reacted in 62 then?

So USA won't react if Wyoming is attacked, because its least populist?

Nice logic you got there.

In 62 China met Nehru, now they will meet Bharat!! ..just wait Narendra Modi is coming, era of Nehru is almost gone!!!
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom