Welcome, aboard!
Yesterday you posted a very compelling analysis of the situation in IoJK and about PakKashmiris.
You are the first non-Pak, Western poster to have accurately defined the DialectFramework to not only understand but solve the tragedy of PakKashmiris... and you were/are correct IoJK and Palestine are two different things.
Would be nice to read how you build on your thesis of the EvilEmpire in SouthAsia..i.e. Union of GanguDaesh.
British wanted some sort of balance of power against China which was under LongMarch back then...
Anyhow, keep posting your quality stuff... great to read!
Hi Magnus ,
Thank You ,
Here are a few points innvery broad terms and notes form
- i think for a thesis you need to listen to the prime minster Imran Khan go off on one on Twitter!
The simple truth is that the British Empire colonial offices had conflicting views, depending on the geographic region HQ Middle East, East Asia, and how to continue its influence from a position of now relative weakness.
The Americans had entered WWII on the condition that Brtian would de-colonise and give up to US markets, in return for US lend lease support.
The British establishment, and security even is actually majorly still anti-american and pro-socialist, although the Brexit movement and Trump has acheived a major breakthorugh to stem this inm the newer generations.
The Saudis (1939 ship meeting) when meeting both the Americans and British seperately found the US to be more understading of the Saudi National interest and customs, whilst the British were still in Imperial mode.
Many Moslem countries preferred the US as a way to rid of the English, and as freedom indeoendence movements (USA itself broke away from Britian in the mianstream narrative- boston Tea Party etc)
Russia/USSR, Chinese Union, Iranian Union, Indian Union, were larger than life entitiies tolerated /formed to stop a single unitary central asian land mass exististing as a single country (along the current Silk road-Turkestan SSR/ Bukhara SSR/Central Asian Stans).
During the 'failed wars' of the past century the miain objective has been to stop this from forming, so many prgroms, antisemitism, and inter-ethnic conflicts were stokes to manage this objective.
The Chinese Union will be left out of this discussion - since its been covered now, but also final points:
as a biffer against Japan is a point to keep in mind, and to contain the -stans was why it has eventually been tolerated, as well as a buffer countering USSR, good commie v bad commie.
Coming to the Indian Union, the British colonial office did not want to leave - Lord mountbatten wanted to continue as Viceroy and King and so it was important to create an Indian Union based on the lines of the Soviet Union to retain as much landmass as possible before the Americans got their hands on it due to the above deal.
If Mountbatten was able to establish himself as Ceremonial King, this would make the British, cuircumvent the agreement to the Americans, and allow British colony to continue as a democracy but linked as mountbatten and king george were first counsins.
As is an open secret lady mountbatten was the village bicycle of RSS Good-cop Nehru.( much like CON-g-RSS shill MP shashi tharoor, who exites the knickers of the marxist left wing snowaflakes.) was using the One-Ganga culture to use illeterate Mullah to rile up Moslems against the Moslem elites, and same agitations withnin sikh, hindu etc, and then use it to play peacemaker.
Gandhi was open to this idea - and hence a possible for motive the assasination pantomime theatre show, since the RSS was happy with the sankritisation the British had introduced but not happy with them staying too long - Gandhi's plan was lot more devious and risky too... so the RSS removed Gandhi and introduced relations with Soviet Union.
Churchill was actually for letting the Indian Union Unravel, possible in hope of finding a more pliants repubilcs or keeping it a free for all like Africa; without delving too much into it - but he was a skilled person reader and he saw straigght through Gandhi for the RSS liar he was.
Churchill famously said the indian Union is as much a unified country as the equator, ie artifical constructs, of idefferent races.
Churchill and Jinnah had great relations between themselves and the US, and so favoured the American outlook hence Pakistans rush to the USA to counter the rival British Colonial office in favour of Mountbattens plans.
This is broadly how the two entities exited the Indian Union.
A further benefit to the Indian Union was that Pakistan would act as a geographic buffer to protect the Indian Union against threat of a historic afghan and Central Asian Expansionism,
(the Afghan king was very close to Sir M. Ikbal the visionary of the Pakistan state - so this fear was very real, and expressed itself as tribal intervention in Kashmir in 1947)
The concept of acting as a buffer against Afghanistan/Uzbekistan for the Indian Union is something even Which until today the landlord classes of the the Pakistani Punjab and sindh have gladly obliged it into, and had an informal trade off with the the Royal Pak Army - in return for providing soldiers - the old feudal model, hence usual tussle between Pak Army and Self-serving Policitcal Class made up of Colonial Era patronised Feudals, since they have conflicting objectives.
This is why Punjab-sindh feudal heavy Pakistan does not have a central asian tilt and has syndrome for trying to out indianise the Indian union.
Pakistan also served as a bullwark for Oil lanes (along with Shah's iran CENTO) to prevent USSR from having warm water sea port access, a key objective of the US.
The Indian Union therefore became even more valuable to the USSR as a super bloc configuration arrangement in stead of as the Hindu Republic of RamRaj or something of the like, and Varanasi Vatican which should really be the natural configurations.
- The major skirmishes/War between the Chinese and USSR were a key reason for USSR projecting the Indian Union in its Image and Keeping it as a alarge bloc to counter China as a Proxy. (similar to an objective of Obamas intended asia tilt, US-Indian union Nuclear deal, artifically inflated Indian Union ecnonomy via bonds etc)
The US tried to wean Indian Union and China away from Soviet union or thought at least it imagined it was doing this - this benefited the Indian Union especially at times of war with pakistan and and gave it more negotiaion power.
Indian Union leverages its links with Soviet bloc allied arab-nationalist or Marxist Moslem countries all the while tickling the US cherry - whereas pakistan was stuck in the american camp - and isolated after 1979 Iranian Marxist Mad Mullah revolution.
The RSS paraded with the Indian Union Army on the victory day parade from the very beginning, Gandhi used to visit their camps and praised and dontated to them.
The RSS had 2 tactical ideological camps:
#1. the hitler camp view whereas the other was
#2. a soviet cialist camp the gandhi -congress group [good cop bad cop].
Althoughthis seems tactical as gandhi himself was an admirer of hitler, and personal friend, who disgustingly advised jews to resist the holocaust by commisint mass suicide - disgusting anti-semeitic thought let alone suggestion.
With benefit of hindsight - The strategy they used was to use a mix of the two camps step by step reach the Nazi stage and ultimately recreate the Ashoka Empire, and use reilgious symbolism and caste symbolism for this.
The Gandhi bloc strategy was to neutralise or subsume non-agreeable into a socialist fairytale land - create a false sense of universalism and hence evenhis martydom must have been staged otherwise he would have been voted out of office and discredited within months of taking office.
Thjis gave rise the ganga-jamna culture or everone is from Indian origin - yet; the vedic literature itself sugests that the hindu relgion was foreign and native to babylonia, and hence simply another invading category of people.
The Sikhs felt the blow of this in 1984 but were unable to make a comeback at all - the false universalism.
Gandhi had iused the same to beguile the south african blacks to their miserable deaths whilst posted a Colonel there.
It seems the RSS were also were working with Hitler to rid of the British - who were the only viable referees between warring relgions creeds castes and differences.
Euopre had long demanded to expel all of its jews into the Medeternanean sea or somewhere else, likewise the Indian union was replication the European calls by terming all muslims as Arabs and demanding they be deported into the desert or into the Arabia sea. Israle and Pakistan became only relgious ideolocial states whereas every other state was other nation state or ecnomic ideological bloc eg Communist blocs,
The latest RSS manifestation is the AAP - and its pseudo liberal face.
The Indian Union can be dissolved into 7 orr 8 regions at least with realtive ease - and the RSS is actually doing a great job at undoing the sticky tape of cunning Gandhi-ism apart - since this give room for ethnic nationalism.
The spread of Bollywood, Yoga, and trying to culturally appropirate everything Central asian/Paksitani and Arabic as Indian, and attempting to penetrate of philosphy and spirtiuality is the influence space the RSS is now competing in - unchallenged.
The imposition of hindi landuage was brtish -Gandhi rouse but has been unsucessful in the Southern Republics like Tamilland etc
The arabian sea used to have alot of Otoman and Mamluk ( incliding Kurdish Mamluk) actitivty aimed at strenghting the Mamluk/Turk/Afgan land dynasties against the european Naval colianism of Protugal and France.
Indina union Naval Supremacy cannot be found in its history -
This weakness will magnify itself and will likely occur though a regime change in Iran, and internal events in Indian Union, Iranian Navy is biggest bakcer of Indian Union navy.
A serious cession call to the Indian union in the tamil coastal state ( Large historic Arabic Population) will really shake it apart - the focus on Khalistan or Kashmir is not its weakness.
Some broad points here... but a historicall detailed and full post will be coming soon --
Summary:
Suffice to say the Indian Union w
as never a Naval power - ie never a superpower, it was always a proxy bloc or a target like Africa is nowadays - even the liees about Mughal who were essentially for the most party a dynsasty run by the slave girls and their Brahmin fathers - is exaclty why the Mughal rule is seen as a pre-decessor to the indina Union and used to justify it - without which there is only the fairly of mahaBharata and some nakedmen running around like hitler yout trying to rewrite hisrtoy - dark people claiming to be Aryans !!
I wonder what used to happen to them RSS Neo-Aryanists in the UK or Germany when they treidn to explain that to Neo-Nazi skinheads - duing the 70s etc...
The best most viable intergratinoist rule in the Eastern Central Asia,
Comes from the Afghan king shah suri - who only rule 4-5 year rule and worked at the speed of light, the Norther half of the Indian union should be re-designated Eastern central Asia as it has more in common with that than the fake artificial Gandhi-Ganges culture. !
Were the Arabs (including Pakistan) [lost wars] would have accepted Israelis early on, which would have been smaller and even more favourable) without the plethora of humiliating defeats - it would have given a greater leverage for a United Semitic front against the Indian Union, and a stronger front against the R-SS hitler youth from re-birth in this way !