hussain0216
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- May 29, 2012
- Messages
- 21,096
- Reaction score
- -22
- Country
- Location
AA
'Taj Mahal used to be a Shiva temple that Mughals destroyed,' says BJP MP Vinay Katiyar
B
Som said the Taj Mahal was built by an emperor who had imprisoned his own father and had targeted many Hindus in his kingdom.Taj Mahal used to be a Hindu temple which was destroyed by Mughals: BJP MP
HIGHLIGHTS
Katiyar, a Parliamentarian who spearheaded the Ayodhya Ram temple movement in the early 1990s, added that the Taj Mahal is built on the exact spot where there used to be a Shivaling. He also said the Mughals destroyed all Hindu places of worship.
"The Taj Mahal is a Hindu temple. There are all the signs there of (Hindu) gods and goddesses, There used to be a Shivaling there which had water dripping on it from up top. That ling was removed and a mausoleum built there," said the BJP MP.
The Taj Mahal controversy began earlier this week when an Uttar Pradesh (UP) legislator from the BJP said it didn't represent Indian culture as it was built by Mughals "who wanted to wipe out Hindus". The legislator, Sangeet Som, also called all the Mughal emperors "traitors".
He was then roundly berated by opposition parties for his comments.
Yesterday, UP chief minister Adityanath waded into the controversy and expressed views different to that of Som.
"It does not matter who built it (Taj Mahal) and for what reason; it was built by blood and sweat of Indian labourers," said Adityanath, in what party insiders said was a reprimand to Som.
Earlier this month, an Uttar Pradesh government booklet to promote tourist spots in the state omitted the Taj Mahal from its list of the State's historical sites.
"Many were sad when the Taj Mahal was removed from the list of historical places. What kind of history? What place's history? Whose history? The history that the man who built the Taj Mahal imprisoned his father? The history that he wanted to wipe out the Hindus from all of Uttar Pradesh and India?" asked Som.
In June this year, Adityanath had expressed views similar to Som's.
He said that "the Ramayana and the Gita represent Indian culture and the Taj Mahal doesn't."
'Taj Mahal used to be a Shiva temple that Mughals destroyed,' says BJP MP Vinay Katiyar
B
Som said the Taj Mahal was built by an emperor who had imprisoned his own father and had targeted many Hindus in his kingdom.Taj Mahal used to be a Hindu temple which was destroyed by Mughals: BJP MP
HIGHLIGHTS
- Katiyar is one of those who spearheadeded the Ayodhya Ram temple movement in the early 1990s
- He said the Mughals destroyed all Hindu places of worship including a temple that was where the Taj Mahal now stands
- Yesterday, UP CM Adityanath said the Taj mahal was built "by the blood and sweat of Indian labourers'
Katiyar, a Parliamentarian who spearheaded the Ayodhya Ram temple movement in the early 1990s, added that the Taj Mahal is built on the exact spot where there used to be a Shivaling. He also said the Mughals destroyed all Hindu places of worship.
"The Taj Mahal is a Hindu temple. There are all the signs there of (Hindu) gods and goddesses, There used to be a Shivaling there which had water dripping on it from up top. That ling was removed and a mausoleum built there," said the BJP MP.
The Taj Mahal controversy began earlier this week when an Uttar Pradesh (UP) legislator from the BJP said it didn't represent Indian culture as it was built by Mughals "who wanted to wipe out Hindus". The legislator, Sangeet Som, also called all the Mughal emperors "traitors".
He was then roundly berated by opposition parties for his comments.
Yesterday, UP chief minister Adityanath waded into the controversy and expressed views different to that of Som.
"It does not matter who built it (Taj Mahal) and for what reason; it was built by blood and sweat of Indian labourers," said Adityanath, in what party insiders said was a reprimand to Som.
Earlier this month, an Uttar Pradesh government booklet to promote tourist spots in the state omitted the Taj Mahal from its list of the State's historical sites.
"Many were sad when the Taj Mahal was removed from the list of historical places. What kind of history? What place's history? Whose history? The history that the man who built the Taj Mahal imprisoned his father? The history that he wanted to wipe out the Hindus from all of Uttar Pradesh and India?" asked Som.
In June this year, Adityanath had expressed views similar to Som's.
He said that "the Ramayana and the Gita represent Indian culture and the Taj Mahal doesn't."