What's new

IN PAKISTAN, WHO IS KILLING WHOM

Me, personally? You're going to have to be more specific.

Otherwise, it's slander on your part. And slander that is meant to incite or justify mass-murder is a crime against humanity. That's what Nazi publisher Streicher was executed for after WWII.
You arguments only revolve around few words. Pointing fingers at Pakistan while conveniently denying and ignoring your own shortcomings only goes on to prove how much of brainwashed you are
 
.
You arguments only revolve around few words. Pointing fingers at Pakistan while conveniently denying and ignoring your own shortcomings only goes on to prove how much of brainwashed you are
Just because a person has faults doesn't make their arguments invalid. People conditioned to think that are truly the ones who have been brainwashed.
 
. .
Just because a person has faults doesn't make their arguments invalid. People conditioned to think that are truly the ones who have been brainwashed.
No, the person who consistently fails to acknowledge the shortcomings and deny them his arguments carries no significant worth. How can one rectify the shortcomings if one fails to acknowledge it in first place.
 
. . . .
First of all, NADRA doesn't allow Muslims to change their religion and I think atheism is not recognized by Islamic Republic of Pakistan. So most of them will be either ex-Muslims or in some cases ex-Christians.

Once you change religion, you are still Muslim so number of deaths of Muslims rise on paper but in reality that person may have left his religion and convert to other religion or no religion at all. So they become apostate and people kill them for their choice. So number of casualities is false and you cannot give exact number of casualitues of minority groups because these people are not counted in minority group.

Ahmadi people are very good at hiding. Also they leave country as soon as they get a chance. So their numbers are low and you should compare percentage not numbers.
 
.
No, the person who consistently fails to acknowledge the shortcomings and deny them his arguments carries no significant worth. How can one rectify the shortcomings if one fails to acknowledge it in first place.
Because the topic thread is about Pakistan. The shortcomings of you and your countrymen, not me and mine. The shortcomings to discuss here are those of Pakistan, not those of the U.S.

Pure bloods do not considers others as human being, hence the result is dismissive attitude to n ignorant level
Spoken like a true Death Eater!
 
.
Because the topic thread is about Pakistan. The shortcomings of you and your countrymen, not me and mine. The shortcomings to discuss here are those of Pakistan, not those of the U.S.

Spoken like a true Death Eater!
Please, lets not act naive here. YOu even know how you dodge the real question and when posed with question, you wil dismiss it by calling a guy brainwashed, biased, anti semitic, but you will never acknowledge the shortcomings and gross human rights violation carried out by your people on daily basi. Which is why you can never address them. Yet, you have the audacity to point fingers at other and create this much hype while ignoring what goes on illegally invaded lands.

Spoken like a true Death Eater!
Seems like watching Harry potter is your daily chore after retirement
 
.
Please, lets not act naive here. YOu even know how you dodge the real question and when posed with question, you wil dismiss it by calling a guy brainwashed, biased, anti semitic, but you will never acknowledge the shortcomings and gross human rights violation carried out by your people -
It's off topic, an ad hominem fallacy, and false to boot.

Three strikes, you need to be out. It'll take courage and force of arms to kick you guys out of the Establishment, I suppose. Otherwise, Pakistanis are accepting that it's the inmates who are running their asylum.

Arms don't seem to be a problem in Pakistan. But without the forces of greed, religious hate, and fib-fuelled murderous prejudice, where is courage going to come from?
 
.
It's off topic, an ad hominem fallacy, and false to boot.

Three strikes, you need to be out. It'll take courage and force of arms to kick you guys out of the Establishment, I suppose. Otherwise, Pakistanis are accepting that it's the inmates who are running their asylum.

Arms don't seem to be a problem in Pakistan. But without the forces of greed, religious hate, and fib-fuelled murderous prejudice, where is courage going to come from?
LOL. What would you say about an entity that is based on illegally invaded land ? What steps have you taken, if any to voice your support form basic human right ? caging human beings in an open air is poilcy world war 2 era you people should know better of the distress faced with such situation, yet only after few years you guys started experimenting force, intimidation technique on poor helpless people. So you so-called champion of human right passivley agree and adhere that a non jew should be treated as such ? otherwise the least you can do ( which you are afraid to tdo ) is voice the support or at least acknowledge it
 
.
It's off topic, an ad hominem fallacy, and false to boot.

Three strikes, you need to be out. It'll take courage and force of arms to kick you guys out of the Establishment, I suppose. Otherwise, Pakistanis are accepting that it's the inmates who are running their asylum.

Arms don't seem to be a problem in Pakistan. But without the forces of greed, religious hate, and fib-fuelled murderous prejudice, where is courage going to come from?

From Israel offcourse! where killing innocent children and women, and oppressing the weak is a national past time.
 
.
LOL. What would you say about an entity that is based on illegally invaded land ?
Jordan's twenty-year occupation of "the West Bank"? China's invasion of Tibet? Morocco's takeover of the Western Sahara? Turkey's invasion of Northern Cyprus? You don't have anything to say about them, do you? If a "universal" is only applied to Jews, then it's antisemitism and nothing else.

For as pointed many times before, when it comes to Israel no Pakistani can justly accuse Israel of any malfeasance, since Pakistan's H.E.C. says loyalty to the "Palestinian cause" isn't a matter of debate but of obedience. If you can't debate the good or bad, anything you voice about the situation isn't a judgement, it's only posturing.
 
.
Jordan's twenty-year occupation of "the West Bank"? China's invasion of Tibet? Morocco's takeover of the Western Sahara? Turkey's invasion of Northern Cyprus? You don't have anything to say about them, do you? If a "universal" is only applied to Jews, then it's antisemitism and nothing else.

For as pointed many times before, when it comes to Israel no Pakistani can justly accuse Israel of any malfeasance, since Pakistan's H.E.C. says loyalty to the "Palestinian cause" isn't a matter of debate but of obedience. If you can't debate the good or bad, anything you voice about the situation isn't a judgement, it's only posturing.

You forget to mention Zionist occupation of Palestine and Hindu occupation of Kashmir.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom