In Madrid people throw their garbage at the banks entrance

[INDIC]

Z.A.B was against capitalism... and his nationalisation of industries screwed our economy...

Z A B was a feudal socialist(or pseudo-socialist) owning estates in Larkana. He only targeted Industries but brought no land reforms.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Z A B was a feudal socialist(or pseudo-socialist) owning estates in Larkana. He only targeted Industries but brought no land reforms.

Actually he did bring land reforms...in 1972... and in 77... though not very successful coz of various reasons...

 

[Desert Fox]

Why do you think they forgave all to Hitler? He violated the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, built the army, the navy, the military-industrial complex, annexed Austria and annexed the Ruhr Basin - which, incidentally, was the industrial heart of Germany, coal and plants. Because, until 1939, Hitler acted strictly contractual terms between him and England.
The main condition of the contract - to attack the Soviet Union. Gitler tried to get away from the influence of the Anglo-Saxons - but failed in the end.

All of that was in the National interest of Germany, which any Nationalist would aspire to do for their country. Austria voted to be a part of Germany.

What Hitler did was he started printing his own interest free money. That was what the Zionist bankers did not like about him. And that is why Churchill advised Stalin to invade Europe as soon as possible.

International - means that there is no upper and lower nations. Where I said that you need to conquer? I only said that it is best to socialist economy would work for the good of all humanity, if it is worldwide and will build on the resources of the world.

So what if there are upper and lower nations? How will you "equalize" them?? Will you force Socialism on the nations that are not willing to accept it?

 

[vostok]

All of that was in the National interest of Germany, which any Nationalist would aspire to do for their country. Austria voted to be a part of Germany.

What Hitler did was he started printing his own interest free money. That was what the Zionist bankers did not like about him. And that is why Churchill advised Stalin to invade Europe as soon as possible.

Stalin tried many times to stop Hitler. He is the only one who agreed to help Czechoslovakia - but Poland and Romania refused to allow Soviet troops . Poland, by the way, was an ally of Hitler and took part in the division of Czechoslovakia .
Who do you think helps Hitler to come to power? Who sponsored his party before she got the power? Who taught him the art of public speaking , the basics of government and the army ?
The Anglo-Saxons . Hitler was Angloman and considered English brotherly people. He tried until the last moment to prevent a war with England. Remember the " phony war "?
Hitler had written many times , and even in Mein Kampf that the war on two fronts - suicide. Why would he attack on the Soviet Union ? Because they pressed him. He would simply be killed if he did not. That is - or suicide attack on the Soviet Union , or death.

So what if there are upper and lower nations? How will you "equalize" them?? Will you force Socialism on the nations that are not willing to accept it?

There no higher and lower nations. Or would you like to Pakistan was conquered by American, British or the Germans and the Pakistanis have made slaves? Do you think they can not? Easily. In the mountains there will be some resistance, and in the cities all your countrymen will be subhuman.
Nobody is forcing people to move to socialism. It will happen sooner or later itself. Either we move towards socialism, or return to feudalism.

 

[Desert Fox]

Stalin tried many times to stop Hitler. He is the only one who agreed to help Czechoslovakia - but Poland and Romania refused to allow Soviet troops . Poland, by the way, was an ally of Hitler and took part in the division of Czechoslovakia .
Who do you think helps Hitler to come to power? Who sponsored his party before she got the power? Who taught him the art of public speaking , the basics of government and the army ?
The Anglo-Saxons . Hitler was Angloman and considered English brotherly people. He tried until the last moment to prevent a war with England. Remember the " phony war "?
Hitler had written many times , and even in Mein Kampf that the war on two fronts - suicide. Why would he attack on the Soviet Union ? Because they pressed him. He would simply be killed if he did not. That is - or suicide attack on the Soviet Union , or death.

Hitler invaded Czechoslovakia to take back the ethnic German Sudetenland. Poland invaded to take back Polish territory given to Czechoslovakia. Romania was a German ally. Hitler invaded Poland to take back the Danzig corridor which was 97% ethnic German. The Polish gov.t was persecuting the German population of Danzig.

Why did Britain and France declare war on Hitler? Why did Soviet Union ally with Capitalist Britain and America?

In the end it was Stalin who collaborated with the Capitalist.

Do you know who started the Communist movement? The Zionist bankers.

There no higher and lower nations. Or would you like to Pakistan was conquered by American, British or the Germans and the Pakistanis have made slaves? Do you think they can not? Easily. In the mountains there will be some resistance, and in the cities all your countrymen will be subhuman.
Nobody is forcing people to move to socialism. It will happen sooner or later itself. Either we move towards socialism, or return to feudalism.

Okay, so explain to me how you intend on "internationalizing" your brand of Socialism?

And Germany invading Pakistan sounds very unlikely. British already did invade but left some 50 years ago.

 

[duhastmish]

Madrid is falling apart. Most shops are closed go to that garden and castle area behind mayors cafe most shops are closed even near the Real Madrid ground all the malls and eateries are almost shut. Houses near the ground on road which goes to airport look at their condition they look abundand for years. All the real estate shops are closed near the bank area . Looks like it will need lot of time and effort to get back in shape

 

[vostok]

Hitler invaded Czechoslovakia to take back the ethnic German Sudetenland. Poland invaded to take back Polish territory given to Czechoslovakia. Romania was a German ally. Hitler invaded Poland to take back the Danzig corridor which was 97% ethnic German. The Polish gov.t was persecuting the German population of Danzig.

Why did Britain and France declare war on Hitler? Why did Soviet Union ally with Capitalist Britain and America?

In the end it was Stalin who collaborated with the Capitalist.

Do you know who started the Communist movement? The Zionist bankers.

Until 1939, the Soviet Union was considered the main enemy of Hitler.
The west liked Hitler - he was a man of the year by the magazine "Times" . He was granted the right to host BOHT Olympics - summer and winter . This is a unique case , this never happened again.
They helped Hitler take over Europe - in countries bordering the Soviet Union came to power the fascist regimes - Hitler's allies . More precisely - they were put in power the Anglo-Saxons .
Why West started war wiht Hitler? Due to Poland? No. Czechoslovakia , too, was an alliance treaty with France and Britain . The war started because Hitler wanted to be equel with Anglosaks .
He wanted to create an independent financial and colonial system . After the failure of negotiations with Britain and France , Hitler appealed to Stalin .
In turn , Stalin, after all his attempts to create an alliance with Britain and France before the war failed turned to Hitler. Stalin needed time - at least 2 years. Just over the 2 years will be created a T-34 and others equipment. If it were not for those two years - the USSR would have lost several times more people .
BHW - I know who sponsored revolutioners of Russia - the same people who sponsored Hitler.
They just did not expect Stalin come to power and kill all those Jews-Trozkiests.

Okay, so explain to me how you intend on "internationalizing" your brand of Socialism?

And Germany invading Pakistan sounds very unlikely. British already did invade but left some 50 years ago.

Germany, Britain, Americans doesn't matter - I mean If Germanic tribes will declare their superiority and enslave Pakistan and turn all Pakistanis to slaves, as they did to African once.
The USSR was a socialist country, and there was no higher and lower races. This is the internationalism - in the friendship of peoples.

 

[Desert Fox]

Until 1939, the Soviet Union was considered the main enemy of Hitler.
The west liked Hitler - he was a man of the year by the magazine "Times" . He was granted the right to host BOHT Olympics - summer and winter . This is a unique case , this never happened again.
They helped Hitler take over Europe - in countries bordering the Soviet Union came to power the fascist regimes - Hitler's allies . More precisely - they were put in power the Anglo-Saxons .
Why West started war wiht Hitler? Due to Poland? No. Czechoslovakia , too, was an alliance treaty with France and Britain . The war started because Hitler wanted to be equel with Anglosaks .
He wanted to create an independent financial and colonial system . After the failure of negotiations with Britain and France , Hitler appealed to Stalin .
In turn , Stalin, after all his attempts to create an alliance with Britain and France before the war failed turned to Hitler. Stalin needed time - at least 2 years. Just over the 2 years will be created a T-34 and others equipment. If it were not for those two years - the USSR would have lost several times more people .
BHW - I know who sponsored revolutioners of Russia - the same people who sponsored Hitler.
They just did not expect Stalin come to power and kill all those Jews-Trozkiests.

You are right about some of the things you said above.

1). Yes, they (the bankers) initially provided Hitler with financial support to bring him into power.

BUT, they immediately cut their support after Hitler turned against them when he seized the production of money from them and confiscated their wealth and he improved the conditions of the common German, namely the workers and the peasants.

This fact is supported by the Bolshevik C.G. Rakovsky:
Rakovsky said:

“Hitler took over the privilege of manufacturing money, and not only physical moneys, but also financial ones. He took over the machinery of falsification and put it to work for the benefit of the people. Can you possibly imagine what would have come if this had infected a number of other states?” (Henry Makow, "Hitler Did Not Want War," www.savethemales.com March 21, 2004).


2). In which countries bordering the Soviet Union did the the Anglo-Americans help to bring about pro-German gov.t's?

Rather, did not Britain and American overthrow the pro-German Yugoslav gov.t???

3). Yes, Soviet Union, from the time of Lenin, aspired to take over Europe, way before Hitler even came to power.

Germany, Britain, Americans doesn't matter- I mean If Germanic tribes will declare their superiority and enslave Pakistan and turn all Pakistanis to slaves, as they did to African once.

That is a big IF. Because you see, Germany did not do that. In fact, before WW2 and even during WW2, Germany was the only European country that did not have overseas colonies.

The USSR was a socialist country, and there was no higher and lower races. This is the internationalism - in the friendship of peoples.

This is pure fantasy. Such a system can never function, which is among a number of reasons why Communism failed.

Everyone is NOT equal, and one cannot "equalize" everyone. There are some people who possess better skills than others. There are those who have more potential than others. And thus, due to this disparity they are better suited to lead in their respective fields of expertise. Not everyone can be a leader as not all possess leadership qualities. This is natural.

Would you want millions of African and other non-Russian/Slavic immigrants to flood Russia and destroy Russian/Slavic culture and identity?

This is not Socialism, this is illogical.

 

[vostok]

You are right about some of the things you said above.

1). Yes, they (the bankers) initially provided Hitler with financial support to bring him into power.

BUT, they immediately cut their support after Hitler turned against them when he seized the production of money from them and confiscated their wealth and he improved the conditions of the common German, namely the workers and the peasants.

This fact is supported by the Bolshevik C.G. Rakovsky:
Rakovsky said:

“Hitler took over the privilege of manufacturing money, and not only physical moneys, but also financial ones. He took over the machinery of falsification and put it to work for the benefit of the people. Can you possibly imagine what would have come if this had infected a number of other states?” (Henry Makow, "Hitler Did Not Want War," www.savethemales.com March 21, 2004).

They done their job - brought Hitler to power. Now he had to do his job - to build a huge, bloated militaristic complex (as in our time in the U.S.) and attack the main rival of the West - the USSR.

2). In which countries bordering the Soviet Union did the the Anglo-Americans help to bring about pro-German gov.t's?
Rather, did not Britain and American overthrow the pro-German Yugoslav gov.t???

Poland, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria - neighbors of the Soviet Union, which was not democracy, but were fascist regimes allied Germany.
Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe at the time was only Czechoslovakia.

3). Yes, Soviet Union, from the time of Lenin, aspired to take over Europe, way before Hitler even came to power.

Lenin also had to repay debts - take sponsoring by the Anglo-Saxons is not free . He had to carry the revolution to the world "untill the last Russian soldier " - that was the agreement . It is for this Anglo-Saxons fed and watered all Russian revolutionaries from the Decembrists to nowadays - to destroy Russia from inside. It is for this purpose London now give refuge to all sorts of "Berezovskies", "Litvinenkos" , Chechen terrorists , liberals, and other beasts of Russia .
But Stalin did not had debt to West - he did not cooperate with them. According to plans of the Anglo-Saxon power from Lenin had to go to Trotsky and other Jews - and then the Civil War in Russia and attempts to spread the revolution would cease only when Russia has gone . Then Russia would be conquered and divided .

That is a big IF. Because you see, Germany did not do that. In fact, before WW2 and even during WW2, Germany was the only European country that did not have overseas colonies.

I meant that if the Germanic tribes (Germany, Holland, England, Sweden and others) have now come to National Socialism and the German peoples proclaimed superior race - they would have won the colonies and would make slaves of the local population.

This is pure fantasy. Such a system can never function, which is among a number of reasons why Communism failed.

This system has existed for 70 years, it would last further, if the enemy would not able to bring to power in the state apparat and in the Party command of traitors. In the Soviet Union was made a huge mistake in the Communist Party itself, not in the state system - the transfer of power. There was no such mechanism. If the power would change like in China - problems would not exist.

Everyone is NOT equal, and one cannot "equalize" everyone. There are some people who possess better skills than others. There are those who have more potential than others. And thus, due to this disparity they are better suited to lead in their respective fields of expertise. Not everyone can be a leader as not all possess leadership qualities. This is natural.

Would you want millions of African and other non-Russian/Slavic immigrants to flood Russia and destroy Russian/Slavic culture and identity?

This is not Socialism, this is illogical.

Are you agree that your nation might become a nation of slaves, inferior race ? I do not think so .
A Russian does not want to be a nation of oppressors - we never counqered anyone in order to enslave them . Georgians , Balts , Finnish, Central Asians - after they joined Russia their life become much better than before.
I do not want Russian to proclaimed ourself a super race and began enslaving all non-Russians and non-Slavic. It's not right way, Russia will never go such a way.
Why should someone to emigrate somewhere ?
Look at the Socialistic countries.

No one was pushed to go far, to leave his country . Of course , the Soviet Union could destroy the economy in these countries , forcing local residents to go for the incomes to the Soviet Union , where they would pay 5 times less than the citizens of the USSR . So make the EU now - they destroy the economy of the new members and forcing them to migrate to the West , where they live and work like a slaves.
But this is - the wrong way. Socialism above all - humanistic . The economy is developing in each country - factories , schools and institutes are built. So noone need to go anywhere .
give refuge
give refuge

 

[flamer84]

Poland, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria - neighbors of the Soviet Union, which was not democracy, but were fascist regimes allied Germany.
Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe at the time was only Czechoslovakia.

Crap.Poland didn't have a "fascist" regime while Romania crushed it's own "fascists" in 1941 right under the nose of the germans.

Legionnaires' rebellion and Bucharest pogrom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Desert Fox]

They done their job - brought Hitler to power. Now he had to do his job - to build a huge, bloated militaristic complex (as in our time in the U.S.) and attack the main rival of the West - the USSR.

1). But then why would they attack him?? Why did they assist Stalin if they planned to destroy Soviet Union??

That doesn't make any sense!

In the end it was Stalin who received billions in military and financial assistance from Capitalist West, it was Stalin who the American and British Capitalists called "Uncle Joe!", NOT Hitler.


2). It was the USSR under Stalin that had a huge, bloated military industrial complex with more than 20,000 Tanks, 10,000 aircraft, and 1 million paratroopers with millions of soldiers and artillery. When Germans invade USSR they only invaded with 3,000 Tanks, 3,000 aircraft, and 5-7,000 artillery pieces.

Poland, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria - neighbors of the Soviet Union, which was not democracy, but were fascist regimes allied Germany.
Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe at the time was only Czechoslovakia.

So why did Britain and American overthrow pro-German gov.t of Yugoslavia???

Lenin also had to repay debts - take sponsoring by the Anglo-Saxons is not free . He had to carry the revolution to the world "untill the last Russian soldier " - that was the agreement . It is for this Anglo-Saxons fed and watered all Russian revolutionaries from the Decembrists to nowadays - to destroy Russia from inside. It is for this purpose London now give refuge to all sorts of "Berezovskies", "Litvinenkos" , Chechen terrorists , liberals, and other beasts of Russia .
But Stalin did not had debt to West - he did not cooperate with them. According to plans of the Anglo-Saxon power from Lenin had to go to Trotsky and other Jews - and then the Civil War in Russia and attempts to spread the revolution would cease only when Russia has gone . Then Russia would be conquered and divided .

Stalin, just like Lenin, had expansionist goals. He helped to spread Communism to China, North Korea, and other parts of the world. And his successors continued this by helping to spread Communism to Vietnam, Cambodia, Africa and even Latin America.

And secondly, there were still a lot of Jews in the Soviet Communist regime under Stalins rule, one of the most prominent ones and a mass murderer by the name of Lavrentiy Beria

Other prominent Jews and mass murderers under Stalinist regime were Lazar Kaganovich, and Genrikh Yagoda. Stalin's Jews - Israel Opinion, Ynetnews

I meant that if the Germanic tribes (Germany, Holland, England, Sweden and others) have now come to National Socialism and the German peoples proclaimed superior race - they would have won the colonies and would make slaves of the local population.

But they did not do that. They invaded North Africa and they did not "enslave" any Arabs or Berbers.
Jews, Poles, and other political enemies are a whole different story, but even they were treated better than how Stalin treated his political enemies and enemy POW's in the GULAGs of Siberia.

This system has existed for 70 years, it would last further, if the enemy would not able to bring to power in the state apparat and in the Party command of traitors. In the Soviet Union was made a huge mistake in the Communist Party itself, not in the state system - the transfer of power. There was no such mechanism. If the power would change like in China - problems would not exist.

China is not a purely Communist state. Communism is a failed system despite many Communists tried to change it continually throughout the years since its inception.

Are you agree that your nation might become a nation of slaves, inferior race ? I do not think so .

Of course not, but Hitler never aspired to invade and take over South Asia.

National Socialism= Every nation and people possesses the right to self preservation.

Can you please quote from Mein Kampf where Hitler said he wanted to "enslave" all "inferior" (non-German) races.

A Russian does not want to be a nation of oppressors - we never counqered anyone in order to enslave them . Georgians , Balts , Finnish, Central Asians - after they joined Russia their life become much better than before.
I do not want Russian to proclaimed ourself a super race and began enslaving all non-Russians and non-Slavic. It's not right way, Russia will never go such a way.

The Baltic people never wanted to be a part of Russia, which is why they joined forces with the Germans, and which is why to this day they regard Estonian, Lithuanian, and Latvian Waffen SS soldiers as National Heroes.

Finland never wanted to be a part of Russia and fought against Soviet invasion.

If these countries were proud to be a part of Soviet Union they would not have separated.

Why should someone to emigrate somewhere ?

You want "international" "universal" Socialism then please let millions of illiterate and poor Africans, Arabs, and Mexican immigrants into your country and share your Mother Russia's wealth with them for free.

As i said in my previous post: Would you want millions of African and other non-Russian/Slavic immigrants to flood Russia and destroy Russian/Slavic culture and identity?

Look at the Socialistic countries.

No one was pushed to go far, to leave his country . Of course , the Soviet Union could destroy the economy in these countries , forcing local residents to go for the incomes to the Soviet Union , where they would pay 5 times less than the citizens of the USSR . So make the EU now - they destroy the economy of the new members and forcing them to migrate to the West , where they live and work like a slaves.
But this is - the wrong way. Socialism above all - humanistic . The economy is developing in each country - factories , schools and institutes are built. So noone need to go anywhere .
give refuge
give refuge

No one helps anyone for free of charge. If Russia gives assistance to a country then it expects something in return.

India is not a Socialist country, and from most of these country millions of people migrate to West.

Communism failed wherever it was implemented, and not a single NATO soldier put foot on Soviet soil.

Capitalism is exploitation of the weak, but Communism has so many shortcomings that make it a failed system. It is against the natural law.

Why Communism failed:

1). No Freedom of religious practice.

2). No Freedom of speech.

3). Does not permit the right to own property.

4). No emphasis on the importance of the individual.

5). Equalizes the masses through coercion.

 

[vostok]

1). But then why would they attack him?? Why did they assist Stalin if they planned to destroy Soviet Union??

That doesn't make any sense!

In the end it was Stalin who received billions in military and financial assistance from Capitalist West, it was Stalin who the American and British Capitalists called "Uncle Joe!", NOT Hitler.

Before the war, Harry Truman said - if Russian will win, we will help the German, if Germans will win - we will help Russian. So they acted. Some West companies continued to trade with Hitler until 1944.
Gitler and Nazi Germany were created for one purpose - to destroy the Soviet Union. When Hitler in 1939, refused to attack the Soviet Union - he came out of the submission. So he had to be destroyed. Of course, do not want to fight the Anglo-Saxons. But did everything to Hitler eventually invaded the Soviet Union.

2). It was the USSR under Stalin that had a huge, bloated military industrial complex with more than 20,000 Tanks, 10,000 aircraft, and 1 million paratroopers with millions of soldiers and artillery. When Germans invade USSR they only invaded with 3,000 Tanks, 3,000 aircraft, and 5-7,000 artillery pieces.

USSR twenty times larger than Germany, 3 times more than the United States - of course, the vast country must have a huge army.

So why did Britain and American overthrow pro-German gov.t of Yugoslavia???

When? In 1944?

Stalin, just like Lenin, had expansionist goals. He helped to spread Communism to China, North Korea, and other parts of the world. And his successors continued this by helping to spread Communism to Vietnam, Cambodia, Africa and even Latin America.

USSR supported the anti-Western, anti-colonialist, anti-imperialist movements in the Third World. USSR was not profited from the fact that the communist regime was installed somewhere. USSR did not claimed to be super-nation, created to rule others. Maximum - "Big brother". I would prefer to have an older brother than a master-exploiter, and you?

And secondly, there were still a lot of Jews in the Soviet Communist regime under Stalins rule, one of the most prominent ones and a mass murderer by the name of Lavrentiy Beria

Other prominent Jews and mass murderers under Stalinist regime were Lazar Kaganovich, and Genrikh Yagoda. Stalin's Jews - Israel Opinion, Ynetnews

So what? Not all Jews - bankers and imperialists. Stalin cleared the country from agents of the West, and not just the Jews, as Hitler did.

But they did not do that. They invaded North Africa and they did not "enslave" any Arabs or Berbers.
Jews, Poles, and other political enemies are a whole different story, but even they were treated better than how Stalin treated his political enemies and enemy POW's in the GULAGs of Siberia.

The War in North Africa - unimportant episode of the war. Hitler just had no time to enslave the nomadic tribes.
Again you do not understand me. While the German tribes again proclaim himself supernatsiey and other people - less than human, they will make slaves of your people. You will not get better because of all the land around you will belong to Germanic (Swedish, English, Dutch) colonist, and you will become his slave.
What a Gulag? Most of what you read about the "atrocities of Stalin" - invented by Goebbels and his followers in the United States and Britain.
In the United States during the Great Depression, according to various estimates died 3-8 million people from starvation - have you heard about this? I think not. BUT 1000000 times you've heard about the "atrocities of Stalin." In the U.S. per capita is much more prisoners nowadsys than it was under Stalin. In Ukraine, now 30 times more police per capita than it was under Stalin.

China is not a purely Communist state. Communism is a failed system despite many Communists tried to change it continually throughout the years since its inception.

I know that today's China - not a communist country. I talked about the fact that China has a well-established mechanism of transfer of power. In the USSR, such a mechanism was not, which is why the authorities were able to come to the agents of the West, the system will fall apart from the inside.

Of course not, but Hitler never aspired to invade and take over South Asia.

National Socialism= Every nation and people possesses the right to self preservation.

Can you please quote from Mein Kampf where Hitler said he wanted to "enslave" all "inferior" (non-German) races.

If Germany and Japan would have won the USSR - some of them would become the owner of Pakistan. You'd be somebody's slave, as we are.
Hitler proclaimed the need to "fight for living space" for the German nation. What do you think - he wanted it to Mars win? No. Germany wanted to expand at the expense of their neighbors. In the conquered lands of the Germans to become landowners and gentlemen, and other nations - slaves.

The Baltic people never wanted to be a part of Russia, which is why they joined forces with the Germans, and which is why to this day they regard Estonian, Lithuanian, and Latvian Waffen SS soldiers as National Heroes.

Finland never wanted to be a part of Russia and fought against Soviet invasion.

If these countries were proud to be a part of Soviet Union they would not have separated.

This is not true. Most of the population of the Baltic states - workers and peasants wanted to be part of the Soviet Union and welcomed the decision of their authorities . Because they live poorer and had almoust no rights than the workers and peasants in the Soviet Union .
Soviet Union did not intend to include Finland - the task was to push the frontier from Leningrad. Finland was proposed an exchange offer - land near Leningrad to vast areas in Karelia. As a result, Finland has received neither the one nor the other .
The cult of Nazism in the modern Baltic states artificially fueled by the West - is part of an anti-Russian propaganda, which is provided in all countries and spheres of life.

You want "international" "universal" Socialism then please let millions of illiterate and poor Africans, Arabs, and Mexican immigrants into your country and share your Mother Russia's wealth with them for free.
As i said in my previous post: Would you want millions of African and other non-Russian/Slavic immigrants to flood Russia and destroy Russian/Slavic culture and identity?

No one helps anyone for free of charge. If Russia gives assistance to a country then it expects something in return.

Why would they want to go somewhere, if we will help them to build factories, universities? hospitals, schools? They will be working at home - it is better to live at home and work than go somewhere, right? Exactly in that way the Soviet Union was acting - he tried to pull up the standard of living in the third world. People in Eastern Europe - Czechoslovakia, Hungary, East Germany, lived richer than in the USSR. But the Soviet Union never attempted to make them poorer, to enrich themselves, this is the difference between the USSR and the West.

India is not a Socialist country, and from most of these country millions of people migrate to West.

India got on the map because there was a time when there were going to build socialism.

Communism failed wherever it was implemented, and not a single NATO soldier put foot on Soviet soil.

Capitalism is exploitation of the weak, but Communism has so many shortcomings that make it a failed system. It is against the natural law.

Decomposition of the feudal system and the transition to capitalism began in Italy in the 13-14 centuries - Italy has been advanced state. And it ended only in 19-20 centuries. And in some states, there is still feudalism .
However , capitalism has replaced feudalism - although it took several centuries. There have been cases where after the Bourgeois Revolution came the Restoration . Exactly the same things we can see now - after more progressive social system will return to the past. It does not mean anything . Progress will either go ahead - and mankind will move to socialism in the following centuries. Or progress will stop and we will be back in the Middle Ages .
It is the law of evolution. It works just as well in biology as in social unit.

Why Communism failed:

1). No Freedom of religious practice.

It is not true, no one forbade people to go to church - except for the period of Trotskyism. My mother was baptized. Putin was baptized. Of course, classmates could laugh at you, but the ban was not.

2). No Freedom of speech.

You should not confuse freedom of speech with an attempt to destroy the state. In the Soviet Union there was a true democracy - that is, the power of the people, not the power of bankers.

3). Does not permit the right to own property.

Also not true. Under Stalin, there were allowed the collective non-state enterprises. They were covering the half needs for food, shoes, clothes and alcohol in the USSR.

Khrushchev had forbidden it. Like so many things - essentially, he laid the foundation for the future collapse of the Soviet Union.

4). No emphasis on the importance of the individual.

Not true. In the USSR, there were much more opportunity for self-realization than in the West. Anyone with even a peasant from the remotest settlements could easily get the best education by his choice and do exactly what he wants.

5). Equalizes the masses through coercion.

People are equal by birth and have equal rights. In the Soviet Union it was so. In the West, a man is judged by his financial account, and not on the individual qualities. This is absurd.