Coltsfan
BANNED
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2010
- Messages
- 904
- Reaction score
- -2
Yes! Ure right cuz US don't have B@llz to invade Iran Period......
That is what Saddam thought too...... how well did that end for him?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes! Ure right cuz US don't have B@llz to invade Iran Period......
Saddam thought that? Who told you? Baghdad Bob?That is what Saddam thought too...... how well did that end for him?
what does it mean for pakistan - negatives and positives?
how should pakistan react - support? resist? stay neutral?
please discuss, indians welcome to answer the same questions as well, but replace pakistan with india - just to give a different perspective.
If they are invaded, it would be good for us. Because if Iran does get Nuclear weapons - then this will start a nuclear-arms race in the middle east.
If they are invaded, it would be good for us. Because if Iran does get Nuclear weapons - then this will start a nuclear-arms race in the middle east.
LOLX....Never good for us. All Muslim countries should get Nuclear power
Don't serve US policies to weaken Muslim world
With all due respect, I believe you are partially incorrect. The route of Iraq is quite possible as I don't think Iraqis are willing to strike coming Israeli aircrafts, nor do I think they have anti aircraft equipment strong enough to shoot down those aicrafts. As for Syria, the country is in a state of chaos currently and I think Al Assad is more worried about killing his people than protecting Iran.the route who pass by iraq and syria you most forget about it
the turkish route is not guarnteed becouse for turkey to allow a strike from there land can cause big problmes
that leaves the saudi route
Doubt Iran's ever gonna be invaded US