What's new

ICJ rejects India’s plea for acquittal, repatriation of Kulbhushan - Updates, News & Discussion

Ok counslor mil ker usko punar janam de de bhai hahah

Bhai, uski maut to pakki hai.
Ussay to punar Janam hi Lena padega.
That’s guaranteed.
But for India, this is a way to spin the story. And we will. Trust me.
 
. . .
coz india thought it could throw the case out
Plus this whole fiasco proved that KJ had officially endorsed fake passports....to go to Pakistan (as per his conviction to participate in terrorist activities) and hence, the link that india officially allows it = exporting terrorism by state proven!

This is your extrapolation of the judgement. Stick to what is being said by the ICJ.
 
. .
Case will be reviewed and more severe punishment is expected to a terrorist/terrorism planner/terrorism mastermind/terrorist handler.
 
.
It is all about interpretation. If the article state specifically its limitations, then yes the court would have agreed with our position. But did this article clearly states its limitations ?
I have only read the article not its limitations...so I am not absolutely sure how our counselors tried to sell it
 
.
Ok review and death sentense again hahaha

i think we should keep him alive, every time Indians see him in our jails they will burn their Arses ..they already accepted him to be a " Innocent Indian " , and their govt can not jack sh!t about anything .
 
. .
This is your extrapolation of the judgement. Stick to what is being said by the ICJ.
ICJ agreed 2nd passport was officially his under disguised name....given to him by his state...you make whatever you want of it..otherwise he would have needed Persian counselor not indian :coffee:
 
. . .
so is there a double tax treaty with iran and supa pawa, otherwise we can make him to pay his taxes for the services rendered in Pakistan?

No idea. Iran is biraadar mulk of Pakistan.

We are talking about international law :sick: <== imitating my 3 years old nephew.

why trust our ability to exploit and not our ability to side with the truth?
 
.
An international court has ordered Pakistan to review the death penalty given to a retired Indian Navy officer whom it has accused of spying.

Pakistan has violated international law by denying India consular access to Kulbhushan Jadhav, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ruled.

The rulings of the ICJ are binding but it has no power to enforce them.

Kulbhushan Jadhav was arrested in Pakistan in March 2016, and sentenced to death the following year.

Pakistan, the court ruled, had failed to inform Mr Jadhav of his rights, and "deprived the Republic of India of the right to communicate with and have access to [him], to visit him in detention and to arrange for his legal representation".

"A continued stay of execution constitutes an indispensible condition for the effective review and reconsideration of the conviction and sentence of Mr Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav," it added.

Indian government told AFP the ruling was "a complete victory", adding: "This opens up the possibility of consular access and a retrial in a civilian court."

Wednesday's verdict is likely to fuel tensions between the nuclear powers.

India and Pakistan were on the brink of war in February over the disputed territory of Kashmir.

The neighbours have a long history of diplomatic spats and Delhi and Islamabad often accuse each other of sending spies into their territories.

What are the allegations?
The case of Kulbhushan Jadhav has been a thorny issue since his arrest three years ago.

Pakistan said it had detained him in the restive province of Balochistan, home to a separatist insurgency that it accuses India of backing. India said he was kidnapped in Iran, which borders the province, where he was doing business.

_99356948_jadhavglass.jpg
Image copyrightPAKISTAN FOREIGN MINISTRY
Image captionKulbushan Jadhav's mother and wife were allowed to meet him in December 2017
Shortly after his arrest, the Pakistani authorities released a video in which he was shown admitting involvement in spying.

India has always questioned the alleged confession, saying that it was extracted under duress.

In April 2017, Pakistan said he had been convicted in a military court of espionage and terrorism and sentenced to death. India then filed a case with the ICJ, which ordered Pakistan not to execute him until the case was heard and a decision reached.


_105894347_grey_line-nc.png

While India said that Pakistan violated the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations by denying access to Mr Jadhav, Pakistan argued he was not entitled to consular access because he is a spy who illegally entered the country in order to create "unrest and instability".

The ICJ was set up in 1945 to rule on disputes between nations in accordance with international law.

The last time India and Pakistan took a dispute to the court was in 1999 when Islamabad protested against India's downing of a Pakistani navy plane that killed 16 people.

The court decided that it had no jurisdiction to rule in the dispute and closed the case.


thread already running, why open a new one?
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom