ashok321
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2010
- Messages
- 17,942
- Reaction score
- 4
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He also named I think more than 12 people who's list Pakistan had handed over to India for provision of information. India never replied.
New Recruit
1) World even doesn't buy your idea of exposing Pakistan. Though these things are discussed and talked behind doors. No one will take India's or Pakistan name directly against each other but fact of the matter is, both nations do feel international pressure. Now going with your logic, Pakistan would had easily taken him out at first place had we knew that nothing will buy Pakistani side of the story.
2) India has not violated IWT as of now. They are required to use 11% of India river which they have not utilized yet hence World Bank most of the times have dismissed Pakistani concerns. The moment India goes beyond 11% than there will be all different ball game. Pakistan deliberately takes up everything to world bank just to keep Indian in check.
3) India has went to ICJ because of your stupid, troll and immense propagandist media pressure. Sushma was forced to call him as nation's son just because of your explosive media.
4. This Pakistani habit of crying Kashmir in world forums will be dented , once you shy away from following any UN body orders
It won't since we never shy away from UN body. See if that would had been the case, we could had simply said No to this ICJ case yet you saw our representative in the court today.
How that makes someone a " rondos "Means you Indians are rondoos in every aspect
jk
Needless to say that the Stay Order is in placeThose confident Indian posters who were congratulating aunty Sushma for victory of their made up stay order seem to have gone all quiet now not even showing their face on this thread.
How that makes someone a " rondos "
Your attorney didn't know how to utilise the precious 90 minutes allotted to your country.
He didn't have a back-up plan when ICJ refused to accept your FAKE video as evidence.
Your attorney curtailed his speech and It clearly showed that their team is sadly ill prepared.
Pakistan needs to be better prepared than what she has shown to the world.
Needless to say that the Stay Order is in place
If you have any doubts then, GO AHEAD and hang KbY
And SAY GOODBYE to IWT
1. So you confer that Pakistan has nothing to gain , contrary to what your very first post was.
2. Lol , there are no IFS and BUTS scenario , even beyond that Pakistans on PDF really need to understand the IWT and how India can manipulate each term without showing apparent violations.
3. Nationalistist point , far from diplomatic protocols and reality.
4. So what is the outcome to your argument , refer 3 similar cases in the past in icj on similar subjects for an objective understanding.
So you will follow what ICJ rules correct ? Let's see . What if you don't , will it not negate your argument in totality.
Also answer this what about your propaganda media over last few days who kept citing that ICJ has no jurisdiction, why didn't your pleader fight that , what understanding does this make of your propaganda media on similar subjects.
you mean terrorist commander YadavLook, it seems quite useless to discuss with you so I rest my cause. Fact of the matter is, by going into ICJ, India has opened a window for Pakistan to involve third party in their bi-lateral issues moving forward. As far as your little commander, KY is concerned, he was inconsequential, the day he was caught.
How that makes someone a " rondos "
Your attorney didn't know how to utilise the precious 90 minutes allotted to your country.
He didn't have a back-up plan when ICJ refused to accept your FAKE video as evidence.
Your attorney curtailed his speech and It clearly showed that their team is sadly ill prepared.
Pakistan needs to be better prepared than what she has shown to the world.
Look, it seems quite useless to discuss with you so I rest my cause. Fact of the matter is, by going into ICJ, India has opened a window for Pakistan to involve third party in their bi-lateral issues moving forward. As far as your little commander, KY is concerned, he was inconsequential, the day he was caught.
As if ICJ is an authority to decide competency of the court? Whether India accepts or not, the court awarded Yadav death sentence is a competent court.
these logics are good for pdf only. i am already thinking about the humiliation when pak will lose the case. the indians are good in courts even if they are criminals as in this case . the international community is with them . the paksitanis defending the case are going to prove their incompetence . the govt of pak would love if pak loses the case as kalbhushan was sentenced to death in a military court so it will the PA chief who will face the ultimate embarrassment . as far as the honor of the country is concerned who really cares. all they care about their own interests.
nawaz would love to see kalbhushan released and handed over to india.
we will pal. and if we do be a man and delete your account on PDF
tell then do us all a favour and stop wasting our time sprouting shit on our forum.
not wanted or welcomed here, go back to your hell hole called India
Pakistani lawyer explained and counter every argument of India clean and clear unlike Indian lawyer who blabber for more than specified time. He was not even clearly understood for Hinglish and the judge had mention it.