What's new

IAF losing edge over PAF:Military Intelligence.

Status
Not open for further replies.
JF17 is a good plane.....yes; possibly is.

JF17 is a super-duper unmatched or invincible plane.........not TRUE (period).



Insecurities............about what?



How do you know all that? We are yet to decide the brand of our 126 planes; and you still know that JF17 can beat all of them plus some 180-200 SU-30 MKI plus 69 Mig-29 plus 51 Mirage 2000.....................Astrology........I believe.




You had flown Sabre; so you know what the Eurofighter, Rafle, or Gripen are capable of..........right?

I am a bit confused..........can you please explain - JF17 is so great of a plane, but you still consider F16 (even block 15) your best fighter........why?

Indians what ever we will tell you about our Plane JF-17 you are not going to belive it because of lack of brains so only thing to prove is the WAR so we will se in war weather JF-17 is a good plane or not
 
Indians what ever we are going to tell you about JF-17 you are not going to belive it because of your deaf and dumb promblem so only thing which can prove JF-17 plane a good one or a bad one is WAR so what we should do is wait for it
 
sir our engineers were also involved in the same numbers as of chinees we always call it joint project but mainly developed by looking forward the needs of Pakistan Airforce

Yes brother; it was created for the PAF only...........but by China. Pakistan's main contribution was - MONEY. You cannot call it a plane made by you with the help of Chinese brothers like your countryman claimed. But China say claim that they created it with some help/money from Pakistan.

aks18 said:
yes we made this super duper air craft serving better than ur tejay we made it with help of our chinese brothers.

and yes dont compare TEJAS with JF-17 because JF-17 is father of TEJAS wo kia hay na kay baap lagta hay

WRONG.............Baap pahle aata hai; and you all know that Tejas project is there since mid-80s.

aks18 said:
we didnt wasted money and time like u guys did with ur arjunk n tejas; which are still dreaming to become part of IAF from last 30 years :( .

So, Tejas is father and JF17 is the son. Yes; they are similar in capabilities......no doubt which is obvious. There is say in Inda - बाप पे पूत, मालिक पे घोड़ा; ज़्यादा नहीं तो थोड़ा थोड़ा
 
I would advise all our respectable members here not to take that bate........let the troll jump around a little and then settle out of fatigue......Idiocy deserves ignorance not attention.

Righto.........YOU ARE IGNORED. HAPPY?:devil:
 
:hitwall:

Self made things = Foreign design, foreign engine, foreign avionics, foreign weaponary, foreign radar..................SELF ASSEMBLED is the right word.



WOW..................kya baat hai. Even your Chinese brothers won't agree with you. Claiming someone's creation as own is as bad as steeling. You are only assembling/manufacturing it. THIS IS A CREATION OF CHINA..............NOT OF PAKISTAN. Pakistan only arranged money and things which either cannot be made by both countries or not accepted by PAF due to quality or other things. We all know how good you are as a country in producing something. :devil:



Yes. You don't waste money and time, and just steal. :chilli:

Please don't compare Tejas and JF. JF17 and Tejas are same in specifications; but not in origin.

JF is "Kahin ki Eent, kahi ka Roda, Bhanumathi ne Kunba Joda" whereas Tejas is a self-made plane, which was started from scratch.

Good things take time to happen. Eurofighter program started in 1983; Gripen in 1982, Dassault Rafale in 1982-82, and F22 in 1986. So if the countries with rich past experience can take time in developing new fighter jet, then country like India without such experience will obviuosly take more time.



Success Comes To Those Who Dare To Dream............not to them who buy/borrow/steal them. :bunny:


lol everything u guys going to use in tejas is from different countries around the world at least our plane is not dependent on other countries, we have great relation with our brother nation china .. lol u comparing euro fighters with tejas :cheesy: tell me how much tejas are comparable to euro fighter and rafales ???? if ur teja is that much gud fighter why u guys buying new air crafts why not to make tejas more gud fighter :azn: ,,, ok we have stole technology from other countries so whats wrong ??? main work of the war machine is to destroy enemy and our machines can do this job ;)

i have read sum where tejas are going to have MLU now :lol: thats really amazing fighter before induction its going to have MLU
 
Indians what ever we will tell you about ourPlane JF-17 you are not going to belive it because of lack of brains so only thing to prove is the WAR so we will se in war weather JF-17 is a good plane or not

lol hahaah our seriously plane made by china using a russian engine :rofl:

well this is not the topic here so bye bye
 
aks18 and others fighting this not a tejas vs jf 17 thread
 
Ninja - Samurai - Sumo

Tejas - MMRCA - Su30 MKI

@ above post
3.gif
 
What has happened to this thread? Will the Indian members be happy if we concede that nothing has changed over the last 10 years? The Pakistani members are actin as if we are about to establish all out dominance over the IAF.
These things are cyclical, as air forces acquire new equipment, it changes the dynamics of scenario. Naturally then, there will be periods where the gap will close and other times that it will expand.
None the less, many members assume the edge the IAF developed over the 90s, due to our lost decade has always been the status quo. Instead the last 10 years are a better example of the future of the IAF-PAF balance for the medium term. The Indians will continue to acquire expensive equipment and we will counter with lower cost alternatives to deny air superiority.
 
Any more idiotic claims by some jealous folks(which have been rebuffed many posts back)and attempts to turn this into a vs thread is inviting trouble.
 
Any more idiotic claims by some jealous folks(which have been rebuffed many posts back)and attempts to turn this into a vs thread is inviting trouble.

Mod, with due respect is this thread not a vs thread when people argue for / against the topic. What do you expect members to do other than compare in order to scrutinize the validity of the article ?
 
we already established that the report was just to jump start the mmrca deal.... frankly i'm fed up of these vs threads without any actual ''objective and a bit informative'' discussion--- just seeing the pointless oneliners moving in a vicious circle takes us no where
 
I guess,think military intelligence report made the MoD shortlist Ef and Rafale in time.....

eventhough i think PAF is closeing the tech gap very fast
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom