Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is what "real Pantagon official "says
https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&s...AxAB&usg=AOvVaw16-tIokh_ZrR0NPF1frSy1&cf=1
FP magazine has more credibility than IAF..
From balakot strikes to downing f16. IAF credibility has gone to 0. Its good to see even some Indians are questioning them. As far as International media is concerned, well never mind. Ridiculed and trolled at fullest, even from their strategic allies aka US.
Intahai Jahilana bat karte hain Indians.Quoting Indian links and saying what real pentagon official says.... Absolute Bs....Agaya daikhta ja....IAF 4 missiles ko tou convienetly ignore kar gai ab jab lashain dikhain gai tou phir bharat mata jagay gi.....This is what "real Pantagon official "says
https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&s...AxAB&usg=AOvVaw16-tIokh_ZrR0NPF1frSy1&cf=1
Take it easy man. It was all in good humor.Maps and radar images....
You are talking out of your ***...just like your pm and air chief..
I dont know if you are sorry or not, but if your parents read all the crap that you typed, they will be sorry that they had a hand in bringing you in this world.
Adios.... Gay Hind
Yes, when you claim Su30 kill they do know about counter measures. They don't know anything about counter measures when they say they hit the F-16.Why is it that every Indian posting regarding this topic posts Indian links? Like Indian sources can be unbiased.
Does the IAF know what chaffs are by any chance?
No, it is not, especially when quoting unnamed sources.
the female that called lara is a Pentagon corespondent for foreign policy, her twitter account already posted in different thread and that stated she is a Pentagon corespondent @BrOkEn HeArTA magzine is not a spokesperson of US.
And tell me how many Pentagon corespondent for foreign policy @BrOkEn HeArTThis is what "real Pantagon official "says
https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&s...AxAB&usg=AOvVaw16-tIokh_ZrR0NPF1frSy1&cf=1
yes she is already posted in different thread and her account clearly states that she is Pentagon corespondent @OsirisNo, it is not, especially when quoting unnamed sources.
What a real official you have @BrOkEn HeArT that doesn't refer his name for the article, so might be consider as a UNNAMED Officials @BrOkEn HeArT enjoy:This is what "real Pantagon official "says
https://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&s...AxAB&usg=AOvVaw16-tIokh_ZrR0NPF1frSy1&cf=1
they have too much butthurt bro @GumNaam
and where the official's name in the article @Sal12Again this is Indian source.