IAF deploys fighters near Pak border

[Hulk]

Four consecutive losses thats a bit generous. 71 india could claim that. 65 was a draw, and 48 was a good win for a Pakistan as we gained territroy i-e Azad Kashmir and India has to run to the UN to save itself from incurring more losses.
As Brahmos (being invincible) is concerned, it has shorter range compared to Babur. Is not yet integrated into any Indian fighters, and can be countered by AAA. Its best suited for the Naval role. But I will leave that as this is airforce thread.

48 u attacked Kashmir and they asked for help, u got 1/3rd and we got 2/3rd how is that your victory?

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

48 u attacked Kashmir and they asked for help, u got 1/3rd and we got 2/3rd how is that your victory?

WRONG..........We withdrew when Nehru ran to UN asking for a ceasefire and promising refrendum?our forces had at the time captured LADAKH.

Dont distaurt history.

 

[aks]

48 u attacked Kashmir and they asked for help, u got 1/3rd and we got 2/3rd how is that your victory?

if its was not victory why ur govt sum time claims for whole kashmir including azad kashmir

 

[Super Falcon]

welll it was indian habbit when they losse they cry and go to UN and than when we retreat they say india won the war it is bullshit

 

[gurjot]

if speed is everything then y u guys going for sub sonic cruise missiles which we already have from last 5 years

answer is payload.....

 

[nangyale]

And who told China and India are going for war ?? No one is fool enough out of these 2 countries who will go in war without any big agenda which cant be solved thru conversation. Both the countrie's economy is booming and they are busy in modernisation of their armed forces as well as infrastructure of the country.

If you cant dare to face the Falcurm and Flanker, then its good. Atleast something is learned from past wars.BTW there is no real possibility of war with neither Pak nor with China.
Sit tight and donot put rubbish and baseless remarks of ur own.

Ofcourse with India, China and Pakistan all armed with nukes no one is going to war. Atleast we all hop that saner head prevail and there are no wars. With economy booming or not more wars are not what we require in this region.
As far the second part of your post. there is no problem of daring or not. Actually I think its foolish for India to deploy there major assests closer to the border as that make them easier targets. Another lesson that India should have learnt from past experience but obviously didnt.

 

[Super Falcon]

yes and in payload we already have beaten you too and question is that you 80 percent missile tests are failure 80 percent of indian missiles are un operational said by your own ministry of defence and indian media no indian missile is capable to any pakistani missile and other question is cruise missile which pakistan has it is stelath hard to detect and hard to shoot down as your brhamos lacks this our bullistic misssiles can carry multiple warheads no indian misssile is capable

 

[Indian-Devil]

wel no f 16 has stationed near indian border even our new F 16 are going in jacomabad base well and than indian says that pakistan is a one who is creating probleums in region when india buys trilllions of dollars of weapons they dont have any probleum when pakistan buys even a bullet whole indian govt and media cries so it is a fact india never want to have a peace with pakistan and this peace is just a drama

You are mixing 2 different issues.
First one, India is buying Billions of dollors of weapon, because it has money to spend and it has its futuristic requirements. India is not only surrounded by Pakistan, there are many more borders it has to protect. And India has to incrase its fire power to counter other adversaries as well.
If India has to induct over 250 advanced jet, should they ask neighbours countries, that where should we deploy them ?? where you donot have any problems?
Or should India wait for these jets deployment on borders, till its old adversory is also equipped with something in same category that is deployed on border?

Second one for peace. Pls check the history who started wars, which happened after Independance, in past with neighbour country ? Who always started peace talk with neighbour country and what they got in response ??? As long as protest is concerned, Other countries can also try the same way when India is inducting something in its arsenal. If protest can add 1% in scrapping some contract or even delaying that contract, its a win win condition. But someone should be in condition to do that, thats a requirement for protest.

 

[Hulk]

WRONG..........We withdrew when Nehru ran to UN asking for a ceasefire and promising refrendum?our forces had at the time captured LADAKH.

Dont distaurt history.

Man you are taking me offtopic but do not know if I should congratulate you for bravery or ...
If you could leave LADHAK to baki kyoun rakh liya waise tumhara signature bahoot hi funny hai, abhi tak hansi aa rahi hai.

 

[Dark Angel]

yes and in payload we already have beaten you too and question is that you 80 percent missile tests are failure 80 percent of indian missiles are un operational said by your own ministry of defence and indian media no indian missile is capable to any pakistani missile and other question is cruise missile which pakistan has it is stelath hard to detect and hard to shoot down as your brhamos lacks this our bullistic misssiles can carry multiple warheads no indian misssile is capable

Agni II is operational and is capable of hitting any city in pakistan

Keep dreaming and we will be busy making Agni 5 and further

 

[MastanKhan]

Could u elborate

Hi,

Thanks for asking---if you had read pAF air chiefs article why pak purchased F 16 in the 80's would answer what I stated.

If india would have chosen to destroy pak's nuclear capabilities----pak had no way of stopping that to happen by intercepting the intruders---only for ground to air missiles---the only response was tit for tat.

Now india has reversed the scenario and given pak and easy target---.

In pak india scenario here what happens many a time----an indian plane will be coming from the opposite side---the pak technicians are looking at it at the radar----people are getting extremely nervous---then at the very last moment it make a 90 degree turn and go parallel to the border---paf would supposedly do the same as well---.

Now if the planes decide to fly right across the border over lahore---it is just a flick of an eye---coming from kasmir towards islamabad is hardly two minutes to strike.

In this time neither can my pilots nor can your pilots tighten up their laces---put on the helmets get to an air plane strap them up start the engines and take off---it all takes time---.

Now being so close to the border-----the paf does not need to sacrifice any of its hig end whatevr planes----they can use the F 7 pg's---the A 5 if still in existence and the Mirages---.

Specially planes like the su 30 who have very long legs---ie that they can fly for a long time---there is no reason for them to be a shoe throwing distance away from the opponent and same is true for the mig 29's---At 150 to 200 miles within their borders they can do the same job very well----keep their integrity and keep the enemy from attacking them---it is the critical time when the enemy aircraft can cross over your border to the target that is of utmost importance.

Pakistan has no choice---because it has no depth as compared to india---iaf has all the choices---regardless of what measures you take---any base within 30 to 50 miles will be devasted in the first strikes---.

Now pre-emtive and cold start can work both ways in this case---. Regardless of what the defences are like----the lack of reaction time is the biggest enemy over here.

Pakistan already a target---no ifs and buts about it----but with these bases----india has given pakistan a very juicy option---the have deployed the pride of their air force within a spitting distance and if something happens, they can't cry foul.

Bottomline---not the best choice---why make your top birds vulnerable to enemy strike.

 

[gurjot]

yes and in payload we already have beaten you too and question is that you 80 percent missile tests are failure 80 percent of indian missiles are un operational said by your own ministry of defence and indian media no indian missile is capable to any pakistani missile and other question is cruise missile which pakistan has it is stelath hard to detect and hard to shoot down as your brhamos lacks this our bullistic misssiles can carry multiple warheads no indian misssile is capable

jaisi aap ki marji,if u want to understand it's ok,if not ,india will not loose anything.u r exactly right that no indian missile is working.now be happy okkkkkkkk

 

[Areesh]

Agni II is operational and is capable of hitting any city in pakistan

Keep dreaming and we will be busy making Agni 5 and further

Good to hear the Agni II is operational. Anyways you also keep dreaming because we might be going towards future projects of our missiles.

In fact I still believe we don't need these missiles to hit IAF bases. Our MRL's will do the job for us.

 

[gurjot]

Good to hear the Agni II is operational. Anyways you also keep dreaming because we might be going towards future projects of our missiles.

In fact I still believe we don't need these missiles to hit IAF bases. Our MRL's will do the job for us.

u said wat i wanted to say,if ur mrl's can do,then our rocket launchers can do this job

 

[nangyale]

You are mixing 2 different issues.
First one, India is buying Trillions of dollors of weapon, because it has money to spend and it has its futuristic requirements. India is not only surrounded by Pakistan, there are many more borders it has to protect. And India has to incrase its fire power to counter other adversaries as well.
If India has to induct over 250 advanced jet, should they ask neighbours countries, that where should we deploy them ?? where you donot have any problems?
Or should India wait for these jets deployment on borders, till its old adversory is also equipped with something in same category that is deployed on border?

Second one for peace. Pls check the history who started wars, which happened after Independance, in past with neighbour country ? Who always started peace talk with neighbour country and what they got in response ??? As long as protest is concerned, Other countries can also try the same way when India is inducting something in its arsenal. If protest can add 1% in scrapping some contract or even delaying that contract, its a win win condition. But someone should be in condition to do that, thats a requirement for protest.

Trillions of dollars. wow I am scared. You guys have an even bigger military budget than the US. Actually the whole US defence budget is somewhere in the mid 600s billion. Now if you guys are buying a trillion dollar of weapons that really is something.
Now your jokes aside. Pakistan didnt started any wars with India, Pakistan only responded to the situation which was thrust upon it.
Protests are different but what India indulges in is just pathetic. There is normally a balance to be struck, you can go and protest to the contractors try and stop the deal from going through, but when you fail then you take a dignified position. In the case of India if it fails in getting its desired goal, it starts to cry, only making itself looking cheap and pathetic, rather the rising power it dreams of becoming.