MilSpec
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2011
- Messages
- 12,931
- Reaction score
- 38
- Country
- Location
PAF in it's current capabilities has more than enough assets to counter any IAF initiatives with it's current strength. I have always maintained, high numbers of LCA mk2's in next six to eight years is the only way to ensure utilize the maximum potential of Mki, M2K an m29's along with limitde nos of Rafales which will come into picture in that time frame...
Until higher numbers of planned IAF assets are operational OR there is introduction of substantial stealth platforms in IAF, i ont see that balance changing in favor of IAF...
The advantage again in numbers is strategic not tactical... Paf with lower numbers can prove numerically superior to an IAF strike package in tactical engagement. 150 JF17 and 272 MKI doesn't mean they wil go head to head all at once.... Thus numbers in tactical scenario for limite engagement doesn't mean anything unless both parties go all chips in....
Also bearing in mind higher numbers and better technology of IAF means marginal advantage in air combat not the entire conflict, where Nuclear umbrella and ballistic.cruise missile provide substantial risk mitigation for pakistan....
Until higher numbers of planned IAF assets are operational OR there is introduction of substantial stealth platforms in IAF, i ont see that balance changing in favor of IAF...
The advantage again in numbers is strategic not tactical... Paf with lower numbers can prove numerically superior to an IAF strike package in tactical engagement. 150 JF17 and 272 MKI doesn't mean they wil go head to head all at once.... Thus numbers in tactical scenario for limite engagement doesn't mean anything unless both parties go all chips in....
Also bearing in mind higher numbers and better technology of IAF means marginal advantage in air combat not the entire conflict, where Nuclear umbrella and ballistic.cruise missile provide substantial risk mitigation for pakistan....