What's new

IAF 400-strong fleet can strike Pakistan in as little as 15 minutes

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
Its a wrong and funny article

Reason

1) First India dont have 400 4th n 4.5th generation Aircrafts.
4th n 4.5th gene AC's in Inidan inventory are
~ 130 SU 30
~ 70 Mig 29
~ 45 Mirage 2K
___________
Now thats approx 245

2) If India bring all advance 245 AC's towards PAKISTAN border then who will handle thier Airspace from China Border.

3) History proven that PAF response time is very sharp, thats proven right after Mumbai Attacks when IAF attempted twice to come close to the border and both time IAF AC's were warned and locked.

4)We also remember that PAKISTAN Nucklear strike units were activated after Mumbai attacks and it was also said (Shah Mohammad Qureshi, Asif Zardari and COAS) that if India hav any adventure in thier mind then the severe reposne (Nuke Strikes) time would be less then 10 mins.

_________________________
There r many other logical things that can prove that India cant attempt to attack or can ever attempt surgical stirke in that short period. :)
 
.
Look, an MKI positioned at Srinagar airbase can reach many areas in Pakistan in less than 5 mins (forget 15 mins) but it all depends what is the nature of engagement.

In a full out war, there will be multiple fronts with many types of aircraft being involved. In a short cross border strike, MKI's and Fulcrums can carry out near border strikes, there is no need for India to use 400 planes for this purpose.

If a deep strike is req, Jaguars will complement the MKI's. But again it depends on the level of engagement.
 
.
Ermm okay can anyone answer me this... IAF can Strike (oooohhh) Pakistan within 15 minutes... Yet it has taken them 63+ years to carry it out and still counting? One word to describe their inaction.

Hell, I say IAF can carry out a strike in 15 seconds... Sure go ahead, be my guest (and my breakfast, lunch or dinner too... depending on the time you get the balls to carry out that attack)

Till then I am off to sleep, cuz PAF is wide awake
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
^Carrying out a military strike is a political decision. The military says it is ready but the government has to be brave enough to simultaneously open a diplomatic front against Pakistan.

And secondly, why would India carry out a military strike if she feels that she is getting things done the diplomatic way and thru backdoor channels.

Remember in politics, the real decisions happen behind the doors and the outside public hardly get a whisper.

SO its not about striking Pakistan, its about getting things done, if it can be done diplomatically then there is no need for military intervention.

Simple!
 
. .

Yes, I have read your points, nicely written but its only from military POV.

See, India is not obsessed with military strikes, its all about getting things done, militarily or diplomatically.

ANd I would like to ask a question:-

IS it impossible diplomatically to achieve of what an intended military strike can achieve?
 
. .
This article reeks of a strong American bias. Nonetheless, it is true. IAF over the years has become a far more potent force than the PAF can ever hope to be.

Also, lol @ the Pakistanis who think nukes will be used in case of surgical strikes :rofl:

Lol At those stupid members who think surgical strikes of India won't turn into full scale war.
 
.
.
Look, an MKI positioned at Srinagar airbase can reach many areas in Pakistan in less than 5 mins (forget 15 mins) but it all depends what is the nature of engagement.

In a full out war, there will be multiple fronts with many types of aircraft being involved. In a short cross border strike, MKI's and Fulcrums can carry out near border strikes, there is no need for India to use 400 planes for this purpose.

If a deep strike is req, Jaguars will complement the MKI's. But again it depends on the level of engagement.

you would know what such a close positioning will expose them to continous monitoring and PAF will be alerted as soon as any suspecious activity happens over there. and secondly Srinagar will not be a good choice to operate MKI as it is near so in range of Stand off strike
 
.
15mins and everybody in Pak is sleeping . I will repeat it again IAF cannot take such a huge risk , if they could they would have done that after Mumbai attacks. Deep down IAF knows that if any IAF plane goes inside Pak territory now it will not return back home . So any such operation will be a suicide mission for the pilots. Pakistan is not only made up of its air force dears but also there is a very thick SAM (i love this word) cover ...having been trained in an air force establishment i will give u a clue ... looks might be deceptive.
 
.
common man what we have to lose? are you guys wanna see delhi bombay as a desert? its only a words war. IAF surgical strike mean full scale war and if pakistan lose full scale war there will be last punch which means lose for both sides.
 
. .
common man what we have to lose? are you guys wanna see delhi bombay as a desert? its only a words war. IAF surgical strike mean full scale war and if pakistan lose full scale war there will be last punch which means lose for both sides.


Yes In event of full scale war ...If pakistan loses....their last choice will be nukes.....Yes you may nuke us with one or two.....pakistan may destroy delhi , bombay , kolkata
... But believe me in such event.... pakistan should never underestimate India.....

yes you make nuke us with one or two nukes .....But When We Retaliate , There Will Be No Pakistan
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom