You still didn't get it. The issue is were you frisked at airport because of your religion ?
Forget about actors. OK, I agree with you. There has been actors frisked. May be due to drugs or custom theft. But not for religion.
Do you think there is no difference between ex-President of India and you ? Don't you think frisking APJ ABdul Kalam just because he is a Muslim, was disrespect of India.
The issue is Hindus, Christians Jews are not taken aside on basis of Religion, why Muslims ? Aren't you doing the same generalization and discrimination based on prejudice and people'e opinion that you hate.
People treated you badly because of their prejudice, perception about brown color people.
WoW. Is it rocket science ?
Yes, it does appear to be a rocket science - for you.
You are running your argument on the presumption that Abdul Kalam was frisked at the airport because of his religion. No, he was not!
Neither was Shahrukh Khan, nor was Irrfan Khan.
He was checked because his name matched with someone's name in their database who was involved in terrorism. What makes you think there can be anything in the US laws even remotely suggesting discrimination based on religion?
To help you understand this rocket science, here are two instances... compare them, and please think!
1. Ted Kennedy - the senior most member of the senate - got stopped at the airport and was held by the airport security and eventually missed his flight - because there was a name of a terrorist in the database that matched his.
Points to consider -
a. Was Kennedy a Muslim? No.
b. Was he discriminated against because he was a Roman Catholic? No.
c. Did the airport officials not know they could lose their jobs at his slightest effort? Yes, they did.
d. Was any apology issued? None.
2. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam - ex president of India - gets stopped at the last moment, to have his shoe checked.
a. Was he discriminated because of his religion? Same as with Ted Kennedy.
b. Was an apology issued immediately afterwards? Yes, the ambassador delivered it in person.
c. Did the airport officials get fired? Yes, within two weeks.
---------------------
In India, you be a totally corrupt local politician, and see if anyone dares stop you anywhere, even if you are brazenly engaging in kabootarbazi. In the states, they either resign, or are forced to resign.
Just think of it, US went to war with two countries over one incident. Now, say, after listening to your arguments and all the ruckus in the media, Americans get lax at checking Indian travelers (esp Muslims), and then someone from Indian Mujaheddin slips in takes down a plane. Who should be held responsible for the loss of life? People like you who allowed them a window, or the Americans who will be loathed to no end for being respectful toward Indians?
When it comes to the moral high ground, you should consider the implications and not even think of this "tit for tat" approach you have been advocating so vigorously.
I cannot comprehend on what values are you defending the Indian position here.