Dustom999
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2020
- Messages
- 264
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
I am no expert, nor really up to date with whats going on with technical capabilities of various forces across the globe.There was an interesting exchange on the subject in some other thread. @Dustom999, why don't you join in, if you are so inclined, and explain about the peculiarities of high altitude operations?
There is something very peculiar about that topography.
In the east, it is the exact mirror image of India on a plateau facing Pakistan on a lower level, with disputed ravines and ridges and high mountain ranges in between. It is tempting to think that, except for militants coming in, the Indian Army can adopt a mirror image of the tactics used against it in the Kashmir area.
MOST of Tibet is quite unlikely the Galwan River topography; it is flat plateau, interspersed by rough country. Or perhaps Galwan River magnified a thousand times - horizontally.
Haven't even read the previous discussion in here, from what i gather, with very limited reading, much discussed need of 6:1 ratios or sometimes even 10:1 ratio of offensive force, limits to pincers in mountains, security of flanks and tactics there to, being discussed in various forums ( here as well as others) are so 1980 things.
Limitations that logistics, communications, delivery etal faced pre 2000, have changed drastically. Not that now these aren't problems anymore, however nature of them has changed with influxes of technology.
Battlefield management assisted by AI is the thing of today and sway the outcome towards better manager.
Both India and china (army) are still defensive forces and both are yet not confident in their offensive powers.
However Both possess defensive clutches to inflict very heavy cost of men and materials to the aggressor, to bring the parties to table for talks. Discounting use of WMDs,I am only talking about conventional operations in conflict zone.
China PLA has, in last decade or two managed to go into overdrive and is now becoming a centrally controlled system driven force. With whole theater being digitally available on a SAP like system for logistics, movement and sharing of intelligence in real time with relevant teams.
They have been able to cut the size of sheer manpower and still improve lethality.
India is still atleast a decade behind on information front and still fighting very much like decade of 1980 ( Ofcourse with improved weapons and information) but missing digotalsystem organised command and control.
As far as terrain on present border of J&K, specially towards china, i believe atleast on present LaC is pretty much similar, presents same challenges at cross over points. China
has advantages of plains of Tibet where they can regroup, stage defence, setup nodes in case of a long ongoing war with India.
India Ofcourse will counter with reducing troop density at any one specific area, Hit battalion sized targets,inflict pain
and retreat to next points of ambush. Letting them in towards pre determined traps.
A trapped force, cut-off from rear and not able to advance at speeds as desired makes commanders nervous.
Ofcourse planning and area denial to Chinese air force will be critical for any of this to be successful.