What's new

Huawei may handle Airtel's 4G rollout in Delhi, Mumbai

Let's say you have service level agreements - for delivering a product or service on time and the sum involves billions of $ - in case of a dispute, you are forced to go to court - where do you think there is more chance you getting a fair trial - if your supplier is Ericsson in a Stockholm court or if your supplier is Huawei in a Beijing court?

LOL at cave man how about taking the head of bohpaL IN AMERICAN COURT FIRST

Anger in India over Bhopal disaster verdicts

"Shame On India" headlined the tabloid Mail Today, while the front page of The Times of India read: "Justice Delayed, Denied."

Anger in India over Bhopal disaster verdicts

do something about that first white asss kisser
 
i didnt realise standup comedians can be the authority on geneva conventions :tup:

I bet you didn't realize mass murderers could be gracing currency bills either. China defies logic and rationale.

in matters of arbitrage between a domestic company [Nokia] & a foreign litigant [India], the verdict would invariably be biased in favor of the domestic party. You don't take up such matters in the domestic court - see what happened to Uninor in India
In such cases you're better off seeking International arbitrage, in which case it wouldn't matter whether you filing complaint against Nokia or ZTE.
In fact with a Caucasian heavy nature of such arbitration bodies, you'd have better chance of getting a verdict in your favor if the opposing party is a Han Chinese, than a Swede.

Any way you look at it going with the Chinese makes great sense, until the time an Indian CISCO comes up - a distant goal.

And pigs fly...
 
LOL at cave man how about taking the head of bohpaL IN AMERICAN COURT FIRST

Anger in India over Bhopal disaster verdicts

"Shame On India" headlined the tabloid Mail Today, while the front page of The Times of India read: "Justice Delayed, Denied."

Anger in India over Bhopal disaster verdicts

ado something about that first white asss kisser

Ah - these simple minded Chinese people comparing industrial disasters to service agreements. LOL. It is not as if Americans sent a plane - we capture the plane and then we release the pilot who not only violated our airspace but also shot down one of our pilots. Which self respecting country would do that? Oh wait - China did - the ultimate white @ss lickers....

true we don't kill Indians like white man do that really is defies logic and rationale

I don't understand gibberish. Try typing something comprehensible. Come on, you can do it!
 
Ah - these simple minded Chinese people comparing industrial disasters to service agreements. LOL. It is not as if Americans sent a plane - we capture the plane and then we release the pilot who not only violated our airspace but also shot down one of our pilots. Which self respecting country would do that? Oh wait - China did - the ultimate white @ss lickers....

LOL at fool aint you talking about fair trial ? where do you think there is more chance you getting a fair trial - if your supplier is Ericsson in a Stockholm court or if your supplier is Huawei in a Beijing court?man I am talking to an idiot

America bohpal Italian saliors lol they all got away with murders and this moron still think he can get a fair trial from the west
 
LOL at fool aint you talking about fair trial ? where do you think there is more chance you getting a fair trial - if your supplier is Ericsson in a Stockholm court or if your supplier is Huawei in a Beijing court?man I am talking to an idiot

America bohpal Italian saliors lol they all got away with murders and this moron still think he can get a fair trial from the west

Sigh! Still typing gibberish. Good try - come on - try again, once more. Am sure this time you will manage to make more sense.
 
true we don't kill Indians like white man do that really is defies logic and rationale

We don't kill chinese like japs did .... so what's new?

As for the whites "killing" indians about a 100 years ago, the prime minister of the same country expressed remose and paid tributes to the dead.

Parallelly the japs don't remorse the chinese killed, but keep visiting Yasukuni shrine.. while chinese keep jumping up and down blowing hot and cold.

Perhaps you would have preferred whites killing you, instead of japs.

Or perhaps you would have preferred being Indian, instead of chinese. :laugh:

sorry mate.. it's bad for you both ways.
 
We don't kill chinese like japs did .... so what's new?

As for the whites "killing" indians about a 100 years ago, the prime minister of the same country expressed remose and paid tributes to the dead.

Parallelly the japs don't remorse the chinese killed, but keep visiting Yasukuni shrine.. while chinese keep jumping up and down blowing hot and cold.

Perhaps you would have preferred whites killing you, instead of japs.

Or perhaps you would have preferred being Indian, instead of chinese. :laugh:

sorry mate.. it's bad for you both ways.

The Chinese are very good that - jumping up and down - they do have the Olympic trampoline medals to prove that point too.
 
The Chinese are very good that - jumping up and down - they do have the Olympic trampoline medals to prove that point too.

Indians are experts at kissing the white mans arse. So much so that a white woman rules your country :lol:

Regarding Olympics and medals.....win a gold medal first before an Indian mentions the word 'Olympics'.
 
We don't kill chinese like japs did .... so what's new?

As for the whites "killing" indians about a 100 years ago, the prime minister of the same country expressed remose and paid tributes to the dead.

Parallelly the japs don't remorse the chinese killed, but keep visiting Yasukuni shrine.. while chinese keep jumping up and down blowing hot and cold.

Perhaps you would have preferred whites killing you, instead of japs.

Or perhaps you would have preferred being Indian, instead of chinese. :laugh:

sorry mate.. it's bad for you both ways.

The whites used Indians as servants, and the worst part about it is that Indians loved it. They used Indians to do their donkey work for 300 years to further British colonialism. No race worships another race as much as Indians worshipping whites. That is why Indians are treated as a joke in the international community. Just look how Italy is making a mockery of your country.
 
The whites used Indians as servants, and the worst part about it is that Indians loved it. They used Indians to do their donkey work for 300 years to further British colonialism. No race worships another race as much as Indians worshipping whites. That is why Indians are treated as a joke in the international community. Just look how Italy is making a mockery of your country.

Btw.. who is "whites"?

The same "whites" ruled other whites in the current sole superpower, if you mean that british are "whites".

And if you are referring to british in India, even chinese confess.. compared to what Japanese did to china, the british were saints.

Indians disagree, off course... since the british never really had that kind of "power" in India .. compared to what Japs could do in china .. or Hitler could do in France and eastern Europe.

India was too large and big for british to do a "Nanking" on us.

The british army in India, was Indian.
The british "police" in India, was Indian.

Lesson:

(1) India is too big to be ruled by anyone "else" on earth.

(2) India is too big to be able to absorb, assimilate and dissolve foreigners, their culture, religion and still remain Indian.
 
KOLKATA: India's top telecom company ****** Airtel is likely towards ask China's Huawei to handle 4G network rollouts in the country's biggest data markets of Delhi and Mumbai, which were among the four regions where it acquired US chipmaker Qualcomm's wireless broadband permits last year, executives aware of the matter said.

Huawei may initially supply 6,000-odd base stations (BTSs) for the first wave of Airtel's high-speed wireless data services rollouts in Delhi and Mumbai. At current prices of roughly $25,000 or Rs 13.5 lakh per base station, the initial cost of rolling out 4G networks in both metros would be $150 million (Rs 810 crore approximately ). The final deal size could run in excess of $200 million (Rs 1,100 crore approximately) if Huawei is also asked to manage these networks.

This will be Airtel's first 4G network deal announcement after Gopal Vittal took charge as chief executive. ****** was the first Indian telco to launch fourth-generation services about a year ago and it had announced plans to widen its 4G footprint to 8 telecom zones after it acquired 49% in Qualcomm's wireless broadband entities in Delhi, Mumbai, Haryana and Kerala for Rs 924 crore. It had earlier shelled out Rs 3,314.36 crore for wireless broadband airwaves in Kolkata, Karnataka , Punjab and Maharashtra.

****** Airtel did not reply to ET's specific queries on whether it is buying gear from Huawei for expanding its 4G footprint to the country's biggest telecom zones. The Chinese vendor also did not respond to ET's email query on deal size and tenure. A top executive close to the talks, however, said ****** and Huawei were broadening their 4G engagement.

Huawei has supplied 4G networks and devices like dongles and customer premise equipment (CPE) to Airtel in Bangalore, and is likely to do the same in Delhi and Mumbai. Both companies have conducted trails of Huawei's Ascend P1 LTE smartphone, which is the first TD-LTE compatible 4G handset in India, although Airtel did not comment on whether it had finalised its pricing.

"Airtel has not placed purchase orders for 4G gear for potential Delhi and Mumbai rollouts as it is yet to take a call on whether it will have adequate customers to justify a fresh Rs 800 crore investment, given the poor traction of 4G in India in the absence of devices ecosystem and high data tariffs," said another executive who did not wish to be named.

Sector analysts claim investments in a greenfield rollout will be high since 4G airwaves in the 2300 MHz band offer limited coverage unlike frequencies in the 900 MHz, 1800 MHz or 700 MHz bands that more efficient and offer wider coverage.

Till date, ****** has launched 4G services only in Bangalore, Kolkata and Pune and has some 40,000-odd customers, although the company did not confirm this. There is no decision yet to immediately launch in Haryana or Kerala. "4G hasn't taken off since device and data tariffs remain high and Airtel is unlikely to see serious traction unless it launches in Delhi and Mumbai," says Ovum's principal telecoms analyst (consumer services), Shiv Putcha. Putcha expects Airtel to cherry pick launch zones as "its 4G spectrum holdings in key circles are largely strategic acquisitions, especially since India is not ready for 4G as we neither have the relevant content, the devices or the demand to drive wireless broadband services penetration" .

Source

Good news, it makes sense to have growing relationship with China.
 
LOL - hahahhahahaha - sure. The reason they will consider Huawei is because it is cheap - it is not as if Huawei has developed any ground breaking technology that we will have to rely on Chinese technology - hahahahaha - one thing to reverse engineer, quite another to actually develop and invent a product. The Chinese are simply incapable of doing that.

That's exactly what I'll say when I couldn't accept the fact.

Keep relying on the imports is all you can do, deal with it.

Storage upstart Huawei snatches NFS filer crown - Nothing fancy, but India has nothing this.

The Chinese are very good that - jumping up and down - they do have the Olympic trampoline medals to prove that point too.

Not to mention we have hundreds of medals more in other sports, where Indians can only watch with their mouths open :omghaha:
 
They are untrustworthy. Look at the way they violated the Geneva Convention by detaining the Italian ambassador! :angry:

cut the crap who detained the envoy??any link??
@topic let the people decide.if its liked by people then automatically it'll be a hit..besides airtel is not the only service provider in india we have other big players as well.. india is too big for airtel to handle alone.reliance bros may together venture the prg..
Reliance Communications' deal with Reliance Industries inevitable for 4G rollout: CLSA - Economic Times
 
LOL at cave man how about taking the head of bohpaL IN AMERICAN COURT FIRST

Anger in India over Bhopal disaster verdicts

"Shame On India" headlined the tabloid Mail Today, while the front page of The Times of India read: "Justice Delayed, Denied."

Anger in India over Bhopal disaster verdicts

do something about that first white asss kisser

KOLKATA: India's top telecom company ****** Airtel is likely to ask China's Huawei to handle 4G network rollouts in the country's biggest data markets of Delhi and Mumbai, which were among the four regions where it acquired US chipmaker Qualcomm's wireless broadband permits last year, executives aware of the matter said.

Huawei may initially supply 6,000-odd base stations (BTSs) for the first wave of Airtel's high-speed wireless data services rollouts in Delhi and Mumbai. At current prices of roughly $25,000 or Rs 13.5 lakh per base station, the initial cost of rolling out 4G networks in both metros would be $150 million (Rs 810 crore approximately ). The final deal size could run in excess of $200 million (Rs 1,100 crore approximately) if Huawei is also asked to manage these networks.

This will be Airtel's first 4G network deal announcement after Gopal Vittal took charge as chief executive. ****** was the first Indian telco to launch fourth-generation services about a year ago and it had announced plans to widen its 4G footprint to 8 telecom zones after it acquired 49% in Qualcomm's wireless broadband entities in Delhi, Mumbai, Haryana and Kerala for Rs 924 crore. It had earlier shelled out Rs 3,314.36 crore for wireless broadband airwaves in Kolkata, Karnataka , Punjab and Maharashtra.

****** Airtel did not reply to ET's specific queries on whether it is buying gear from Huawei for expanding its 4G footprint to the country's biggest telecom zones. The Chinese vendor also did not respond to ET's email query on deal size and tenure. A top executive close to the talks, however, said ****** and Huawei were broadening their 4G engagement.

Huawei has supplied 4G networks and devices like dongles and customer premise equipment (CPE) to Airtel in Bangalore, and is likely to do the same in Delhi and Mumbai. Both companies have conducted trails of Huawei's Ascend P1 LTE smartphone, which is the first TD-LTE compatible 4G handset in India, although Airtel did not comment on whether it had finalised its pricing.

"Airtel has not placed purchase orders for 4G gear for potential Delhi and Mumbai rollouts as it is yet to take a call on whether it will have adequate customers to justify a fresh Rs 800 crore investment, given the poor traction of 4G in India in the absence of devices ecosystem and high data tariffs," said another executive who did not wish to be named.

Sector analysts claim investments in a greenfield rollout will be high since 4G airwaves in the 2300 MHz band offer limited coverage unlike frequencies in the 900 MHz, 1800 MHz or 700 MHz bands that more efficient and offer wider coverage.

Till date, ****** has launched 4G services only in Bangalore, Kolkata and Pune and has some 40,000-odd customers, although the company did not confirm this. There is no decision yet to immediately launch in Haryana or Kerala. "4G hasn't taken off since device and data tariffs remain high and Airtel is unlikely to see serious traction unless it launches in Delhi and Mumbai," says Ovum's principal telecoms analyst (consumer services), Shiv Putcha. Putcha expects Airtel to cherry pick launch zones as "its 4G spectrum holdings in key circles are largely strategic acquisitions, especially since India is not ready for 4G as we neither have the relevant content, the devices or the demand to drive wireless broadband services penetration" .

Source
 
Back
Top Bottom