Hu Chunhua: From rural roots to candidate for China premiership， Youth League roots, Poverty fighter

[MH.Yang]

Wang Huning is a big talent under western radar. All the improvement of Chinese narrative and Chinese system marketing initiative is accomplished under Wang. His gangs popularized many concepts especially "Chinese civilization states", "Community of Common Destiny 命运共同体"... posing a lethal challenges to western narratives of human rights and democracy.

His team also popularized the concept of 白左 Baizuo, and facilitate many good catchy terms such as 女拳 feminazi， 票选制度 oligarchy under guise of democracy, 大法党 legal warlordism.

He is far more dangerous to the western than all other members, excluding Xi.

Wang Huning is a very special presence in the Political Bureau. He is also a very rare talent.

Wang Huning has been in the China National Policy Research Institute since 1995, and served as the chief think tank of Jiang Zemin, the then Chinese leader. China's geopolitical policies and means almost all come from Wang Huning.

In 2002, Wang Huning continued to serve as the chief think tank of Hu Jintao, the then Chinese leader.

In 2012, Wang Huning continued to serve as the chief brain trust of Xi, the then Chinese leader.

It can be said that Wang Huning is not only trusted by all factions of the CCP, but also has always been a chess player in China's international geopolitical game.

This person has known Xi for decades and has been a close friend. Although he belongs to the CCP Right, there is no doubt that he is Xi's supporter. He is also able to coordinate the relationship among the various factions of the CCP.

 

[DabbuSardar]

Same performance? really?

View attachment 886365

You went from GDP to fires, im lost lol

 

[beijingwalker]

You went from GDP to fires, im lost lol

You talked about XI's covid failure, I showed you what a real covid failure looks like.

 

[MH.Yang]

So who will become the architect of China Economy after the departure of Liu He?

Liu He is not the first decision-maker of China's economic development policy. Liu He is only the fourth ranked Vice Premier of the State Council of China. China's economic policy is decided by the Premier of the State Council and four Vice Premiers. Liu He is the last one.

 

[DabbuSardar]

You talked about XI's covid failure, I showed you what a real covid failure looks like.

But thats in India, where did you show Xis failure?

 

[GreatHanWarrior]

Please tell me if I am supposed to get mad at these crude snides

Please eat some food and dont get crazy with malnutrition like right now.

When you get sober and eat come back and type bro.

You should also prolly rename yourself to HungryHanWarrior since you keep.talking hunger food malnutrition all the time!!

first, you should feel ashamed.

Modi turned India into a seriously hungry country. Modi makes Indian people malnourished. Modi makes the Indian people shorter. Modi let the Indian people die because there was no oxygen generator....

Then the Indians turned Modi into a god.

If Modi can continue to be PM of India. Why do we question Xi?

shame?

 

[beijingwalker]

But thats in India, where did you shiw Xis failure?

Failure or success can only be defined by comparison. You call Xi' failure, what about Modi's? a success? what about America's?

 

[etylo]

But thats in India, where did you shiw Xis failure?

US your adopted country also failed miserably both in covid pandemic and economy in recent years. US economy is in recession for two consecutive terms now, but, US gov just wont admit it as in recession.

 

[DabbuSardar]

first, you should feel ashamed.

Modi turned India into a seriously hungry country. Modi makes Indian people malnourished. Modi makes the Indian people shorter. Modi let the Indian people die because there was no oxygen generator....

Then the Indians turned Modi into a god.

If Modi can continue to be PM of India. Why do we question Xi?

shame?

Ok bro I am asahmed, but did you manage to get some food?

Please stop talking about food and hunger all the time its making me feel bad...

Failure or success can only be defined by comparison. You call Xi' failure, what about Modi's? a success? what about America's?

You should probably stop insulting all chinese by seeking american validation all.the time...why the constant need to compare with america.
When you surpass them then be happy but dont mock poverty.

US your adopted country also failed miserably both in covid pandemic and economy in recent years. US economy is in recession for two consecutive terms now, but, US gov just wont admit it as in recession.

How is US my adopted countr? Just because you are adopted doesnt make everyone like you

Usa is in recession and boy am I gonna make some money out of it

 

[MH.Yang]

But thats in India, where did you shiw Xis failure?

If data analysis is used. The best prime minister in India's history is Manmohan Singh. Modi is only medium. Although Modi is not as good as Singh, there are many Indian prime ministers worse than Modi.


In 1994, India's GDP was 330 billion US dollars. The global GDP was 27870 billion US dollars. India's GDP accounts for 1.19% of the global GDP.

In 2004 (Singh's term begins), India's GDP was $710 billion. The global GDP is 44.12 trillion US dollars. India's GDP accounts for 1.6% of global GDP.

In 2014(Modi's term begins), India's GDP was 2.04 trillion US dollars. The global GDP was 65.8 trillion US dollars. India's GDP accounts for 3.1% of the global GDP.

In 2021, India's GDP was 3.17 trillion US dollars. The global GDP was 96.1 trillion US dollars. India's GDP accounts for 3.2% of the global GDP.

 

[DabbuSardar]

In 1994, China's GDP was 540 billion US dollars. The US GDP was 7290 billion US dollars. The global GDP was 27870 billion US dollars. The combined GDP of China and USA accounted for 28.1%.

In 2021, China's GDP was 17.8 trillion US dollars. The US GDP was US $22.9 trillion. The global GDP was 96.1 trillion US dollars. The combined GDP of China and USA accounted for 42.4%.


If data analysis is used. The best prime minister in India's history is Manmohan Singh. Modi is only medium. Although Modi is not as good as Singh, there are many Indian prime ministers worse than Modi.


In 1994, India's GDP was 330 billion US dollars. India's GDP accounts for 1.19% of the global GDP.

In 2004 (Singh's term begins), India's GDP was $710 billion. The global GDP is 44.12 trillion US dollars. India's GDP accounts for 1.6% of global GDP.

In 2014(Modi's term begins), India's GDP was 2.04 trillion US dollars. The global GDP was 65.8 trillion US dollars. India's GDP accounts for 3.1% of the global GDP.

In 2021, India's GDP was 3.17 trillion US dollars. India's GDP accounts for 3.2% of the global GDP.

Please arrive at a conclusion for this lengthy analaysis...

 

[MH.Yang]

Please arrive at a conclusion for this lengthy analaysis...

I mean, if we only analyze the absolute growth of GDP, we can't really see the actual economic growth rate.

Because currency inflation exists, and the external economic situation is different.

We should judge the level of economic growth by analyzing the ratio of GDP to world GDP.

During Modi's tenure, India's share of GDP increased from 3.1% to 3.2%. This shows that India's economic growth actually only comes from the economic growth of the whole world. Modi just managed to keep India's economy from falling behind.

In other words, China and the United States are pushing the train forward. And Modi did push ups in the train carriage to exercise his chest muscles. When the train arrived at the station, Modi said that the train was propelled by his chest muscles.

 

[DabbuSardar]

We should judge the level of economic growth by analyzing the ratio of GDP to world GDP.

Who made up that rule!

actual economic growth rate.

The rule above is not for actual economic growth rate.

Take a stab again and see if you can figure out.

 

[MH.Yang]

Who made up that rule!



The rule above is not for actual economic growth rate.

Take a stab again and see if you can figure out.

When comparing the actual economic growth rate of a country, we should consider the economic growth rate of the whole world. It is not appropriate to compare absolute values directly.

First, inflation is different. The actual value of US $1 million in 1992 is different from that of US $1 million in 2022.

Secondly, the external economic environment is different. The growth rate of 6% in 2019(economic recession caused by COVID epidemic) is different from that of 6% in 2014.

Therefore, we must consider the relative value, that is, analyze the economic growth rate from the proportion of the global economy.




BTW: I know some Modi fans will definitely say that the COVID epidemic has affected India's GDP growth. However, the COVID epidemic has had an impact on the world's GDP. If we only analyze the proportion of India's GDP to the global GDP, you can't use COVID epidemic as an excuse.

 

[DabbuSardar]

It is not appropriate to compare absolute values directly

Forget everything else, now you swithced to non- absolutes, earlier you said absolutes are preferred.

So take a moment and pick what you really think...which one is the appropriate measure to compare the growth over a time function, incorporating external factors like your suggestion- inflation and global average, or leaving them out?