What's new

How to stop Ababeel Missile, Forget S400 and Arrow 3. this is what is required and yet they cannot

Not a gloomy picture just reality. China is the most dearest friend we have and no doubt they are a back bone for Pakistan. India is not at war with Pakistan, India is at war with an empire and Nations stand by their military but empires stand by their Alliance. USA as a Nation cannot fight Russia but USA with it's Nato alliance becomes an empire and Russia comes under a disadvantage. But Russia and China as an alliance becomes a balance to NATO and USA.

Yikes! I as an Indian feel isolated!
The tables have turned!
 
India started it all with testing ICBM a threat to China and Pakistan will show a new thing every month until India realizes China's potential and backs off from US agenda. Babur 3 and Ababeel are just the starters. Pakistan has been at work for decades. SCS and Indian Ocean are the issues, Kashmir is no more a problem.

Yikes! I as an Indian feel isolated!
The tables have turned!
It was fate not India. India went for USA but Trump came to white house that is what disturbed the balance of power. Trump
 
First develop a targetable re-entry vehicle and then tell us how was it. Because Pakistani missiles will be hit by Indian ABM before it releases it's un realistic MIRVs
Will you please explain how will Indian interceptor will chase a missile with a speed of Mach 18

Effective firing range

2750 km
Warhead HE/NE
Engine Multi-stage Solid-fuel rocket[citation needed]
Propellant Solid-fuel system[citation needed]

Operational
range
2750 km (1,708 miles)[1]
Speed Mach 18

Guidance
system
Inertial guidance

Launch
platform
Transporter erector launcher (TEL)
Transport spaceport or TEL
 
I am talking about these noob ABM which India has. Do you even know how many sats USA has in orbit just for MIRV and ICBM they can intercept but at what cost trillions of dollars.
Development of indian ABM systems is assisted by Israel and US, Chinese and Russian develop their own ABM for US MIRV equipped ICBM
Do you even know how many sats USA has in orbit just for MIRV and ICBM they can intercept but at what cost trillions of dollars.

What do you mean for your above red sentence
:hitwall::hitwall:
 
Latest MODI just call Trump few hours ago.

Development of indian ABM systems is assisted by Israel and US, Chinese and Russian develop their own ABM for US MIRV equipped ICBM
Do you even know how many sats USA has in orbit just for MIRV and ICBM they can intercept but at what cost trillions of dollars.

What do you mean for your above red sentence
:hitwall::hitwall:
Please go and read this first. before your argument.
https://www.extremetech.com/extreme...k-which-is-why-were-spending-more-money-on-it
 
Will you please explain how will Indian interceptor will chase a missile with a speed of Mach 18

Effective firing range

2750 km
Warhead HE/NE
Engine Multi-stage Solid-fuel rocket[citation needed]
Propellant Solid-fuel system[citation needed]

Operational
range
2750 km (1,708 miles)[1]
Speed Mach 18

Guidance
system
Inertial guidance

Launch
platform
Transporter erector launcher (TEL)
Transport spaceport or TEL
MIRV warheads can easily detected and tracked by IR and RADAR and warhead target can intercepted by duel mode IR or RADAR guided interceptors
 
So why did USA backed of from Russia in Syria if it was a walk in the park to shoot down ICBM and MIRV and LLCM and SLCM and SLBM. Why USA feared and hesitated to attack Russian assets in Syria.
I know WHY
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/01/23/europe/trident-missile-failure-theresa-may/
you have no clue what you talking about kid:lol::lol::rofl: if US attacked Russian assets in Syria, it might be started WW3:hitwall::hitwall::devil::devil::blah::blah:

Latest MODI just call Trump few hours ago.


Please go and read this first. before your argument.
https://www.extremetech.com/extreme...k-which-is-why-were-spending-more-money-on-it
extremely difficult but not impossible
 
you have no clue what you talking about kid:lol::lol::rofl: if US attacked Russian assets in Syria, it might be started WW3:hitwall::hitwall::devil::devil::blah::blah:
you have ABM F 35 F 22 go and start world war 3. Why not, entire world is laughing at USA for what Russia did to USA in Syria and What China is doing in SCS and Philippines President Abused Obama every weak. Please go and find someone else to argue I will ignore you now.
 
you have ABM F 35 F 22 go and start world war 3. Why not, entire world is laughing at USA for what Russia did to USA in Syria and What China is doing in SCS and Philippines President Abused Obama every weak. Please go and find someone else to argue I will ignore you now.
:lol::rofl:you have no logic kid this place is not for yours go play your toys kid:shout::suicide::suicide::suicide2::sarcastic:
 
I see lots of indians are replying on threads related to ABABEEL MISSILE like this ( with emojis or abusive words).either they are in shock or dont have any answer .

No no I get all that!
But if and when india does test it's MIRV, doesn't the same task become even more gargantuan for a lesser resourced Pakistan?
So what happens then? How will Pakistan defend itself when and if that happens?
India has invested (or is in the process of) in developing an ABM system. So it's gaining technical know how of a missile defense system with access to Israeli and American tech.,not saying they would give it to us, but the option exists in theory.
What's Pakistani game plan here?
Our policy is " we will take you down with us "
seriously Check our priorities.our priority is how to hit india . how to defend ourselves comes after it .

This post shows your stupidity:crazy:,than why US investing ABM systems against MIRV equipped Chinese and Russian ICBM, @Hours @Bilal Khan (Quwa), @Oscar, @waz, @Bilal Khan 777, please correct this stupid guy:devil::devil::devil::hitwall:
Usa's bmd & abm are useless against russian & Chinese Mirved ICBM .they were effective to save them from n.korea , cuba , iran etc etc .

:lol::rofl:you have no logic kid this place is not for yours go play your toys kid:shout::suicide::suicide::suicide2::sarcastic:
Maybe he is right . if usa has upper hand in every field then why dont it show muscles to Russia & China?
Obviously there is something which stops them . they know if things went out of hands them Russia & China could hurt usa .
 
DANG that is crazy expensive not to mention susceptible to anti radiation and anti satellite missile. On top of that, it only works over vast geographic distances like from Asia to N. America (not countries right next to each other like Pakistan and india) since it gives the sensors enough time properly distinguish duds from real and figure out the trajectories and that too, if the warheads aren't changing their trajectories. If the warheads are changing their trajectories then even this system becomes an insanely expensive waste of equipment.

what oh what can india do now, looks like checkmate. :(:(:(
 

How many of you think India can do it?

Answer: India neither has the money and nor has the Research and development to come up with the system and if some how they sell half of India and some how manage to buy this type of technology still there is a probability of 30% that it can be stopped successfully.

We've had this since more than a decade now. Work on this had started in the 80s.

The question remains on how effective are ABMs and warning systems on missiles with an average flight time of 10 minutes

The missiles themselves are very effective against slower targets. The problem is the early warning, but that's becoming less and less of a problem as time goes by and more money is spent on airborne assets.

Will you please explain how will Indian interceptor will chase a missile with a speed of Mach 18

Effective firing range

2750 km
Warhead HE/NE
Engine Multi-stage Solid-fuel rocket[citation needed]
Propellant Solid-fuel system[citation needed]

Operational
range
2750 km (1,708 miles)[1]
Speed Mach 18

Guidance
system
Inertial guidance

Launch
platform
Transporter erector launcher (TEL)
Transport spaceport or TEL

You don't chase a missile, you intercept by blocking its path.
 

Back
Top Bottom