What's new

How religious are so-called ‘Islamic terrorists’?

.
Their dedication should then also be gauged with other religions then .. the KKK are very dedicated to Christianity for e.g

Yeah I checked some KKK sites out of curiosity, they are super religious and keep talking about Jesus (while simultaneously attacking Jews in every sentence...the irony).
 
.
Who decides what is considered a war as I had heard that many groups consider that there are indeed fighting a war.

Only the state has authority to declare war, no individual group can declare war.


Who decides who are considered true Muslims as I have heard each group claiming they are the true Muslims?

That is an excellent question and its sad but true that all groups call themselves the true muslims and all other groups kafris (non-believers). In my opinion, as long as they believe the very basics of Islam (one God and last prophet Muhammad) and follow the Quran, and do all the right things and do no cause harm to anyone else then they are muslims, and Allah will judge their actions in the afterlife.
 
.
Islamic terrorist unfortunately is a catch all word to describe all muslims who fight, whatever their cause might be... they got both types of people, those who have a political goal, and those who are fighting for political islam.. the second group is undoubtedly religious and get inspiration from quran and hadith(their words not mine, and I have no reason to disbelieve a person ready to die a painful death)...
it gets murky when the same terror campaign has both types of foot soldiers and leaders...

I dont think one should expect muslims to 'sort it out'... why should a normal muslim be more responsible than a hindu or christian or buddist... this puts muslims on backfoot and they try to solve the problem by defining 'what is muslim'...

Yeah I checked some KKK sites out of curiosity, they are super religious and keep talking about Jesus (while simultaneously attacking Jews in every sentence...the irony).
KKK is a white supremacist org, many of them might be devout christian, but they mostly hate 'other people'... a white muslim will be treated more favorably by them than a black christian.
 
.
Islamic terrorist unfortunately is a catch all word to describe all muslims who fight, whatever their cause might be... they got both types of people, those who have a political goal, and those who are fighting for political islam.. the second group is undoubtedly religious and get inspiration from quran and hadith(their words not mine, and I have no reason to disbelieve a person ready to die a painful death)...
it gets murky when the same terror campaign has both types of foot soldiers and leaders...

I dont think one should expect muslims to 'sort it out'... why should a normal muslim be more responsible than a hindu or christian or buddist... this puts muslims on backfoot and they try to solve the problem by defining 'what is muslim'...

There is no cause worthy enough that innocents can be killed.

Sorry, you are wrong on this. If that is the case, then each and every person has "his" cause which he deems worthy enough to harm others. This failed philosophy has no place in these times.

Unless we castigate & eradicate each and every person harming innocents, no matter the cause, we won't survive.

KKK is a white supremacist org, many of them might be devout christian, but they mostly hate 'other people'... a white muslim will be treated more favorably by them than a black christian.

If you ask a KKK guy he would give the same rational you gave for Kashmiri terrorists...
 
.
There is no cause worthy enough that innocents can be killed.

Sorry, you are wrong on this. If that is the case, then each and every person has "his" cause which he deems worthy enough to harm others. This failed philosophy has no place in these times.

Unless we castigate & eradicate each and every person harming innocents, no matter the cause, we won't survive.



If you ask a KKK guy he would give the same rational you gave for Kashmiri terrorists...
I am not justifying anybody's action, just saying we need to be nuanced about what we are dealing with, otherwise we wont have a solution targeted for the specific issue.
The IRA was a terrorist org, no doubt, but it was more politically motivated than religious, religion just gave a clean friend-vs-foe difference... the solution to invite catholic priests to condemn daily attack will not work simply because you got the reason wrong... the mayhem was stopped by a political deal.

what do you think of killing baby Hitler if you could go back in time?(a well known ethical question)
 
Last edited:
.
After killing so many innocent people, the Christian terrorist is just in the jail while he should be dead.

One of the more important parts of the Ten Commandments is
* Thou shalt not kill

People that kill others, even when that is justified by human law and God are punished by God.
 
.
I am not justifying anybody's action, just saying we need to be nuanced about what we are dealing with, otherwise we wont have a solution targeted for the specific issue.

Let me call out your crap right now and reiterate..

There is no cause worthy enough that innocents can be killed.

Do you think the so called "Gau Rakshaks" beating the dalits or killing Akhlaq is for a worthy cause?

Killing innocents & harming them in name of causes has become a fashion now a days. And people have the gall to justify it!

I am sure the person who did the horrible bombing in Quetta yesterday had a cause too - At least I am sure that terrorist told himself that he had one...

What is wrong with people who justify killing of innocents in name of causes!?
 
.
Let me call out your crap right now and reiterate..

There is no cause worthy enough that innocents can be killed.

Do you think the so called "Gau Rakshaks" beating the dalits or killing Akhlaq is for a worthy cause?

Killing innocents & harming them in name of causes has become a fashion now a days. And people have the gall to justify it!

I am sure the person who did the horrible bombing in Quetta yesterday had a cause too - At least I am sure that terrorist told himself that he had one...

What is wrong with people who justify killing of innocents in name of causes!?
You didn't get his point....look at it like this...there are Buddhist terrorists killing innocents in Myanmar for a Buddhist cause....they can be called BUDDHIST Terrorist...now if there are Tibetan terrorists killing Chinese people for a Tibetan cause they have to be called Tibetan Terrorists...even though Tibetans are Buddhists....the cause will decide what they are called.
 
.
Let me call out your crap right now and reiterate..

There is no cause worthy enough that innocents can be killed.

Do you think the so called "Gau Rakshaks" beating the dalits or killing Akhlaq is for a worthy cause?

Killing innocents & harming them in name of causes has become a fashion now a days. And people have the gall to justify it!

I am sure the person who did the horrible bombing in Quetta yesterday had a cause too - At least I am sure that terrorist told himself that he had one...

What is wrong with people who justify killing of innocents in name of causes!?
ok sunny pa ji... go uproot some tubewell... :)
 
. .
Most of these militants are confused alcohol consuming people that had no other place to go in life. That's why Isis is so appealing to them. It gives them a purpose and a sense of belonging. None of these groups existed before 2000s. Taliban did but they confined themselves to Afghanistan to fight invaders.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom