How one gets positive and negative ratings?

[Death Adder]

I don’t know how it works but i was given negative rating by TT member, when i criticised papa john general bajwa and raised questions about his declared asset.

 

[Galactic Penguin SST]

Look no further.

It is an execution. Vendetta is obvious.

Proof here, Senior Member @DalalErMaNodi gets an automatic negative rating at every reply, whatever the content!

Thus scoring the record -507 negative rating!

You can selectively delete specific entries from the browsing history in most browsers

I get power tools ads all day long, because I searched for a drill bit set once


Worst part is it makes me regret the purchase of my drilling machine because newer more powerful models show up in the ads at a bargain price.


I was ripped off


Even the ads manage to condescend me

Why are you in incognito mode though ?

Why should they need to demoralise a society where you're actively encouraged to have sex at the age of thirteen.


They can't be demoralised any further, family values are dying in the west.

And even ELITE MEMBER @Reichsmarschall received in the same thread his negative rating for this:

See these ads are based on your browsing history, since I am a programmer and most of my researches are related to programming so the ads I see on pdf are also related to programming and softwares.

All by the same Crazy IVAN!!!

 

[DalalErMaNodi]

Look no further.

It is an execution. Vendetta is obvious.

Proof here, Senior Member @DalalErMaNodi gets an automatic negative rating at every reply, whatever the content!

Thus scoring the record -507 negative rating!






And even ELITE MEMBER @Reichsmarschall received in the same thread his negative rating for this:



All by the same Crazy IVAN!!!

wow, I didn't think anyone would notice.



It all happened on the day of the forum update 23 August was it ? There was a bug where anyone could give positive and negative ratings.



This user IVAN trawled my profile for 4 straight hours, negatively rating over 50 of my posts, I still haven't bothered to count the real number.

He wouldn't stop, so I just made my profile private and then it finally stopped.



Before then I had never received one negative rating, simply because my posts don't call for negative ratings, on the other hand, I had received 5 positives in 2 months of joining the forum.



I wrote about his abuse of the bug on GHQ but the mods seemed least bothered, never even got a reply.



I'm surprised to see it's happened to others too.

Mods need to take action.


Interestingly, I have never interacted with this user nor seen their posts before that day, I stick to my sub forum mostly.

And am I the most negatively rated user ?

 

[xyxmt]

I can only teach you how to get -ve rating and get banned.

 

[Galactic Penguin SST]

All this rating thingy is utterly nonsens, because it is fixed and totally misleading.

One textbook example and case study was the newly registered user @Ich, who joined the forum on 14th March 2018, today a FULL MEMBER, and who got a POSITIVE Rating as swiftly as its 3rd post on 30th March 2018!

No, we all know that the US has the ability for 6th gen fighter ect. But they are not leading as the news articel claims.

Silly comment indeed, never deserving any positive rating! But, but, it was given by an old buddy of another forum!

That injustice was both so ridiculous and outrageous, serving as an eye-opener, that I learned the lesson: do not take any internet forum too seriously.

Just post like you would insert your daily token in the slot of your favourite arcade video game, only for entertainment purpose, nothing more!

Username @Ich is indeed an old acquaintance, first met in the 2011 and now defunct IMF. So no room for any imponderable misunderstanding here.

And am I the most negatively rated user ?

While the top 20 highest reaction score can be found here, no pages are recording the worse reaction scores.

But no other members have reach this -507 level according to my memory.

Trollbots such as @oprih have usually -27, @opruh has -21 before being retired under the guise of a "ban".

Never seen negative triple digit rating before.

 

[Ich]

All this rating thingy is utterly nonsens, because it is fixed and totally misleading.

One textbook example and case study was the newly registered user @Ich, who joined the forum on 14th March 2018, today a FULL MEMBER, and who got a POSITIVE Rating as swiftly as its 3rd post on 30th March 2018!



Silly comment indeed, never deserving any positive rating! But, but, it was given by an old buddy of another forum!

That injustice was both so ridiculous and outrageous, serving as an eye-opener, that I learned the lesson: do not take any internet forum too seriously.

Just post like you would insert your daily token in the slot of your favourite arcade video game, only for entertainment purpose, nothing more!

Username @Ich is indeed an old acquaintance, first met in the 2011 and now defunct IMF. So no room for any imponderable misunderstanding here.




While the top 20 highest reaction score can be found here, no pages are recording the worse reaction scores.

But no other members have reach this -507 level according to my memory.

Trollbots such as @oprih have usually -27, @opruh has -21 before being retired under the guise of a "ban".

Never seen negative triple digit rating before.

Hahaha, didnt you know that Russia invented a 6th gen fighterjet engine for also use in very very high atmosphere nearly 10 years ago? So nothing is wrong with my statement from 2018.

But all is wrong with you.

 

[Windjammer]

At one time, these ratings had their value and effect but lately they have become a joke.
With MODS not being active in this field, a certain group of title holders are on the mission of only supporting and crediting each other or as they say ''Petti Bhai''. Hence, we see a decline in the quality and contribution on the forum. Sad state of affairs.

 

[WebMaster]

At one time, these ratings had their value and effect but lately they have become a joke.
With MODS not being active in this field, a certain group of title holders are on the mission of only supporting and crediting each other or as they say ''Petti Bhai''. Hence, we see a decline in the quality and contribution on the forum. Sad state of affairs.

We need a dedicated person to review the ratings and reverse if needed. Let me know if anyone is interested.

 

[Windjammer]

We need a dedicated person to review the ratings and reverse if needed. Let me know if anyone is interested.

Boss, all Title holders should be dedicated in their execution of duty, both to maintain the status of PDF and their own reputation.

 

[WebMaster]

Boss, all Title holders should be dedicated in their execution of duty, both to maintain the status of PDF and their own reputation.

I agree, which is why this is the call to take those duties.

 

[truthfollower]

@WebMaster how can one get rid of negative ratings?

 

[WebMaster]

@WebMaster how can one get rid of negative ratings?

You can send here the post link.
And get post link from here: https://defence.pk/pdf/account/reactions

 

[KAL-EL]

Boss, all Title holders should be dedicated in their execution of duty, both to maintain the status of PDF and their own reputation.

Incredibly well said..

We need a dedicated person to review the ratings and reverse if needed. Let me know if anyone is interested.

Sounds like a good idea. But of course, whoever this person is, he/she should be incredibly unbiased.

Not someone who will ‘help out their friends‘ and/or let rating stand for persons they don’t like. if you get my drift?

 

[truthfollower]

You can send here the post link.
And get post link from here: https://defence.pk/pdf/account/reactions

I have one positive rating and one negative rating

but why it is showing -2 on my profile?

shouldn't it be 0?

-1+1=0?

 

[truthfollower]

now my reaction score is -4

good lesson
never give any feedback to mods