How LCA-Tejas MK1A stakes up against JF-17 and Gripen-E in terms of Affordability?

[EAK]

LOL..Feel good thread..Ura to nai saktay chalo compare kr k hee dil khush kr lety hain...Even then they chose Blk2 to compare..

 

[Water Car Engineer]

Dont forgt that There is a reason why indian navy reject lca .

Do you think the IN will accept the JF17, serious question.

 

[Dazzler]

just a fantasy parade of an LCA fanboy cannot be called a comparison.

Do you think the IN will accept the JF17, serious question.

Not until it has 40 major design flaws, less than adequate range, Yankee engine, Zionist radar and bvr missile that is yet to be fully exploited and the list goes on.

I forgot the ever green delays and budget overruns.

 

[Logicaldude]

just a fantasy parade of an LCA fanboy cannot be called a comparison.

True. The article states the LCA engine is imported while forgetting all of JF17 including engine is imported too.

 

[Water Car Engineer]

Not until it has 40 major design flaws, less than adequate range, Yankee engine, Zionist radar and bvr missile that is yet to be fully exploited and the list goes on.

I forgot the ever green delays and budget overruns.

It's a yes or no question, do you think the IN will accept the JF17 in their airwing?

 

[Dazzler]

It's a yes or no question, do you think the IN will accept the JF17 in their airwing?

yes. absolutely.

 

[Water Car Engineer]

yes. absolutely.

No, they wont. They want a twin engine fighter along the lines of a Rafale, F18 Super Hornet.

The IN always thinks long term, but the fact they even took in Tejas from the beginning was something no one expected them to do. They are still supporting it as a TD for the eventual N-AMCA.

 

[JOEY TRIBIANI]

You are talking as if JF 17 is inducted by Pakistan Navy. Indian navy rejected it because it was under power for naval operation which requires atleast 20 to 30% higher thrust with twin engine configuration and Tejas does not fit into that. When we will build one with our own HAL 35 to 40 KN Dry thrust twin engine version, IN will happily accept it.

Ehmm . . we have international buyers . .

Do you think the IN will accept the JF17, serious question.

Bl-3 . yeah

 

[Water Car Engineer]

Bl-3 . yeah

No, they wont. The RFI is basically designed for a long range, twin engined fighter. Not even a naval F16 would cut it, please forget JF17. So many of you turds keep knocking Tejas for not making the cut for the IN, your best F16 wont either.


IN wants something along the lines of this --

 

[faithfulguy]

JF17 block3 whoops Tejas any day of the week.PERIOD!

That is not that hard as Tejas is still in initial rate of production stage. F-35 is already further along in production than the Texas Fighter.

 

[JOEY TRIBIANI]

No, they wont. The RFI is basically designed for a long range, twin engined fighter. Not even a naval F16 would cut it, please forget JF17. So many of you turds keep knocking Tejas for not making the cut for the IN, your best F16 wont either.


IN wants something along the lines of this --

Stop pretending blue water navy with Russian junk from 80's .

 

[Water Car Engineer]

Stop pretending blue water navy with Russian junk from 80's .

Well, these birds arent for the Russian craft, but IAC-1.

 

[faithfulguy]

"WILL" being the operative 34 year old word here, isn't it ?

Such as India will always be the supa Powa of tomorrow.

 

[Leviza]

Only Mad cows can compare JF17 and lca

One is flying and engaging international acknowledges
And
Other is after so many years of development is still in development lol

 

[faithfulguy]

Only Mad cows can compare JF17 and lca

One is flying and engaging international acknowledges
And
Other is after so many years of development is still in development lol

In all other countries, they would have cut the project long time ago as this project is a corruption scheme.