How China Is Humiliating Pakistan - nationalinterest.org

[BL33D]

You claim to be the messenger then affirm his article of non sense, then requested not to be the target.

A clickbait title doesnt mean its non sense. I dont know how did you arrive to that conclusion.

 

[Beast]

By that standard, Al jazeera, reuters, cgtn, xinhua, any think tank actually, is a propaganda tool for their respective countries.

https://nationalinterest.org/feature/kashmir-casualty-indias-rising-power-status-90311

Sure, u need to agree to this.... too. From the same publisher.

In Modi’s first term in office (2014–2019), the government portrayed India—especially to international audiences—as a dynamic economy and responsible international actor. At home, it set about “saffronizing” public institutions and turning a blind eye to vigilante violence against Muslim and lower-caste minorities. With a thumping re-election win earlier this year, critics see the latest Kashmir policy as the next step in this Hindutva agenda.

 

[BL33D]

https://nationalinterest.org/feature/kashmir-casualty-indias-rising-power-status-90311

Sure, u need to agree to this.... too. From the same publisher.

In Modi’s first term in office (2014–2019), the government portrayed India—especially to international audiences—as a dynamic economy and responsible international actor. At home, it set about “saffronizing” public institutions and turning a blind eye to vigilante violence against Muslim and lower-caste minorities. With a thumping re-election win earlier this year, critics see the latest Kashmir policy as the next step in this Hindutva agenda.

I dont know why you think I have to agree to it. I would love to discuss. And moreover, I wouldnt ask it to be taken down the least.

 

[letsrock]

Nothing substantial in the article just screaming.

 

[Lincoln]

A clickbait title doesnt mean its non sense. I dont know how did you arrive to that conclusion.

The article is not worth replying to in detail. You can imagine what you like.

 

[Beast]

I dont know why you think I have to agree to it. I would love to discuss. And moreover, I wouldnt ask it to be taken down the least.

Typical response. Avoid article that is disadvantage to you but from same source. Too ashame to talk about it, right?

I just ask you one word. Is it legit or not?

 

[BL33D]

Typical response. Avoid article that is disadvantage to you but from same source. Too ashame to talk about it, right?

I just ask you one word. Is it legit or not?

I think you have problems understanding English. I said I am open to discuss it. But do you want me to discuss a different article here ? And what do you mean its legit or not. Either the content has more truth or less truth to it. And people discuss to get their own understanding of it. Dont try to make false equivalence. Point me out if I have ever said to take that post down.

 

[Beast]

I think you have problems understanding English. I said I am open to discuss it. But do you want me to discuss a different article here ? And what do you mean its legit or not. Either the content has more truth or less truth to it. And people discuss to get their own understanding of it. Dont try to make false equivalence. Point me out if I have ever said to take that post down.

This is the reply you give after some claim that publisher is propaganda tools.

"By that standard, Al jazeera, reuters, cgtn, xinhua, any think tank actually, is a propaganda tool for their respective countries."

So can you answer me, is nationalist interest is writing propaganda article about kashmir or it is writing the truth?
Tell me yes or not? I just want simple answer which you desperate to avoid it.

 

[Lincoln]

I think you have problems understanding English. I said I am open to discuss it. But do you want me to discuss a different article here ? And what do you mean its legit or not. Either the content has more truth or less truth to it. And people discuss to get their own understanding of it. Dont try to make false equivalence. Point me out if I have ever said to take that post down.

You can discuss it all you want. His question is valid. Do you, or do you not, think the content of the quoted article by Beast is legit and valid?

 

[BL33D]

This is the reply you give after some claim that publisher is propaganda tools.

"By that standard, Al jazeera, reuters, cgtn, xinhua, any think tank actually, is a propaganda tool for their respective countries."

So can you answer me, is nationalist interest is writing propaganda article about kashmir or it is writing the truth?
Tell me yes or not? I just want simple answer which you desperate to avoid it.

Bruhhhh, that was a rhetorical question and not a statement. See that is the problem. Communication.

You can discuss it all you want. His question is valid. Do you, or do you not, think the content of the quoted article by Beast is legit and valid?

Its something written by someone and deserves to be read and discussed. Thats my point. It might have some good points and some bad. Asking such black and white question of legit or not makes no sense.

 

[Shahzaz ud din]

Inside Pakistan, India is an obsession

 

[Beast]

Bruhhhh, that was a rhetorical question and not a statement. See that is the problem. Communication.

LOL.. What a loser u are. You think u are so smart, using poison on others and think you will be immune too?
If u want to use nationalist interest as weapon against Pakistan or China then better be ready to take the bullet when it question yours.
You think we readers are idiot? This thread can be deleted since OP also avoid question about its validity while desperate try to ask us to answer your inquiry.

 

[BL33D]

LOL.. What a loser u are. You think u are so smart, using poison on others and think you will be immune too?
If u want to use nationalist interest as weapon against Pakistan or China then better be ready to take the bullet when it question yours.
You think we readers are idiot? This thread can be deleted since OP also avoid question about its validity while desperate try to ask us to answer your inquiry.

Post any articles you wish. I will gladly participate. You are still unable to understand my response.

 

[W.11]

BS article

 

[Smarana Mitra]

Most are against us, but I enjoy discussing about them cause some have valid arguements, but not this one, there is nothing in this article.

Not every Indian supports these kind of websites. National Interest is propaganda website. I find it cheap that people can't even post from reliable platform and have to hijack western propagandas whenever it suits them.

Its something written by someone and deserves to be read and discussed. Thats my point. It might have some good points and some bad. Asking such black and white question of legit or not makes no sense.

Some websites and sources are known to only act as propagandas. It is always biased and hence there is very little to discuss. You must be more careful in choosing the source. Tomorrow, the same filthy website will post an article against India as and when it suits their master's interests. Then you will have very little legitimacy to dismiss them if you yourself have endorsed that website's content in the past. At least get a reliable source which won't turn against you in the future instead of posting anything you get.