Not sure about "urine jihad"
and some of the other stuff like mixing stuff in food but there are some true bits there too.
"
Simple patriotic sentiments, so long as they do not contravene the higher conviction of man is permissible in Islam, like the affection one feels towards one's father, son and family. But as already shown, nationalism does not stop at simple sentiments. It is a socio-political creed and an actual way of life which aims at a full control of man's individual and social conduct. Islam, too, being a school having its own independent, spiritual, practical, political and social system and comprising a particular set of beliefs, it naturally comes into conflict with the school of nationalism.
Unlike other religions such as Christianity, Buddhism etc, Islam is not confined to religious rites and metaphysical convictions. Had Islam been only a religion of devotions, it might have agreed with nationalism. But Islam is a religion with asocial and philosophical worldview, and provides for economic and political principles. Nationalism, too, has its own social and political principles based however on different beliefs and criteria. Therefore, conflict between Islam and nationalism is inevitable. The Islamic ideology is not compatible with any other ideology on the question of sovereignty over the private and social life of Muslims. A Muslim cannot at the same time be a Muslim and a polytheist, or a Muslim and communist. In Islam, there is no room for one to be a loyal and genuine nationalist. It is a question of identity, and one negates the other.
Nationalism is incompatible with Islam, both schools having two opposite ideologies. These two assume two totally opposite poles in their spirit, essence, direction and goal.
As we shall explain later, the Quran has explicitly rejected the basis of nationalism, and states that language, colour and race are no criteria for unity and privilege. The only criteria are belief and virtue. A common ideology is the basis of the unity of the Islamic ummah, not race, country, language or even culture. The goal of nationalism is to create national units, whereas the goal of Islam is universal unity. To nationalism what matters the most is loyalty and attachment to the homeland, whereas to Islam, it is God and religion. Nationalism gives authenticity to geographical boundaries and racial distinctions, whereas Islam negates them. Nationalism inclines to limitation and race, but Islam assumes a universal outlook.
Nationalism attaches value only to the historical traditions, culture, civilization, ideas and historical figures of its own nation, but Islam's vision goes beyond the frontier, race, tribe and nation. Moses, Jesus, Muhammad and Ali are considered as belonging to all mankind. Islam wishes all nations to regard the Quran as their Book, and the Ka'aba as their Qibla, and true leaders of Islam as their leaders."
read the rest here:
https://www.al-islam.org/islam-and-...hammed-naqvi/part-seven-islam-and-nationalism
and this:
"Question: Is nationalism a call of Jaahiliyaah and is Haram in Islam? Answer in the light of Qur'an and Sunnah.
Answer:
Praise be to Allah, the Lord of the Worlds; and may His blessings and peace be upon our Prophet Muhammad and upon all his Family and Companions. Nationalism in the sense of chauvinism means excessive devotion to a nation, a colour, a race or an ethnic group like Arab nationalism is a sort of Jahiliya (ignorant beliefs of the pre-Islamic era). It is prohibited in Shariah as the person's adherence and devotion should stem from right creed and piety. Allah Says (interpretation of meaning): {…Verily, the most honourable of you with Allâh is that (believer) who has At-Taqwa [i.e. one of the Muttaqûn (pious)] …}[49: 13]. The Prophet (Sallallahu Alaihi wa Sallam) said: "There is no preference of an Arab over a non-Arab, or a non-Arab over an Arab, or a white person over a black one, or a black person over a white one except by piety. In fact, all people are from Adam and Adam is from sand" [ Ahmad and al-Baihaqi ]. The enemies of Islam succeeded in preparing some men from our own community who call for adherence and devotion on a basis other than religion and belief. These men's adherence is for the language, the colour of the skin ----. Such a campaign succeeded in gathering many followers. So, one should explain this to people and warn them against it. Allah knows best."
Explore the relationship between nationalism and Islam in this insightful discussion. This text examines whether nationalism, viewed as excessive devotion to a nation or ethnicity, is a call to Jahiliya (preIslamic ignorance) and forbidden in Islam. It emphasizes that true allegiance should...
www.islamweb.net
Fair sources, no right wing anti muslim propaganda there.... but Islam is an expansionist ideology.
In India the dominant culture is one of.. pagan idol worship, if you will. It's been here for thousands of years preceding Islam. It is a very accepting philosophy that believes in the brotherhood of man, it is not a rigid proselytizing extreme rules based militantly expansionist ideology.
I could dig up a lot of genuine Islamic sources, not hindutva bigotry or anything of the sort on what Islam says about "idol worship" but you probably already know that stuff.
Guess it all depends on how seriously someone takes Islam, do they become literalist crazies like the Salafists ? not talking about terrorism, just their whole outlook on life, their worldview. Those guys hate us "pagans" with a passion and can never be loyal to a place like India, hell, they're unhappy even in Islamic countries in the middle east and don't like the royal families. Sadly, even the majority of the moderate ones hang on to ideas like "kaffir" and "mushrik" etc
Hindutva is nothing but cultural nationalism, the Shia and their sub sects are mostly unabashedly pro India. Sunnis not so much, the more religious they get, the more they hate every other type on Indian.. in fact they hate the Shia more than Hindutvawaadis lol.
We'd have a full on Saudi supporters vs Iran supporters hot war here if it weren't for the benevolent Hindu rashtra leadership, beginning with Nehru and including his clan/dynasty and continuing with Modi/Shah today.
Stop posting worthless fringe trash that nobody reads, you're only misleading yourself and your readers... we can talk about real issues in a civil way if you want.