What's new

Hillary Clinton criticises Australia for "two-timing" America with China

Raphael

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 1, 2012
Messages
3,287
Reaction score
5
Country
China
Location
China
Hillary Clinton criticises Australia for two-timing America with China

Former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has caned Australia for two-timing – becoming overly dependent on China as a trading partner while expecting Washington to defend from a Beijing that is becoming more aggressive in the region – militarily and territorially.

Interviewed for Fairfax Media’s Good Weekend on the launch of her memoir Hard Choices, Clinton warned that the Abbott government’s drive for even more trade with China “makes you dependent, to an extent that can undermine your freedom of movement and your sovereignty, economic and political.”

Told that Trade Minister Andrew Robb had led a 630-strong trade mission through several Chinese cities in April, Clinton, who is likely to be the Democratic Party nominee to succeed Barack Obama as US president, said: “Well that is a mistake. It’s a mistake whether you’re a country, or a company or an individual to put, as we say in the vernacular, all your eggs in the one basket.

“Just as it was a mistake for Europe to become so dependent on a single supplier. Starting in March 2009, I made that case to the Europeans, that they were increasingly dependent on gas from Russia. They'd already had two experiences, in 2006 and 2009, where for their own purposes, Russia cut off the gas, actually causing people to freeze to death – in Poland and elsewhere.”

Her warning came in the context of a discussion of whether Washington’s much-vaunted pivot to Asia, which she claims as her initiative, is succeeding as a bulwark against China’s economic and strategic might.

Clinton refrained from storybook language as she explained the strategy, but as she outlines the effort which was formally launched in 2012, for the US to reassert itself in Asia, there was a hint of the poor little countries of the region, a freckle-faced Australia included, being pushed around by the Beijing bullies; and of them pleading with their American buddies to walk down the street with them – just in case the agro in the air became more than menacing.

With an insatiable appetite for natural resources, China now accounts for more than 35 per cent of Australia’s trade.

In the past, Mr Abbott wanted to lecture the Chinese leadership on human rights and territorial bad manners, and on winning government last year, he at first seemed to irritate Beijing. More recently, the Prime Minister has taken a different route – in China in April, he did not mention the US by name; and on reform, he talked about what the Chinese were doing as opposed to not doing.

“Australia is strong enough to be a valuable partner, but not a dominant one – Team Australia is here in China to help build the Asian century,” he said during the visit. As he departed, the PM quoted an old line from reformist Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping – “To be rich is indeed glorious” to which he added an Abbott flourish – “But to be a true friend is sublime.”

And in the same week that Ms Clinton spoke to Good Weekend, Mr Abbott was in the US, demonstrating the belief that Australia can keep doing the splits.

Citing China as a superpower rival to the US, rather than as the potential threat seen by Australia and its regional neighbours in Ms Clinton’s telling of the genesis of the US pivot to Asia, Abbott told a meeting of the American Chamber of Commerce in Washington: “As citizens of a great power, it’s understandable that Americans should be wary of potential rivals, [but] for Americans to begrudge what the Chinese haven’t achieved more than to admire what they have is out of character – especially as the movement, in just a generation, of hundreds of millions of Chinese into the middle class is a transformation unparalleled in human history.”

And then he marched down Pennsylvania Avenue, to the White House, to tell President Obama about the need for a great power such as the US, to act to balance a resurgent China in Australia’s backyard – to the point of seeking to lock in the American president to stationing more than the 1150 US troops now on rotation in Australia and even more than the projected increase in their number to 2500, to the point of having the Americans establish a permanent base, probably at Stirling WA. Because, according to reporters briefed by Abbott’s entourage, the Prime Minister sees all this is crucial to the success of the pivot.


-----------------------------------

Wow, first Monica Lewinsky, now Australia. Will this hag ever catch a break :cheesy:?
 
. . .
Hillary Clinton criticises Australia for two-timing America with China

Former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has caned Australia for two-timing – becoming overly dependent on China as a trading partner while expecting Washington to defend from a Beijing that is becoming more aggressive in the region – militarily and territorially.

Interviewed for Fairfax Media’s Good Weekend on the launch of her memoir Hard Choices, Clinton warned that the Abbott government’s drive for even more trade with China “makes you dependent, to an extent that can undermine your freedom of movement and your sovereignty, economic and political.”

Told that Trade Minister Andrew Robb had led a 630-strong trade mission through several Chinese cities in April, Clinton, who is likely to be the Democratic Party nominee to succeed Barack Obama as US president, said: “Well that is a mistake. It’s a mistake whether you’re a country, or a company or an individual to put, as we say in the vernacular, all your eggs in the one basket.

“Just as it was a mistake for Europe to become so dependent on a single supplier. Starting in March 2009, I made that case to the Europeans, that they were increasingly dependent on gas from Russia. They'd already had two experiences, in 2006 and 2009, where for their own purposes, Russia cut off the gas, actually causing people to freeze to death – in Poland and elsewhere.”

Her warning came in the context of a discussion of whether Washington’s much-vaunted pivot to Asia, which she claims as her initiative, is succeeding as a bulwark against China’s economic and strategic might.

Clinton refrained from storybook language as she explained the strategy, but as she outlines the effort which was formally launched in 2012, for the US to reassert itself in Asia, there was a hint of the poor little countries of the region, a freckle-faced Australia included, being pushed around by the Beijing bullies; and of them pleading with their American buddies to walk down the street with them – just in case the agro in the air became more than menacing.

With an insatiable appetite for natural resources, China now accounts for more than 35 per cent of Australia’s trade.

In the past, Mr Abbott wanted to lecture the Chinese leadership on human rights and territorial bad manners, and on winning government last year, he at first seemed to irritate Beijing. More recently, the Prime Minister has taken a different route – in China in April, he did not mention the US by name; and on reform, he talked about what the Chinese were doing as opposed to not doing.

“Australia is strong enough to be a valuable partner, but not a dominant one – Team Australia is here in China to help build the Asian century,” he said during the visit. As he departed, the PM quoted an old line from reformist Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping – “To be rich is indeed glorious” to which he added an Abbott flourish – “But to be a true friend is sublime.”

And in the same week that Ms Clinton spoke to Good Weekend, Mr Abbott was in the US, demonstrating the belief that Australia can keep doing the splits.

Citing China as a superpower rival to the US, rather than as the potential threat seen by Australia and its regional neighbours in Ms Clinton’s telling of the genesis of the US pivot to Asia, Abbott told a meeting of the American Chamber of Commerce in Washington: “As citizens of a great power, it’s understandable that Americans should be wary of potential rivals, [but] for Americans to begrudge what the Chinese haven’t achieved more than to admire what they have is out of character – especially as the movement, in just a generation, of hundreds of millions of Chinese into the middle class is a transformation unparalleled in human history.”

And then he marched down Pennsylvania Avenue, to the White House, to tell President Obama about the need for a great power such as the US, to act to balance a resurgent China in Australia’s backyard – to the point of seeking to lock in the American president to stationing more than the 1150 US troops now on rotation in Australia and even more than the projected increase in their number to 2500, to the point of having the Americans establish a permanent base, probably at Stirling WA. Because, according to reporters briefed by Abbott’s entourage, the Prime Minister sees all this is crucial to the success of the pivot.


-----------------------------------

Wow, first Monica Lewinsky, now Australia. Will this hag ever catch a break :cheesy:?


Oh dont mind her, the woman has lost her mind.Probably because Billy boo has realized the crazy butcher in her and might be doing something behind the back..


USA and its double standards. :rolleyes:
 
. . . . . .
Hilarious. This lady will probably be the next president.
 
.
I really hope she doesn't become President, she's an idiot. She views U.S-China relations as a rivalry and thinks countries have to pick sides. It's a dangerous thought.

Pakistanis call her 'an unpleaseable mother in law'.

Foreign relations are not a zero sum case. Seriously, @Aeronaut ?

Australia has had it easy for 25 straight years due to Chinese mineral demand. Now they face very tough choices.

Australia needs structural reforms. It must become a republic with a Presidential system as the Parlimentry system isn't working for Australia. They also need structural reforms in economics and defense.
 
Last edited:
.
Please eff off Ms Clinton, Australia like all independent nations will have good relations with whomsoever it damn well pleases.
 
. . .
Pakistanis call her 'an unpleaseable mother in law'.
Australia needs structural reforms. It must become a republic with a Presidential system as the Parlimentry system isn't working for Australia. They also need structural reforms in economics and defense.

Based on what? Seems you are plucking these things out of thin air. Our parliamentary system is working fine and is irrelevant to the topic of this thread.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom