You are trying very hard to not see the obvious, Masterda Surys Sen was born as an Indian, lived as an Indian, believed himself to be an Indian, fought for the freedom of India, and sacrificed his life for India. He was an Indian of Bengali ethnicity, his nationality was not 'Bangladeshi', because Bangladesh didn't exist as a nation in his time! It was India, read the Bengali literature of that time, they all considered themselves Bharatbasi.
Pakistanis or Indians don't suffer from such confusion! Many of the top Pakistani leaders were born in India, starting from Md Ali Jinnah himself to Musharraf and Nawaz Sharif (I think), but neither Indians nor Pakistanis would claim them to be Indians, same goes for Indian personalities born in what is Pakistan today.
Tell me one thing, Pakistanis never claim Bhagat Singh to be a Pakistani, though he was born in Lahore, then why Bangladeshis make their claim on proud Indians like Masterda Surya Sen? Is it because Bangladesh as a country failed to produce enough icons of their own?
Make a list of all the freedom fighters who fought against the British for the freedom of India...undivided India, and you will see at least 90% of them, if not more, are Hindus.
But that's not the topic here.
I am exactly saying the opposite!
A deceased person's origin doesn't change as soon as borders are re-drawn, and that's why Masterda Surys Sen will always remain an Indian, and he didn't automatically became a Bangladeshi as soon as borders were re-drawn, same goes for Bhagat Singh also!
And for the living ones, when the nation was divided, those who wanted to be Bangladeshis/Pakistanis either moved to that part, or remained there if that part of the land went to Bangladesh. Similarly, those who wanted to be Indians either moved to that part, or remained there if that part of the land went to India, the personalities you are claiming to be Bangladeshis in fact have choosen India, so they are Indians, as simple as that.
And btw, those who moved from India to Bangladesh at the time of partition and took Bangladeshi citizenship are all Bangladeshis, calling them Indians would be a great injustice to them. Please don't do that!
The partition of India was all about personal political ambitions and communal politics.
Oh please! What you are saying is like Germans saying that Hitler was myth! There was a purge, a genocide and exodus of massive scale both in 1946-47 and 1971, and in between. In other times minorities left Bangladesh because of acute insecurity. My family members murdered in 40's didn't become myth Bilal9.
You didn't notice what I said, I said secular and liberal Bangladesh suits us more, but Jamatis are right when they say it is supposed to be a purely Muslim country, that was indeed the original idea behind the demand for creation of east & west Pakistan. Partition was not needed if east & west Pakistan (and later Bangladesh) was supposed to be secular and liberal countries. Seculars and liberals don't even need to partition a country on religious lines to create Muslim countries...this is totally in contradiction to the idea of 'secular' and 'liberal'.
Ki mushkil, cable operators can't air all the thousands of channels that exist around the world, they just show channels that are in demand, and local cable operators do show some Bangladeshi channels in spite of low viewership. Improve the quality and there will be demand, that's how it works. Why blame others for your failure?
I did say that I have seen Pran's ads, didn't I? If Bangladeshi products can compete here, they will come and compete and give as many ads they want, there is no restriction!
Most of the products that come from Bangladesh are either raw material or natural products like jute and fish that don't need ads, or non-branded garments, sarees, shoes etc. that again don't need ads. It's not our fault, we are open for Bangladeshi ads.
And what do you mean by Indian companies give ads free of cost in Bangladesh?
