Pretty weak response. It seems it was written more out of a feeling of obligation to provide an answer than for having any real arguments to add to the debate.
I showed u Arab demonstration with Palestinian flags in midst of Tel Aviv. No one touches them and no one gives a damn.
Oh boy, I referenced books, showed you articles written by Israeli sources, one of which about IDF soldiers admitting to infiltrating protests in order to give the IDF an excuse to arrest protesters, and you think you can refute all this with one of a thousand Youtube videos on Palestinian protesters. You know, many such videos of them have outcomes very different from that of the one you singled out. The one linked below, for example, shows many unarmed protesters being beaten by soldiers just for the sake of it.
My favourite is of an old woman getting it on the face just for addressing a soldier. You're a silly boy if you think you can refute recorded history with one Youtube video.
And even after they started throwing stones, molotov cocktails, stabbings, shootings, there were only 1000 killed in 6 years. Assad killed 2000 in first 5 months.
And Israel killed 1,000 in Gaza in four weeks.
139 villages and towns in that tiny area? Pfff u must be kidding. The only large settlement there was Quneitra. Righ on the border. And despite Israel handed it to Syria in 1974 it was not resettled.
I'm not kidding, and I showed you a reference: a peer reviewed book on Israeli history. I'm going to repeat what I told you before, as it seems you have to be taught on how to engage in a real debate: it isn't good enough for you to just blurt out you your opinions, or what you wished was the truth. You have to produce real arguments and evidence. I referenced articles on mainstream newspapers and book excerpts, and you're not going to refute me by simply saying "pffff" or writing in Caps Lock.
Plz show me pics of these 139 "towns"
The excerpt read, not "towns", but "villages". Learn to read, silly. And there are even more references on this number.
This one. And
this, and
this,
this,
this and
this. I could pass the whole day adducing more references supporting the number presented above. You also expelled from Palestine 700,000 of its native residents in 1948, and even till these days the hasbarists say Palestine was barely populated before the Zionists came in. Clearly there is a history of denialism on Israel's part regarding its record of ethnic cleansing. Whether you deny that to make yourselves feel better about your history, or to deceive the world at large about Israel's national character, I don't really know.
I already answered that joke. Israel planned complete withdrawal in 1983. We signed agreement with Lebanese government on than in May 1983. But it was Hezbollah and friends who foiled that deal.
The little agreement signed with Phalangist war criminal Amin Gemayel, under Reagan's blessing, was partial to Israel's occupation of Lebanon and did not establish a full and unconditional Israeli withdrawal from occupied Lebanon. It instead legitimized Israel's occupation of the south, and it was this that ignited the Shia ire against Israel and the uprising which culminated in Israeli defeat in 1985 and withdrawal to a narrow strip until 2000. Hezbollah didn't force you to a thing -- it was instead your pride, Israel's insistence on always finding something to save its face when cornered or defeated, that prompted your country to occupy parts of southern Lebanon until 2000. And this, Israeli leaders regreted very much. By so doing, you legitimized Hezbollah's growth and the continuation of "the resistence" even after the end of the civil war -- you "let the genie out of the bottle", as Ehud Barak regretfully said of Israel's continued presence in Lebanon.
I just say that Assad with all his 300,000 army, 5000 tanks planes artillery + Iranian Guards and Hezbollah is unable to defeat poorly armed rebels.
The rebels are suffering heavy casualties and they have already pulled out of Damascus's center and of the main neighbourhoods of Aleppo. I don't see them as very successful themselves. But since you like to compare them to Hezbollah, allow me to highlight, once again, that Hezbollah has been very successful at its struggle against you.
If rebels had 10% of Hezbollahs arms and equipment Assad would be dead by now.
Do you even know what weapons the rebels have been using? Probably only rebels themselves know their limits.
It is known that Saudi Arabia has been transferring heavy US-made stuff to them. What else have they been getting? Do you know?
The only achievement of Hezbollah is that it forced Israel to stay in Lebanon for 17 unnecessary years.
Is that why
Israeli generals have called Hezbollah's "by far the greatest guerrilla group in the world" ?
No, Israels purpose was to stop Hezbollah attacks. And it perfectly worked.
You sure it did? Anyway, many justifications were given by Israel and its supporters about its attack on Lebanon. The first one was that Israel needed to retrieve the captured soldiers. It failed at that, and now we know that that excuse was a fake one. Israeli officials themselves have debunked it by admitting this year that they knew they couldn't get the soldiers, or what was left of them, back. Later on, the war was justified on the grounds that Israel was opening a new front in the "war on terror". John Bolton, at the time the US envoy to the UN, determined that no ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel should be established before Israel succeeded in rooting out Hezbollah. (Later on, when it became clear that Israel was failing, he implored the Lebanese to get back to the negotiation table.) In fact, many western media outlets identified Israel's motivation as being the elimination of Hezbollah. The generally pro-Israel
Boston Globe published
this article that read that, "
Israel is attacking Lebanon again -- this time to root out Hezbollah". I can bring in more examples. In any case, has Israel succeeded? No. In fact, Hezbollah is more powerful now than six years ago. Israel thus lost.
Nasrallah is hiding in bunker and Hezbollah afraids to fire a bullet towards Israel.
So? He may fear a drone or some Mossad agent. Israel is known for its sneaky demeanor. And that says absolutely nothing about Israel's performance in the 2006 war.
They LOST POST WAR ELECTIONS (2009). And later they took power by coup and intimidation.
You forget that, prior to the 2006 war, there was a high degree of resentment among non-Shia Lebanese against Hezbollah, primarily because of the Hariri murder and of Hezbollah's connivence with the Syrian occupation of Lebanon. During the war and in the first few months following it, however, Hezbollah's popularity climbed all over Lebanon. This support, which could be expected only if Hezbollah was seen as victorious, was widely reported at the time. Support for Hezbollah's decision to capture the IDF soldiers, and its insistence on keeping its weapons,
skyrocketed, and not only among Shias, but also in all of Lebanon's other main communities (Sunnis, Christians and Druzes). The same is true about the broader Middle East. Even the Iraqi chapter of al-Qaeda, which has been merciless on Shias,
saw itself forced, in face of Hezbollah's victory, to call for pan-Islamic unity against Israel following the Lebanon war. If Hezbollah had been seen as the loser, no doubt its adversaries and rivals, instead of supporting it or calling for unity, would instead have used the occasion to pour scorn on the group (in fact, at the beginning of the war, many "moderate" MidEast countries, like Jordan and Saudi Arabia, quietly supported Israel and openly condemned Hezbollah; they didn't dare do so again at the end of the conflict). However, it's very natural that, by 2009, the effects of Hezbollah's victory would have worn off, and old resentments against the group would rise up again. Some such resentments are very understandable -- for instance, the fact that Hezbollah is the only non-state group in Lebanon allowed to store weapons. As I said before, resentment against Hezbollah is nothing new, and Israel's brief war couldn't by itself change it -- what it could do, was to temporarily unite Lebanon's community behind "the resistence" and signal a ceasefire between Hezbollah and its political rivals in Lebanon.