What's new

Have Israel's missile defense systems hit a snag?

DavidSling

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Oct 25, 2013
Messages
4,826
Reaction score
0
Country
Israel
Location
Israel
Has the fracture with the US about security funding and the departure of high ranking officials in the Defense Ministry led to a delay in the development of the Arrow, Iron Dome, & David's Sling?

ShowImage.ashx

Iron dome. (photo credit:MARC ISRAEL SELLEM/THE JERUSALEM POST)

Last year the Defense Ministry outlined a list of successful trials of air defense systems, a number of which were scheduled to enter into operational use later this year. Yet,there's a fly in the ointment: Following several crises, layoffs, and departures of people central to the projects, progress has slowed down. At this stage it is still unclear whether the lag in development will have ramifications on military activity and when it will pick up momentum again.

Everything seemed optimistic in November of last year after several meetings between Defense Minister Moshe Ya'alon and US Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter were held on the matter. At that point, the two officials had already agreed on the defense allowance Israel was to receive from the US to continue to develop defense systems.

Ya'alon went so far as to say: "The defense secretary and I are already discussing the next round of defense funding, because the current allocation, which we budgeted at $10 billion, is about to run out. One thing is clear," he added, "The financial assistance cannot stay at the same numbers, because clearly the need is greater today. The (Israeli) prime minister and the US president will discuss this need for additional support today."

Following the agreement negotiated between Ya'alon and Carter, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu held a meeting with US Secretary of State John Kerry to further discuss matters. The Jerusalem Post's sister publication, Maariv Hashavua, has learned that one of the conditions of the significant increase in defense support put in place by the government in Washington DC was a marked increase in efforts to compromise with the Palestinians, in an effort to renew political negotiations. However the prime minister back pedaled from his initial agreement due to the expected opposition to the conditions from the more hawkish elements of his narrow coalition.

The head of the Israel Missile Defense Organization (HOMA) in the Defense Ministry and the figure central to the development of air defense systems, Yair Ramati, was deposed from office after he violated information security regulations. His removal from his position as the head of the development of systems for the Arrow missile, Iron Dome, and David's Sling was a setback for the air defense institution.

Furthermore, his ouster has led to skepticism on the part of the Americans, who see no logical reason for his dismissal. Sources privy to the nature of his dismissal told Maariv Hashavua, that although a temporary replacement has filled Ramati's position, Colonel Aviram Hasson, the Americans "aren't buying" Israel's explanation regarding Ramati's removal.

As if that weren't enough, the head of the Administration for the Development of Weapons and Technological Infrastructure, Ofir Shoham, gave notice two weeks ago of his intentions to step down from his position in the current year.

The amalgamation of all of these factors caused air defense companies that have traditionally worked closely with the Defense Ministry to take a step back. One such company is Raytheon, a central partner that won a sizable portion of the American defense allocation after waiting a considerable amount of time for future contracting.

In a week in which the Secretary General of Hezbollah, Hassan Nasrallah, threatened to launch missiles at the ammonia plant in Haifa Bay, it appears that the air defense systems are ever more critical.

In spite of this, the Iron Dome, for example, that saw significant upgrades in the last year (particularly since Operation Protective Edge), has seen a downturn in development. David's Sling, a system that acts as additional defense against short to medium range missiles and rockets, has seen a similar lag in development.

The Defense Ministry stated that claims of a deceleration in the missile defense programs were baseless and "utter nonsense."

Israel multilayered missile defense systems
Iron Dome
David Sling
Patriot
Arrow 2
Arrow 3

Future systems
Iron Beam?

Another interceptors
Barak 1/8
Trophy
Iron Fist
Have Israel's missile defense systems hit a snag? - Israel News - Jerusalem Post

@500 @mike2000 is back @Blue Marlin @sarjenprabhu
 
Last edited:
As much as I know, we don't.
Patriot and David Sling should take care of the aerial threats but missiles like Drones, Aircrafts and so on.

Our side is surely looking for more cooperation with Israel. Particularly for Cruise Missile Defence system and they are impressed by David's Sling. Does it comes under MTCR or any big American influence ?

I wish the Arrow deal had materialised.
 
How much money do they need to keep all the projects on track?

Is there any solution that is more cost-efficient than these interceptor systems?
 
Our side is surely looking for more cooperation with Israel. Particularly for Cruise Missile Defence system and they are impressed by David's Sling. Does it comes under MTCR or any big American influence ?

I wish the Arrow deal had materialised.
David Sling and Arrow systems are partly developed and majority funded by the US.
Any purchase of those system will need american's approval
Israel Iron beam - very short range targets (like mortar fire which can't be intercepted by any other kind of system)
Israel Iron Dome - against short range targets ( Missiles and Drones mostly)
Israel and US David Sling - against medium range targets ( missiles, drones, aircrafts and more)
US Patriot - against medium range targets ( missiles, drones, aircrafts and more) next american version of patriot will use David Sling's missiles (the stunner).
Israel and US Arrow 2 - against longer range missiles (ballistic missiles)
Israel and US Arrow 3 - upper tier of Israel's missile defense, designed to take of the very long range ballistic missiles and can be used as anti satellite system.

Israel Trophy & Iron Fist (for armored vehicles and tanks) - designed to intercept incoming rockets and missiles
Israel Barak 1 & (Israel and India) 8 (for navy ships) - designed to intercept aerial threats like drones, aircrafts, missiles and so on.

How much money do they need to keep all the projects on track?

Is there any solution that is more cost-efficient than these interceptor systems?
Currently there's none.
There's not one system that can defend against so many threats.
In future laser defense system might replace some of the current systems.
Patriot will be replaced by David Sling in the near future.
 
Currently there's none.
There's not one system that can defend against so many threats.
In future laser defense system might replace some of the current systems.
Patriot will be replaced by David Sling in the near future.

I meant maybe removing the hostile launch platforms would be cheaper. But I guess that's probably close to impossible in the current situation.

Anyway these interceptor systems are good for other things too (e.g. defending against enemy nations), and Israel could probably sell on their platforms to the rest of the world for a very nice profit.
 
I meant maybe removing the hostile launch platforms would be cheaper. But I guess that's probably close to impossible in the current situation.

Anyway these interceptor systems are good for other things too (e.g. defending against enemy nations), and Israel could probably sell on their platforms to the rest of the world for a very nice profit.
Israel active protection is those missile defend systems combine with damaging the enemies launch platforms.
But it's important to achknowlege the fact that in today's war, terror groups use civilian population and infrastructure for their benefit, so hitting an home or an hospital where rockets are launched from is very problematic.
It's also important to mention that no system provides 100% defense, and that's why almost every Israeli citizen got a shelter in his home or nearby.
 
Back
Top Bottom